Difference between a 2GB 1080p and a 15GB 1080p file?
Will there be a noticeable difference between a 1080p 2gb movie (roughly 2000 kbps) and a 1080p 15gb movie (roughly 16 mbps)?
|
Re: Will there be a noticeable difference between a 2GB 1080p and a 13
Obviously that's going to depend on what you're watching it on. Also, kbps and mbps are units of transfer speed, not quality.
|
Re: Will there be a noticeable difference between a 2GB 1080p and a 13
Thanks for the quick reply! I'll be watching it on a 40" 1080p TV. Also, I know that kb/mbps are units of transfer speed, but they usually affect how good the movie looks, right?
|
Re: Will there be a noticeable difference between a 2GB 1080p and a 13
By itself, no, it shouldn't. The only reason it's sometimes mentioned in relation to quality is because places that stream movies will adjust the quality based on your connection speed, under the assumption that you'd rather lose quality than have the stream stop altogether. But if you're talking about playing a file, rather than streaming it, I can't imagine where transfer speed would come into it.
I suppose I could be wrong; any home theater experts can correct me if I am. |
Re: Will there be a noticeable difference between a 2GB 1080p and a 13
Sounds like something that would need to be set up and tested empirically - just see what looks best using the two formats in question.
Might try a home theater forum, as well. |
Originally Posted by eivom (Post 1031390)
Will there be a noticeable difference between a 1080p 2gb movie (roughly 2000 kbps) and a 1080p 15gb movie (roughly 16 mbps)?
|
Re: Will there be a noticeable difference between a 2GB 1080p and a 13
Yoda, since the 2gb version is much more compressed than the 15gb one, would I not encounter the same situation as with streaming (lower size at the expense of quality)?
Sedai, I was kind of hoping to not have to do that since others might have already done it... Mesmerized: lol, you don't say? :P |
Originally Posted by eivom (Post 1031390)
Will there be a noticeable difference between a 1080p 2gb movie (roughly 2000 kbps) and a 1080p 15gb movie (roughly 16 mbps)?
|
Originally Posted by eivom (Post 1031587)
since the 2gb version is much more compressed than the 15gb one, would I not encounter the same situation as with streaming (lower size at the expense of quality)?
|
If you're talking about blu-ray rips, then the bigger the file the better. x264 codec maintains a good bit rate under compression, thats why scene rippers use it. I generally download 10-12gb rips: perfect 1080p quality on a big TV.
|
Originally Posted by The Sci-Fi Slob (Post 1031731)
x264 codec maintains a good bit rate under compression, thats why scene rippers use it.
|
Re: Will there be a noticeable difference between a 2GB 1080p and a 13
I HATE compressed video.
|
Re: Will there be a noticeable difference between a 2GB 1080p and a 13
Sources are too big. I can't hoard as much with sources.
|
Originally Posted by Harry Lime (Post 1031899)
The scene? Really?
|
Originally Posted by The Sci-Fi Slob (Post 1032955)
You do know that the "The Scene" is colloquial term for the community of TV/blu-ray rippers, right?
It's not the term for the community. It's a term for a specific community. My question was more in regards to you using the scene as an example in a discussion about quality. I am a big fan of the scene and what they do, but that's when I want something fast out of the gate and am not concerned too much about quality. |
Re: Difference between a 2GB 1080p and a 15GB 1080p file?
Sorry for late response! Harry Lime: Thanks for your input. YIFY Torrents' 1080p's are ~2GB. The Sci-Fi Slob: Yeah, I'm trying to compare Blu-Ray rips. Do you have any suggestions for sites to get 10-12gb rips?
|
Re: Difference between a 2GB 1080p and a 15GB 1080p file?
Yify is garbage. Really, it's banned on a lot of the sites I'm on because of reasons I listed above.
No suggestions are allowed on these forums, eivom. We can discuss file sharing but we can't provide a means or information on how or where to get shared files. |
Originally Posted by Harry Lime (Post 1033057)
The scene that was stuck using xvid for SD for years because of their stupid, archaic rules despite x264 being far superior? The same ones that compresses to fixed sizes like 4.37GB so that they fit on DVD5s even though nobody uses DVD as storage anymore?
|
Originally Posted by The Sci-Fi Slob (Post 1033802)
The same scene that risks prison time to bring rips to people who winge about minor quality problems and video codecs.
|
Re: Difference between a 2GB 1080p and a 15GB 1080p file?
But I digress, like I said before the main reason for my incredulity above was due to the fact that quality and scene used in the same sentence is quite funny. And like I said I'm a fan of the scene and what they do, it's good for that quick fix but not archival.
|
All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:21 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright, ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Movie Forums