Why is Mulholland dr considered a masterpiece?
Sorry if this is a dumb thread or in the wrong place but I found this film really disapointing. It started off mezmerizing but quickly started to feel like a tv movie on life time. Maybe it was on purpose but Naomi's character felt really campy as well as certain others but I felt almost no interest in the sections based around the two female leads (alsothe lesbian scene felt forced and like something from a softcore porn flick). Actually I was much more engaged in the parts surrounding the director. The scenes with with bim like where he caught his wife cheating or when he meets the Cowboy were pure gold ^^ That said the movie played out like a thriller with psychological elements and the main thing that kept me watching was curiosity to see how things would connect (plus i wanted to see why it was called Lynch's masterpiece). In the end though it went from being somewhat grounded in reality to an abstract mess leaving me confused and utterly unsatisfied.
Now understand I like surrealism and i dont always mind being confused but the biggest issue is I mostly felt bored and feel no motivation to rewatch this film and get a better idea on what happened and what everything meant. I much prefered Lynch's more normal film The elephant man as well as his earlier piece of nightmare fuel Eraserhead. For surrealsim I think The Holy mountain, Fear and loathing in las vegas, Possession, and The hourglass Sanitarium are better films than Mullholand dr. |
Re: Why is Mulholland dr considered a masterpiece?
Thanks for the Lynch Club Thread :)
|
Re: Why is Mulholland dr considered a masterpiece?
Originally Posted by Camo (Post 1748185)
If you isolate the lesbian love story it's the most distressing thing ever. Reminds me of thinking of the small things in Perfect Blue.
I don't think much gets under my skin as much as this cryptically told (as if it may not even be real and if it is it's barely a memory despite how intense it is) broken relationship, it's like Eternal Sunshine except instead of forgetting a person with miniscule memories you have intense stabbing memories that hurt to watch. Well i'm rabbling, i dunno this film does alot for me. |
Re: Why is Mulholland dr considered a masterpiece?
|
Re: Why is Mulholland dr considered a masterpiece?
What about Mr Ebert?
|
"In the end though it went from being somewhat grounded in reality to an abstract mess leaving me confused and utterly unsatisfied."
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/aEtm69mLK6w/hqdefault.jpg |
Re: Why is Mulholland dr considered a masterpiece?
Dude, check out 'Inland Empire.' You'll love it!
|
Re: Why is Mulholland dr considered a masterpiece?
Are you saying it didnt become more abstract towards the end? Maybe i worded what i wanted to say poorly but id apreciate words over images.
|
Re: Why is Mulholland dr considered a masterpiece?
Originally Posted by Cynema De Bergerac (Post 1748202)
Dude, check out 'Inland Empire.' You'll love it!
|
Originally Posted by Mr_TagoMago (Post 1748206)
Ive heard its Lynchs most experimental and seems to be his most divisive. That interests me but its 3 hours long and after being disapointed here it might be a while before i make the effort.
|
Re: Why is Mulholland dr considered a masterpiece?
Originally Posted by Joel (Post 1748211)
Originally Posted by Mr_TagoMago (Post 1748206)
Ive heard its Lynchs most experimental and seems to be his most divisive. That interests me but its 3 hours long and after being disapointed here it might be a while before i make the effort.
|
Originally Posted by Mr_TagoMago (Post 1748213)
Lol! I thought maybe i just worded my post poorly. Im often poor at articulating what I want to say (probably due to being autistic). I havent seen enough Lynch to judge him but The Elephant man is my favorite that ive seen though probably more because of Hurt than anything else ^^
|
Re: Why is Mulholland dr considered a masterpiece?
Originally Posted by Joel (Post 1748233)
Originally Posted by Mr_TagoMago (Post 1748213)
Lol! I thought maybe i just worded my post poorly. Im often poor at articulating what I want to say (probably due to being autistic). I havent seen enough Lynch to judge him but The Elephant man is my favorite that ive seen though probably more because of Hurt than anything else ^^
|
Re: Why is Mulholland dr considered a masterpiece?
Lynch is a cult director who makes film with his unique brand of surrealism. He is never going to be mainstream with a wide audience, but his fans love him. And I am a die hard Lynch fan. I find that Mulholland Drive is his masterpiece since it is the perfect blend of his unique surrealism with a more traditional narrative.
Also one does not watch a Lynch movie and understand it right out 100% (save the Elephant Man and The Straight Story). Everything else will require more then one viewing to truly appreciate the film. It did for me for both Mulholland Drive and Eraserhead in particular. |
Re: Why is Mulholland dr considered a masterpiece?
Originally Posted by The Gunslinger45 (Post 1748250)
Lynch is a cult director who makes film with his unique brand of surrealism. He is never going to be mainstream with a wide audience, but his fans love him. And I am a die hard Lynch fan. I find that Mulholland Drive is his masterpiece since it is the perfect blend of his unique surrealism with a more traditional narrative.
Also one does not watch a Lynch movie and understand it right out 100% (save the Elephant Man and The Straight Story). Everything else will require more then one viewing to truly appreciate the film. It did for me for both Mulholland Drive and Eraserhead in particular. What do you think of Blue Velvet, and Inland Empire? |
Originally Posted by Mr_TagoMago (Post 1748269)
I'd actually say as far as surrealist directors go hes pretty mainstream compared to say Alejandro Jodorowsky, Andrzej Żuławski, or even Luis Buñuel. Eraserhead was easy to apreciate on first viewing imo.
What do you think of Blue Velvet, and Inland Empire? Inland Empire was by far his most out there and surreal work. Blue Velvet is just pure ****ing brilliance. Used to be my favorite Lynch before Mulholland Drive too that title. |
Re: Why is Mulholland dr considered a masterpiece?
well sorry it is a dumb thread lol because its a classic film , probably will go down as the best hollywood satire in cinema history, the dreaded intriguing feeling lets u feel the misery that the characters are in, its the ultimate depiction of LA movie stars when they go away from the spotlight and the david lynch depicts the story is second to none? an absolute joy ride of a film.
|
Re: Why is Mulholland dr considered a masterpiece?
Originally Posted by The Gunslinger45 (Post 1748271)
Originally Posted by Mr_TagoMago (Post 1748269)
I'd actually say as far as surrealist directors go hes pretty mainstream compared to say Alejandro Jodorowsky, Andrzej Żuławski, or even Luis Buñuel. Eraserhead was easy to apreciate on first viewing imo.
What do you think of Blue Velvet, and Inland Empire? Inland Empire was by far his most out there and surreal work. Blue Velvet is just pure ****ing brilliance. Used to be my favorite Lynch before Mulholland Drive too that title. |
Re: Why is Mulholland dr considered a masterpiece?
Originally Posted by rambond (Post 1748273)
well sorry it is a dumb thread lol because its a classic film , probably will go down as the best hollywood satire in cinema history, the dreaded intriguing feeling lets u feel the misery that the characters are in, its the ultimate depiction of LA movie stars when they go away from the spotlight and the david lynch depicts the story is second to none? an absolute joy ride of a film.
|
Originally Posted by Mr_TagoMago (Post 1748276)
I feel urged to watch Inland Empire but im intimidated. Id hate to waste 3 hours but i could very well love it.
|
All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:52 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright, ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Movie Forums