'Ground Zero mosque'
Professional spleen Charlie Brooker has a fun and seemingly factual take on the 'Ground Zero mosque'...
For one thing, it's not at Ground Zero. Also, it isn't a mosque.
Wait, it gets duller.... Cheeky hyperbole aside, the first points seem pretty fair, and pretty key. What do statesiders think? Is it all overblown nonsense? |
Re: 'Ground Zero mosque'
I think it's overblown if only because the news relies on the "fact" that it's a mosque to have a point at all. That survey that says 70% of americans are opposed doesn't really mean anything because 1/3 of americans don't know where Iraq is on a map. It's still a bad idea to build it because it is New York, and the locals will probably do something outlandish
|
Originally Posted by wintertriangles (Post 669525)
It's still a bad idea to build it because it is New York, and the locals will probably do something outlandish
|
Re: 'Ground Zero mosque'
I was thinking more throw molotov cocktails in the "mosque's" windows. New Yorkers are silly people like that
oh geez I'm bordering on propaganda I should be a reporter |
Re: 'Ground Zero mosque'
Yeah there's always that. Damn Commies.
;) Wouldn't it be giving in to 'extremists' to not build it on those grounds tho? |
Re: 'Ground Zero mosque'
Well yeah you could look at it that way in that we have a boo-boo and don't want any alcohol near it, but alcohol is useful in the long run for preventing future infection
|
Re: 'Ground Zero mosque'
They should absolutely be allowed to build it, and it is absolutely a bad idea. Assuming the panel that approves these things has acted responsibly (there's some question about them denying similar applications from other religious buildings, from what I've heard).
I have no idea what Brooker means when he says it "isn't a mosque." At no point in the article does he seem to explain this statement. If I had to guess, I think he might mean that it isn't only a mosque, which is a pretty ridiculous distinction in these circumstances. And, not to start some off-topic fight, but those polls about finding places on maps always end up being horrendously skewed. The only one I can recall, for example, had a higher number, but was limited to people 18-24. Do you have a cite? Either way, it seems they only ever conduct such polls on populations everyone already expects to fail. I think the numbers in most first-world countries, even Enlightened Europe, would surprise people, but I'm not sure making even-handed comparisons is usually the aim of the people conducting them. |
Re: 'Ground Zero mosque'
From everything I've read about it, it just seems like an Arabic YMCA with an area to pray, but yeah, it basically comes down to this:
They should absolutely be allowed to build it, and it is absolutely a bad idea.
|
Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 669531)
They should absolutely be allowed to build it, and it is absolutely a bad idea.
Originally Posted by Yods
I have no idea what Brooker means when he says it "isn't a mosque." At no point in the article does he seem to explain this statement. If I had to guess, I think he might mean that it isn't only a mosque, which is a pretty ridiculous distinction in these circumstances.
|
Re: 'Ground Zero mosque'
I don't know if this makes any difference, and not to get off into a bunch of discussions about 9/11, but the point that always brings 9/11 home for me is that these were just people going to work. They weren't soldiers, or on some foreign battlefield. They didn't live near an airfield, a nuclear reactor, or a missile silo. The target was not crucial or strategic; just symbolic. It was the very definition of terrorism: targeting civilians to inflict horror and despair, and it killed 3,000 people. That's almost as many Americans as have died in Iraq in 7 years, killed in one morning, and none of them signed up for any of it. For all the hyperbole in politics, this is one event that is difficult to exaggerate.
As for whether or not something will happen to it...it wouldn't surprise me, either. I hope it doesn't. |
Re: 'Ground Zero mosque'
A bad idea because of proximity to Ground Zero? But surely that's somewhat undermined by it being several streets away?
|
Originally Posted by Golgot (Post 669534)
A bad idea because of proximity to Ground Zero? But surely that's somewhat undermined by it being several streets away?
I've heard conflicting reports on whether or not the mosque will be visible from Ground Zero. That seems a rather important point, too. That said, it's still awfully close, and many of its supporters are citing the proximity as a reason to support it, so we're getting conflicting arguments (though not from you) as to why it's supposed to be acceptable.
Originally Posted by Golgot (Post 669534)
He paints it as being a 'centre' which includes a prayer room, yeah. Whether that's accurate, and if so whether a prayer room alone is considered a mosque, I don't know. I was kinda fishing for details from your side. My impression is that it won't have a minaret or calls to prayer ringing out or what have you.
Frankly, that article really gets under my skin. He just doesn't adequately support such a stark claim, and it seems he's more concerned with being pithy than being accurate. And since the entire column's premise seems to be to cut somewhat dispassionately through the rhetoric, that's pretty galling. |
Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 669537)
Frankly, that article really gets under my skin. He just doesn't adequately support such a stark claim, and it seems he's more concerned with being pithy than being accurate. And since the entire column's premise seems to be to cut somewhat dispassionately through the rhetoric, that's pretty galling.
There's a number of interesting points emerging for me as an outsider tho:
This Q&A with the Imam proposing the centre makes for interesting reading. It doesn't answer the above per se, but one thing they seem to stress is this idea that the placement is about staying within a particular community, not about proximity to GZ per se. (Altho it includes a 9/11 memorial apparently). After this surface skim I'd say it still seems a reasonable proposal. But obviously you guys are gonna have more dirt and detail available to you. |
Re: 'Ground Zero mosque'
All mosques are the same in a simple way. They all celebrate Islam. It would be ridiculously inappropriate to build a mosque where the very religion being exhalted was most disgraced.
Sure, they should be able to build a mosque. Just move it. I have no problem with American Muslim's, or even visiting Muslim's practicing their faith in our country - but really? By the location that your religion was completely humiliated and commited one of the worst crimes in the history of existence? I wouldn't be any more tolerant of any other faith building a place of worship where it was at its lowest. |
Originally Posted by Fiscal (Post 669580)
It would be ridiculously inappropriate to build a mosque where the very religion being exhalted was most disgraced.
|
It is my understanding that the proposed site for the Mosque is the old Burlington factory building which is approximately 600 feet from where the World Trade Center buildings stood... and that the building sustained damage during the 9/11 attack... it's been a while now, so my memory is faulty, but I believe they recovered parts of one of the planes out of that building... and also body parts. If that is the case, then that building is part of ground zero....
Should they be allowed to build a Mosque? Yes... but not there. The wounds from 9/11 are still much too raw.... |
I read an article that said the landlord of this proposed mosque is not a very good landlord. This is it:
http://www.allgov.com/Top_Stories/Vi...andlord_100902 It's in TERRIBLE taste and I hate the thought of it. My feeling is that this landlord is probably just seeking attention. Hopefully the mosque doesn't happen. I certainly wouldn't go to that mosque. I say the landlord just wants attention. It probably won't happen -- but if it does, someone will burn that mosque down. |
Re: 'Ground Zero mosque'
but if it does, someone will burn that mosque down.
|
Re: 'Ground Zero mosque'
I think freedom of religion is a wonderful thing but I believe you do have to weigh the sensitivities of other religions when making your decisions. While it's true that far more "Christians", Jews and non-religious people died at Ground Zero, there were several Muslims (I don't mean the hijackers) who died there too. Having a place for anti-terrorist Muslims to meet and worship is not really a slap in the face of all Americans, but I don't actually recall anybody stating that as a point of putting the building in its present location.
I'm pretty sure that it will be erected and opened ASAP and that there will be protests and demonstrations on a daily basis. We do tend to get violent when emotions run high so that it was I'm most fearful of. It seems like it may be against the foundations laid in the creation of the U.S., but it would also seem the wise and safe thing would be to build it a bit further away from its current site. However, since that's the case, it probably won't happen. From what I understand, the owner/developer needs money and wants it now, so it's probably a done deal. I hope this doesn't turn into another thread where people claim that religion is responsible for everything evil and backwards in the world... |
Originally Posted by Caitlyn (Post 669588)
It is my understanding that the proposed site for the Mosque is the old Burlington factory building... and that the building sustained damage during the 9/11 attack... I believe they recovered parts of one of the planes out of that building... and also body parts.
I still feel the second point remains however. Should average Islamic believers be treated as terrorists-by-association? So long as the centre is run respectfully (and there are signs that it will be, in terms of the memorial etc), I'd say that association is a step too far, and unhelpful in terms of moving on from 9/11. |
All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:03 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright, ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Movie Forums