Nolan Copycats
Denis Villeneuve
Sam Mendes These 2 directors are successful and talented. But there is no denying that they lack a distinct voice or a thruline among all their movies and they seem to be influenced by christopher nolan in an unethical way. When directors like jon Favreau(Iron Man) or Martin Campbell(Casino Royale) say they are inspired by batman begins it doesn't feel like they are copying the movie or style because once you look at their movies you notice that they are nothing like batman begins and their inspiration is only thematic and not filmmaking wise. But if you take Denis, he is trying to build his whole career like Nolan. After making decent thriller like sicario and prisoners he made arrival which feels like a sci-fi movie nolan would do with maybe more action. Then he wanted to do blade runner , an existing IP like batman hoping that he would get fans of blade runner 2049 to support him in his other movies by buying tickets like Nolan fanbase do. But it backfired and the movie bombed. But still the intentions are there. Sam Mendes is a different case. He had a distinct style until revolutionary road/away we go. But once his career was down, his films started becoming franchise but more importantly like nolan he tried copying his storytelling style by making 2 or 3 tense scenes taking place at the same time that are all ramping up and intercutting between them. Even 1917 looks like Dunkirk from the trailers. I am pretty sure they greenlit this movie after Dunkirk's success. So what do you guys think of this Copycats. They are talented of course but they seem to be confusing copying for success formula or its just on purpose just so they can be successful. |
Re: Nolan Copycats
When all you have is a hammer, everything starts to look like a nail.
|
I think anyone who would copy Nolan isn't even worth a discussion. With that said, BR2049 was a solid effort and reminded me nothing of Nolan.
But yawn.. |
Originally Posted by Iroquois (Post 2029067)
When all you have is a hammer, everything starts to look like a nail.
|
Re: Nolan Copycats
Both Nolan and Villeneuve are excellent, and I find very little, if anything, in common between their styles...
|
Re: Nolan Copycats
I mean there are some similarities but I suspect that's mostly the product of the way of film industry functions at the moment with Nolan being thje archetypical smaller scale artier director who moved into mainstream cinema successfully.
Ironically execs would probably point to Blade Runner 2049 and say "see THATS why we dumb down big sci fi blockbusters and make them non R". |
Originally Posted by aronisred (Post 2029070)
not a valid counterpoint to be honest
Originally Posted by aronisred (Post 2029046)
These 2 directors are successful and talented. But there is no denying that they lack a distinct voice or a thruline among all their movies and they seem to be influenced by christopher nolan in an unethical way.
When directors like jon Favreau(Iron Man) or Martin Campbell(Casino Royale) say they are inspired by batman begins it doesn't feel like they are copying the movie or style because once you look at their movies you notice that they are nothing like batman begins and their inspiration is only thematic and not filmmaking wise.
But if you take Denis, he is trying to build his whole career like Nolan. After making decent thriller like sicario and prisoners he made arrival which feels like a sci-fi movie nolan would do with maybe more action. Then he wanted to do blade runner , an existing IP like batman hoping that he would get fans of blade runner 2049 to support him in his other movies by buying tickets like Nolan fanbase do. But it backfired and the movie bombed. But still the intentions are there.
Sam Mendes is a different case. He had a distinct style until revolutionary road/away we go. But once his career was down, his films started becoming franchise but more importantly like nolan he tried copying his storytelling style by making 2 or 3 tense scenes taking place at the same time that are all ramping up and intercutting between them. Even 1917 looks like Dunkirk from the trailers. I am pretty sure they greenlit this movie after Dunkirk's success.
So what do you guys think of this Copycats. They are talented of course but they seem to be confusing copying for success formula or its just on purpose just so they can be successful.
|
Originally Posted by Iroquois (Post 2029092)
I think that Nolan, for all his strengths as a filmmaker, should not be seen as such a be-all and end-all of contemporary filmmaking success that other filmmakers should be judged based on whether or not their choices happen to correlate even slightly with his. Even Nolan himself can be viewed as delivering lesser variations on other works (don't get me started on how many movies Interstellar made me wish I was watching instead).
Blade Runner 2049 wasn't entirely free from that either I spose but it did also have a rather more subtle hand with the drama around K and Joi and more focus on building atmosphere. That film flopping has I'd guess set a very bad precedent in Hollywood although to be fair I think part of that was down to allowing the budget to become bloated. |
Originally Posted by MoreOrLess (Post 2029087)
I mean there are some similarities but I suspect that's mostly the product of the way of film industry functions at the moment with Nolan being thje archetypical smaller scale artier director who moved into mainstream cinema successfully.
Ironically execs would probably point to Blade Runner 2049 and say "see THATS why we dumb down big sci fi blockbusters and make them non R". |
Originally Posted by aronisred (Post 2029166)
I think there is a valid reason why 2049 bombed. It's not entirely audience fault or its entirely the brand blade runner's fault. The movie bears significant blame on why it bombed.
To be fair when you take home viewing into account it probably didn't "bomb" but it is likely still some way off of turning a profit. The problem really IMHO is that studios have pretty much abandoned mid budget films(outside of a few well known names), everything has to be either a mega budget blockbuster or a small production. An r-rated somewhat arty drama based on a cult film should probably have been looking at around half the budget it had. For what it was the film was very well received but these days it was never going to be a success on the level of say 2OO1. |
Re: Nolan Copycats
This is a bizarre topic. Denis's movies remind me nothing of Nolan and Mendes got his start before Nolan did. Maybe his Bond movies have a hint of Nolan but that's pushing it. Nolan has a pretty distinct voice. I assume guys coming up may be inspired by him.
As far of Blade Runner 2049. I am still in amazement that movie got made at all. 1.) Nobody was clamoring for it. 2.) It is the antithesis of what Hollywood is pushing for now socially. 3.) I don't think it was ever really going make money. But God dammit am I grateful it got made because it's amazing. Whatever you want to say about it, it's probably the most gorgeous movie I've ever seen. |
Originally Posted by MovieBuffering (Post 2029233)
This is a bizarre topic. Denis's movies remind me nothing of Nolan and Mendes got his start before Nolan did. Maybe his Bond movies have a hint of Nolan but that's pushing it. Nolan has a pretty distinct voice. I assume guys coming up may be inspired by him.
As far of Blade Runner 2049. I am still in amazement that movie got made at all. 1.) Nobody was clamoring for it. 2.) It is the antithesis of what Hollywood is pushing for now socially. 3.) I don't think it was ever really going make money. But God dammit am I grateful it got made because it's amazing. Whatever you want to say about it, it's probably the most gorgeous movie I've ever seen. |
Re: Nolan Copycats
:D:D:D:D:D Villeneuve's movies are nothing like Nolan's. Villeneuve released his first feature before Nolan released his too.
Please tell me which parts of 'Maelstrom', 'Incendies', 'August 32nd on Earth' and 'Polytechnique' are "copying" Nolan. |
Re: Nolan Copycats
Nolan's movies are much more fast paced and dialogue driven, where as Villeneuve's are slower paced, that rely on more visual storytelling compared to dialogue. Comparing the two is like comparing Martin Scorsese to Sergio Leone.
|
Originally Posted by aronisred (Post 2029306)
don't you think the movie itself was to be partially blamed for its box office performance ? director denis doesn't yet have an eye for commericality and including crowd pleasing elements in his movies
|
Re: Nolan Copycats
Why did Blade Runner 2049 flop when the first one is so well liked and regarded as a classic?
|
Originally Posted by ironpony (Post 2029366)
Why did Blade Runner 2049 flop when the first one is so well liked and regarded as a classic?
I'd say that extends into the marketing as well, films like Blade Runner 2049, Tron Legacy or Ghost in the Shell all I'd say had a similar problem in that they assumed too much audience knowledge in trailers that did a very poor job of telling you what the films were actually about. |
Originally Posted by aronisred (Post 2029306)
don't you think the movie itself was to be partially blamed for its box office performance ? director denis doesn't yet have an eye for commericality and including crowd pleasing elements in his movies If we are measuring a director's quality on his/her ability to draw in big audiences, then the Russo Brothers and Cameron are the greatest directors of all times. Or worse even Michael Bay. In fact, Bay knows exactly how to play to the gallery. However, in reality the commercial success of a movie depends on several other things :actors, subject, marketing, etc. On a side note, this thread is an example of what I was saying in the 'Originality" thread. |
Originally Posted by ironpony (Post 2029366)
Why did Blade Runner 2049 flop when the first one is so well liked and regarded as a classic?
Additionally the movie was, and to a large extent still is, considered a niche subject. It urges you to think about humanity and ideas around it, without rewarding you with smash-bang visuals. It was presented in a non-commercial manner. Combine that with huge production costs, and it is deemed as a commercial flop. But for its fanbase, it remained true to its subject. And therefore it continues to be loved amongst its fanbase. |
Originally Posted by WrinkledMind (Post 2029551)
And some of us are hugely glad of that.
If we are measuring a director's quality on his/her ability to draw in big audiences, then the Russo Brothers and Cameron are the greatest directors of all times. Or worse even Michael Bay. In fact, Bay knows exactly how to play to the gallery. However, in reality the commercial success of a movie depends on several other things :actors, subject, marketing, etc. On a side note, this thread is an example of what I was saying in the 'Originality" thread. |
All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:06 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright, ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Movie Forums