Best Orson Welles
1 Attachment(s)
Orson Welles is one of the most famous and lastingly influential filmmakers ever. His legend has outsized his body of work. In an era where his contemporaries made dozens of films Welles left behind only a handful. Always the maverick searching for financing beyond the Hollywood Studios resulted in a small if mighty filmography of finished projects. Citizen Kane is reflexively named one of the greatest films of all time...but do you MoFos agree? In the poll above choose what you believe to be his best or your favorite or both. Citizen Kane The Magnificent Ambersons The Stranger The Lady from Shanghai Macbeth Othello Mr. Arkadin/Confidential Report Touch of Evil The Trial Chimes at Midnight F for Fake The Other Side of the Wind |
I'd be interested to see The Third Man on the list.
|
Re: Best Orson Welles
Orson Welles did not direct The Third Man. Carol Reed did.
Make your own poll. :) |
Re: Best Orson Welles
I think Holden's intent was to measure the popularity of Welles' directorial efforts exclusively. A similar poll for his acting efforts might be interesting, but I insist those wine commercials be on it.
EDIT: sniped! |
I'm feeling The Trial today. Watched it a few months back and it's still floating around in my head. I'm sure there are better choices but I'll pick that one.
|
Re: Best Orson Welles
Since I haven't seen all of his films, I don't think if it would fair for me to vote on this poll, but for what it's worth, Touch of Evil is my favorite of what I've seen so far.
|
Originally Posted by SpelingError (Post 2169152)
Since I haven't seen all of his films, I don't think if it would fair for me to vote on this poll, but for what it's worth, Touch of Evil is my favorite of what I've seen so far.
|
Originally Posted by Holden Pike (Post 2169149)
Orson Welles did not direct The Third Man. Carol Reed did.
Make your own poll. :) |
Originally Posted by Holden Pike (Post 2169157)
Vote however you want, but I don't think it has to be definitive. If you have seen some Orson Welles movies and have a favorite I say vote for it. We will not tattoo it to you. You reserve the right to change your mind at any time. It's only an informal poll.
|
Re: Best Orson Welles
"Citizen Kane" - I don't think any of his other movies even come close.
|
Re: Best Orson Welles
All I know is The Stranger is the worst
As for what his best it, Citizen Kane has to be the easy answer, but it's still a struggle to rank them. Maybe something like this? Citizen Kane (mega love) Touch of Evil (mega love) Magnificent Ambersons (love) F is For Fake (love) Lady From Shanghai (love) Mr Arkadin (mostly love) The Trial (mostly love) The Other Side of the Wind (kinda love) MacBeth (good) The Stranger (meh) Haven't seen Chimes of Midnight or his Othello, but I'm generally not the biggest fan of Shakespeare adaptations, so these probably wouldn't threaten the ones at the top |
I liked The Stranger. Better then The Lady from Shanghai in my opinion. Except Shanghai had a better ending, not that it detracts from Strangers ending, but you can’t beat that shoot out scene in the hall of mirrors and that final line.
Of his films I have seen that he has directed, which it occurs to me is not enough, it’s a dead heat between Kane and Ambersons. Hmmm. I’ve seen more of his performances then I have of his directorial efforts. |
Originally Posted by crumbsroom (Post 2169168)
Haven't seen Chimes of Midnight or his Othello, but I'm generally not the biggest fan of Shakespeare adaptations, so these probably wouldn't threaten the ones at the top
I'm generally fine with Shakespeare adaptations, but ones which modernize the settings of his plays often leave me cold. I feel this can lead to many awkward moments in those films which would've worked fine had the setting/time period not been changed. I'm still not sure what to make of Luhrmann's Romeo + Juliet, but his style tends to bug me in general. |
Originally Posted by SpelingError (Post 2169178)
I misread that as "I'm generally not the biggest fan of Shakespeare" at first and was shocked as all hell.
I'm generally fine with Shakespeare adaptations, but ones which modernize the settings of his plays often leave me cold. I feel this can lead to many awkward moments in those films which would've worked fine had the setting/time period not been changed. I'm still not sure what to make of Luhrmann's Romeo + Juliet, but his style tends to bug me in general. Prepare to still be shocked then. I don't know if it was school that rubbed me the wrong way (FTR it definitely did), but I'm not really a fan of Shakespeare. Not that I don't have an appreciation for how he structures his stories, or (in particular) the complicated characters he populated them with. But I find a lot of the dialogue, outside of the occasional monologue, fairly ponderous to read. I also don't have any particular love for theater, so wading through stage directions and such is not my idea of a good time. I have liked some adaptations though. Olivier's Hamlet is really good. And so is Kenneth Branagh's. And Polanski's MacBeth is a vicious hoot. So I actually don't mind adaptations at times if an actor really brings his words to life (which I find just sit on the page, when I read them by myself). But the reality is I just rarely seek out Shakespearean adaptations to watch, since I'm always suspicious of how much I'll be in the mood for actors wandering around and moaning their hearts out. Sometimes it turns out great, othertimes I feel like I'm back in school hell being assigned some asinine project to memorize one of his soliloquy's. I do really want to see Chimes of Midnight, regardless though. If it wasn't for the pandemic I would have definitely got my hands on a copy of the Criterion by now. Alas, I'm stranded on a mountain without a single toboggan to ride myself down to the video rental store on. |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by crumbsroom (Post 2169194)
I do really want to see Chimes of Midnight, regardless though. If it wasn't for the pandemic I would have definitely got my hands on a copy of the Criterion by now. Alas, I'm stranded on a mountain without a single toboggan to ride myself down to the video rental store on.
|
F For Fake
The Other Side of the Wind Not really a ranking so much as recognizing these films as in a different category of filmmaking than the "classic" Welles. Fake would still be a favorite, probably, as a playful romp through media-myth conducted by one of the century's great myth-masters. Unique as either a documentary and more subversively avant-garde than Godard at his wankiest. So it was fascinating to see that this filmmaking style was more than just a singular experiment, for what was then seen as a toss-off vanity project that few people saw, and what could have been a bold new approach to narrative filmmaking as manifested in Other Side of the Wind, where the similar motifs of media-manipulation and themes of myth-making are applied to a quasi-autobiographical account of the gulf between fantasy and reality. These films may or may not be Welles' best, and I may have some recency bias in my still being awed at this most recent discovery, and/or the small miracle of its salvation. But they are so distinct from the rest of Welles' catalogue that it feels like remnants of an unrealized renaissance. But so many of Welles' films now rest on projections of their potential, as he has one of the most savagely butchered filmographies in Hollywood. We're missing nearly a third of Ambersons, while Mr. Arkadin and Touch of Evil can only be approximated to Welles' vision as he wasn't allowed to complete their editing. Many more were underfunded. Othello is gorgeous, but they couldn't afford decent post-prouction audio. Add to that the projects that the otherwise prolific director was unable to get off the ground, the cost of what was effectively a studio blacklist. If I had to rank the rest.... Lady From Shanghai Othello Chimes At Midnight Touch Of Evil Citizen Kane Macbeth Magnificent Ambersons The Trial The Stranger Mr. Arkadin And I'm glad no one has yet complained about Immortal Story not being on the list. You can take that French television elsewhere. |
Oh geez. Didn’t even notice The Immortal Story wasn’t there. It should be, even if it had been released to Television first, it did get a belated (iirc) release in theatres.
Not sure why it shouldn’t count. |
Re: Best Orson Welles
Because the poll maxes out at twelve choices.
|
Originally Posted by Holden Pike (Post 2169345)
Because the poll maxes out at twelve choices.
|
Re: Best Orson Welles
I went Kane, but I feel Touch of Evil is close. A rewatch needed for both too.
It will be cool to see a few of these I haven't seen, the only one I've seen and didn't care for was F for Fake |
All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:25 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright, ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Movie Forums