Best Cinematography Oscar 2014
2 Attachment(s)
The five nominees are...
http://www.movieforums.com/community...1&d=1389209602 The Grandmaster, Philippe Le Sourd http://www.movieforums.com/community...1&d=1389887862 Gravity, Emmanuel Lubezki http://www.movieforums.com/community...1&d=1389213259 Inside Llewyn Davis, Bruno Delbonnel http://www.movieforums.com/community...1&d=1389887892 Nebraska, Phedon Papamichael http://www.movieforums.com/community...1&d=1389209602 Prisoners, Roger Deakins . . . |
Re: Best Cinematography Oscar 2014
Gravity obviously. Really glad to see Prisoners nominated, though. Roger Deakins did a wonderful job in that film.
|
Re: Best Cinematography Oscar 2014
Will be Gravity, should be Inside Llewyn Davis.
|
Originally Posted by Daniel M (Post 1018475)
Will be Gravity, should be Inside Llewyn Davis.
|
Knowing the academy, this category is obviously going to Gravity.
|
Re: Best Cinematography Oscar 2014
Gravity looks amazing, hard to say whether a CGI heavy film should win cinematography though. Prisoners looks amazing and would probably be my pick. Can't wait to see Llewyn Davis.
|
Re: Best Cinematography Oscar 2014
Prisoners blew me away on Blu-ray. One of the best movies I've seen in high definition. I'm voting for that because, well, I loved the way it looked and I haven't seen the others and it has Jake Gyllenhaal in it.
|
Re: Best Cinematography Oscar 2014
Can somebody explain to me how best cinematography is chosen? What distinguishes these films from any other film? What is it that makes them better than others? I really don't understand :/
|
Originally Posted by Sexy Celebrity (Post 1018677)
Prisoners blew me away on Blu-ray. One of the best movies I've seen in high definition. I'm voting for that because, well, I loved the way it looked and I haven't seen the others and it has Jake Gyllenhaal in it.
Then I realized why it looked so great as soon as the credits rolled. |
Re: Best Cinematography Oscar 2014
Originally Posted by Sexy Celebrity (Post 1018677)
Prisoners blew me away on Blu-ray. One of the best movies I've seen in high definition. I'm voting for that because, well, I loved the way it looked and I haven't seen the others and it has Jake Gyllenhaal in it.
|
Re: Best Cinematography Oscar 2014
I loved the look of Inside Llewyn Davis, I thought the film looks stunning as did Prisoners. But I picked Gravity. The film looked absolutely mesmerizing when I was in the movie theater.Visuals were(pardon the pun) literally out of this world.
|
Re: Best Cinematography Oscar 2014
Gravity will win this category easily.
|
Re: Best Cinematography Oscar 2014
Rush really should have gotten a nomination for cinematography
|
Re: Best Cinematography Oscar 2014
Gravity will take it.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by filmlover11 (Post 1019350)
Can somebody explain to me how best cinematography is chosen? What distinguishes these films from any other film? What is it that makes them better than others? I really don't understand :/
However, once the nominees have been announced, every Academy member with a ballot gets to decide from among those five which is the "best". Whether they have an intimate, intricate understanding of what goes into the craft or not. http://www.movieforums.com/community...1&d=1390181529 . . |
1 Attachment(s)
http://www.movieforums.com/community...1&d=1391486061
This past weekend, the American Society of Cinematographers bestowed their annual award for the best work in a feature film. Emmanuel Lubezki won for Gravity. As for how accurate a predictor for Oscar: well, not very. The ASC has been giving this award since 1986. In the twenty-seven years since, their award has only paired with Oscar ten times. That is a measly 37%. Even with that negative history, Gravity should still be considered the favorite. . . |
1 Attachment(s)
Ten days until the Academy Awards and we find out if Gravity's visual brilliance lands it this trophy.
How about snubs here? Anybody think there was a wonderfully shot movie from last year that didn't make the Oscar's list of five but should have? Not surprisingly, Terrence Malick's To the Wonder is magnificently shot, by Emmanuel Lubezki, who is the favorite for Gravity, anyway. It didn't generate the kinds of awards attention that The Tree of Life did, nor is it as intricately designed as far as motion the way that Cuarón's film is, but it's beautiful to look at, for sure. I also liked Adam Stone's work in Jeff Nichols' Mud and I hope they continue to collaborate, Sean Bobbitt captured some terrific stuff in Derek Cianfrance's The Place Beyond the Pines, and I thought Hoyte Van Hoytema and Spike Jonze very deftly combined L.A. and Shanghai for a subtle but extremely effective and evocative near-future Los Angeles in Her. I kind of can't believe that, even with a fairly limited filmography, that Van Hoytema hasn't been Oscar nominated yet. Let the Right One In, The Fighter, Her and Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy are all top-notch. He's the D.P. for Christopher Nolan's Interstellar, releasing late in 2014, so he may very well be on the Oscar rolls next time. http://www.movieforums.com/community...1&d=1392909173 |
Originally Posted by Holden Pike (Post 1040057)
How about snubs here? Anybody think there was a wonderfully shot movie from last year that didn't make the Oscar's list of five but should have?
|
1 Attachment(s)
http://www.movieforums.com/community...1&d=1393971424
Again, completely unsurprising, but well deserved, and a bit of a belated Oscar for Emmanuel Lubezki, who definitely should have won before this (in his five previous nominations), certainly for The Tree of Life. Anyway, he's got one, now. Maybe next year will finally be Roger Deakins' turn with Unbroken? Tune in next March. . |
All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:50 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright, ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Movie Forums