Movie Forums (http://www.movieforums.com/community/index.php)
-   Upcoming Movies & Sequels (http://www.movieforums.com/community/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   World War Z (http://www.movieforums.com/community/showthread.php?t=17615)

St.Pete Zombie 10-28-08 03:59 PM

World War Z
 
Based off of Max Brooks Novel (same author who wrote "The Zombie Survival Guide"

Plot: Ten years after the human victory over the world wide Zombie epidemic, referred to as World War Z, Max Brooks scours the world collecting the stories and experiences of those who have survived the conflict that almost eradicated humanity.

Its scheduled to come out in 2010 -_- , but I do hope hollywood comes through with this one.

Also, I would love to see Brian Keene's books, "The Rising" and "City of the Dead" on the big screen. :)

Mr. Metro 10-28-08 06:19 PM

Re: World War Z
 
I read the book and I loved it. This will be something I am keeping an eye out for.

Iroquois 10-28-08 11:48 PM

Re: World War Z
 
As much as I love the book, I wonder how it can really work on the big screen. It's way too epic and the constant changing of character could be confusing for far too much of the audience to be worthwhile. It'd be simpler to just do another "bunch of survivors stuck in a random place" style zombie movie.

St.Pete Zombie 10-29-08 01:14 AM

Re: World War Z
 
Originally Posted by Iroquois (Post 472084)
As much as I love the book, I wonder how it can really work on the big screen. It's way too epic and the constant changing of character could be confusing for far too much of the audience to be worthwhile. It'd be simpler to just do another "bunch of survivors stuck in a random place" style zombie movie.
Good point, but the "survivors stuck in a random place style zombie movie" has been done to death:sick:. This is a interesting concept if they can get a good script made. I could see this as a 2 to 2:30 hour movie at most.

Another zombie movie I would love to see made is "When Zombies Attack" based off the short movies on the net and comic series. Its sorta like COPS, but with zombies

Heres the link to the web video
http://www.spike.com/video/when-zombies-attack/2402880

And the link to the comic
http://www.horrortalk.com/reviews/Wh...biesAttack.htm

Iroquois 10-29-08 01:33 AM

Re: World War Z
 
Originally Posted by St.Pete Zombie (Post 472105)
Good point, but the "survivors stuck in a random place style zombie movie" has been done to death:sick:.
I know, I'm just playing devil's advocate here. There's a reason horror films tend to be low-budget and small-scale - because most people don't like horror or would prefer action or comedy. Horror movies (and especially zombie movies) have a rather limited appeal and therefore no producer is going to want to spend large amounts of money financing an epic horror movie if it means less people will come to it than, say, action or comedy.

Mr. Metro 10-29-08 07:39 PM

Re: World War Z
 
Originally Posted by St.Pete Zombie (Post 472105)
Good point, but the "survivors stuck in a random place style zombie movie" has been done to death:sick:. This is a interesting concept if they can get a good script made. I could see this as a 2 to 2:30 hour movie at most.

Another zombie movie I would love to see made is "When Zombies Attack" based off the short movies on the net and comic series. Its sorta like COPS, but with zombies

Heres the link to the web video
http://www.spike.com/video/when-zombies-attack/2402880

And the link to the comic
http://www.horrortalk.com/reviews/Wh...biesAttack.htm
Interesting...
I loved the video! ;)

planet news 07-29-10 11:22 PM

Re: World War Z
 
Brad Pitt's staring in it. I do approve.

http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2010/07/21...orded-attacks/

Slapdash Jelly 07-30-10 04:17 AM

Re: World War Z
 
I'm kinda pessimistic about this one. The magic of the novel lies in its documentary-feel. I wonder if it will do good for the movie if it also lean towards that path. You know, ala District 9, or the first half of District 9.

Yoda 07-30-10 12:41 PM

Re: World War Z
 
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. I assume it will. An early incarnation of the script was reviewed on Ain't It Cool News years ago, I believe, and the reviewer had some kind of hyperbole about the something-or-other (fill in serious drama here) of zombie movies, which was encouraging, to say the least. Whether or not they can pull it off remains to be seen, but the ceiling for this flick is that it could absolutely step outside the genre a bit and exist as a legitimate, interesting dramatic film. The book's tone makes that possible, whereas most zombie films don't aspire to anything near that.

I'm fairly optimistic about this. It's been a long time coming, it's not some sudden smash hit they slapped together to capitalize on a passing craze. I'm actually not sure about Pitt, but I imagine they can ugly him up enough, depending on which role he's playing.

Yonkers, of course, will have to be the film's centerpiece sequence.

At this point, I'm really just wondering if they can blend a more traditional narrative into the documentary, like District 9, or if they'll try to use it the whole way through. There are a million choices about how to construct the film, really; do they use faux found footage? Documentary crews? Or do they just inexplicably have the footage, as if we're only seeing a visualization of the things each interviewee is describing? The last gives us the best look at the whole world, and it's a conceit I think audiences would accept.

Slapdash Jelly 08-03-10 03:13 AM

Re: World War Z
 
Maybe Pitt will portray Max Brooks himself, then we'll know if the film will take the documentary-path.

Yoda 08-03-10 11:15 AM

Re: World War Z
 
The phrasing there is confusing me; he will, but then we'll know? Is there an omitted "if"?

Slapdash Jelly 08-03-10 10:41 PM

Re: World War Z
 
Sorry, almighty Yoda. Grammatical error on my part is inevitable. It shall be an "if". :)

n3wt 08-04-10 11:36 AM

Re: World War Z
 
Ive read up on this and it sounds real interesting, I should really read the book before the film comes out.

Yoda 08-04-10 11:41 AM

Re: World War Z
 
Originally Posted by Slapdash Jelly (Post 651923)
Sorry, almighty Yoda. Grammatical error on my part is inevitable. It shall be an "if". :)
Sorry, didn't mean to sound pedantic, just wondered if it was a matter of "Brad Pitt's cast as Brooks, let's see if that means this" or "if Brad Pitt is cast as Brooks, it will mean this." I dig now.

And I agree, by the by.

Sleezy 08-04-10 01:28 PM

Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 649211)
Whether or not they can pull it off remains to be seen, but the ceiling for this flick is that it could absolutely step outside the genre a bit and exist as a legitimate, interesting dramatic film.
This reminds me of the Gareth Edwards film Monsters, which screened at Cannes last year. According to all who have seen it, the film uses the creature genre as a distant backdrop to tell a more subtle and legitimately heartfelt story. I can't wait to see it, and I love how Indie directors are taking this new approach to horror/sci-fi genres.

akatemple 08-17-11 02:04 PM

Nobody has posted on this in a while so there is some news, Brad Pitt will be playing the part of Gerry Lane. The movie has a 125,000,000 budget which seems huge for a zombie film.

The shoot of World War Z has moved to Glasgow, and the first set photos have popped up online...
A week or two back, the movie adaptation of Max BrooksWorld War Z was filming down in Cornwall, here in Blighty. Now, though, the production has moved up to Glasgow, as the city is being transformed to look like Philadelphia.
The film stars Brad Pitt, and is being directed by Marc Forster. And the latest on-set shots from the film have come courtesy of Glasgow City Council’s Twitter feed (thanks to Den Of Geek reader Edimonster for the tip), which show the Americanisation of the city.
There’s no sign yet of Pitt and company, but expect shots of them at work to follow in the days ahead. World War Z, meanwhile, is scheduled for December 21st 2012.
Set pictures here.

will.15 08-17-11 02:21 PM

Re: World War Z
 
Here is some sample dailogue:

"General Patton, the zombies have landed at Normandy." And they have eaten Montgomery."

MovieMan8877445 08-17-11 02:22 PM

Re: World War Z
 
Ha, I love the release date.

Yoda 08-17-11 02:39 PM

Re: World War Z
 
Why? Proximity to Christmas or something?

will.15 08-17-11 02:44 PM

Re: World War Z
 
Much better will be the planned It's a Wonderful Z Life. Clarence is too late to save George Bailey because he bent down to tie his shoes and George comes back as a zombie and eats everyone in town except Potter because his crippling arthritis makes him taste bad.

MovieMan8877445 08-17-11 02:49 PM

Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 755315)
Why? Proximity to Christmas or something?
December 21st, 2012 is the supposed date of the end of the world.

will.15 08-17-11 02:54 PM

Re: World War Z
 
If the world ends on that day due to a zombie invasion, the movie won't do well at the box office because zombies don't have money.

akatemple 08-17-11 02:59 PM

Re: World War Z
 
It will also suck cause the 22nd is my birthday.

akatemple 08-26-11 07:16 PM

Re: World War Z
 
I think these are new. Newish set photos from the film.

http://shocktillyoudrop.com/nextraim...ockwwz824a.jpg

http://shocktillyoudrop.com/nextraim...ockwwz824b.jpg

http://shocktillyoudrop.com/nextraim...ockwwz824c.jpg

http://shocktillyoudrop.com/nextraim...ockwwz824d.jpg

akatemple 08-26-11 07:25 PM

Re: World War Z
 
2 more Zombie set pics.

http://shocktillyoudrop.com/nextraim...ombie-wwz1.jpg

http://shocktillyoudrop.com/nextraim...ombie-wwz2.jpg

akatemple 09-06-11 06:03 PM

World War Z zombies burst through car windscreen and attack driver.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ma8l5udOlvc&feature=player_embedded

filmgirlinterrupted 09-06-11 08:24 PM

Re: World War Z
 
Dear god I am looking forward to this.

The Rodent 11-07-12 07:33 AM

Re: World War Z
 
Bump!

More news from The Rodent... new poster has been revealed. Release date is June 21st 2013.

http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=35701

http://www.comingsoon.net/gallery/50...ld_War_Z_1.jpg

TheUsualSuspect 11-08-12 10:59 PM

Re: World War Z
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcwTxRuq-uk

Thoughts?

A: I thought the Inception Brang was played out already...looks like I was wrong.

b: This doesn't really look anything like the book.

shlomi 11-09-12 07:00 AM

LOL, IDF soldiers everywhere.

Old jerusalem is on fire:

http://2012.uploaded.fresh.co.il/201...9/15526659.jpg

IDF kill zombies:

http://2012.uploaded.fresh.co.il/201...9/29232347.jpg

Israeli rambo:

http://2012.uploaded.fresh.co.il/201...9/18483921.jpg

Brad pitt helps IDF:

http://2012.uploaded.fresh.co.il/201...9/33604432.jpg

gandalf26 11-09-12 07:59 AM

I heard a while back that they switched Director halfway through or rewrote a lot of it. That doesn't usually bode well imo.

CloseToHome 11-12-12 11:57 PM

Re: World War Z
 
28 Days Later zombies on steroids.

Austruck 11-14-12 12:12 PM

Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 755315)
Why? Proximity to Christmas or something?
Perhaps we weren't close enough to this year's Mayan apocalypse for you to have gotten that release date last year when you posted this... or were you being coy? ;)

Here's a link to a blog post by a local writer (well, local to ME) who writes about zombies and monsters, etc. He too is hoping WWZ doesn't disappoint:

http://claywrites.com/world-war-z/

Austruck 11-14-12 01:25 PM

Re: World War Z
 
Oh, I LOVE the comment below the blog post by a guy named Blake. The "fake conversation" about how to do the movie is spot-on and hilarious. :)

wonkywonk 11-22-12 09:42 PM

Re: World War Z
 
Can't wait for this movie. It looks promising, but the zombies are super retarded. They swarm like ants and run at the speed of light. The weird thing is that the zombies run together and topple of each other like a wave or something. In the trailer, the scene where the zombies tried climbing over the barricade is just sick

Iroquois 11-22-12 10:10 PM

Re: World War Z
 
Good thing my expectations were low, otherwise I'd think that trailer was a huge disappointment.

FilmBuffDave 11-25-12 07:28 AM

Re: World War Z
 
I'm pretty worried about this movie. I'll watch anything with zombies but this seems almost more like Independence Day than a zombie movie.

kinosis 11-26-12 12:21 PM

Re: World War Z
 
That trailer did not make me have much confidence in this film. I don't think I will be seeing it unless it just gets amazing reviews.

akatemple 03-27-13 02:22 AM

2nd trailer for World War Z....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EC7P5WdUko

Iroquois 04-09-13 09:39 AM

Re: World War Z
 
Well, that didn't get my hopes up.

Masterman 04-09-13 10:11 AM

Ime going to treat this as a prequel to I Am Legend.

Nausicaä 04-09-13 01:13 PM

Re: World War Z
 
They were vampires in I Am Legend, not zombies.

Cobpyth 04-09-13 01:20 PM

This seems like another uninteresting apocalyptic blockbuster about zombies (yet again) and a vehicle for Brad Pitt to earn some big money, so he can do some other good, less paying quality projects.

These kind of films just have to exist, I'm afraid.

Satine 05-02-13 11:38 AM

Originally Posted by Iroquois (Post 472107)
I know, I'm just playing devil's advocate here. There's a reason horror films tend to be low-budget and small-scale - because most people don't like horror or would prefer action or comedy. Horror movies (and especially zombie movies) have a rather limited appeal and therefore no producer is going to want to spend large amounts of money financing an epic horror movie if it means less people will come to it than, say, action or comedy.
I think a few years ago, you'd be right but The Walking Dead is hugely successful. It's the perfect time for a Zombie Blockbuster. :)

Iroquois 05-03-13 08:17 AM

Originally Posted by Satine (Post 901821)
I think a few years ago, you'd be right but The Walking Dead is hugely successful. It's the perfect time for a Zombie Blockbuster. :)
Well, that post you quoted was literally from a few years ago and I didn't anticipate The Walking Dead becoming a TV show at all, let alone a successful one. However, there's no denying that there's quite a bit of difference between both that show and what World War Z is shaping up to be. For instance, Walking Dead still sticks to the "small group of survivors" formula and has slow zombies and quite a bit of violence, whereas World War Z looks like a Roland Emmerich disaster movie with blurry faceless masses of running zombies and is apparently headed for a PG-13 rating, which doesn't exactly bode well.

The Gunslinger45 05-03-13 08:22 AM

Re: World War Z
 
Zombies do not make for good PG 13 material. They should be R or released unrated like the original Night of the Living Dead, Dawn and Day of the Dead.

Iroquois 05-03-13 11:41 AM

Originally Posted by The Gunslinger45 (Post 901990)
Zombies do not make for good PG 13 material. They should be R or released unrated like the original Night of the Living Dead, Dawn and Day of the Dead.
Yeah, they should have thought of that before making a summer blockbuster with a nine-figure budget.

gandalf26 05-03-13 11:54 AM

Originally Posted by The Gunslinger45 (Post 901990)
Zombies do not make for good PG 13 material. They should be R or released unrated like the original Night of the Living Dead, Dawn and Day of the Dead.
Neither should the Hunger Games. Totally agree with you.

The Gunslinger45 05-03-13 11:55 AM

Re: World War Z
 
And the production hell this movie has been in will probably mean it is going to be bad. Hell in the trailers Brad Pitt seems to be on autopilot. And given the CGI fest I have seen from the trailers, this is defiantly going to have CGI gore. I hate CGI gore in a horror movie! Someone hire Tom Savini dammit!

gandalf26 05-03-13 11:57 AM

Also Marc Forster is the director. He did that pile of **** Bond movie, Quontam of Solace.

The Gunslinger45 05-03-13 11:59 AM

Re: World War Z
 
But that being said, I will end up seeing this movie, if only to rip it a new one when I am done.

Iroquois 05-03-13 11:59 AM

Originally Posted by The Gunslinger45 (Post 902018)
And the production hell this movie has been in will probably mean it is going to be bad. Hell in the trailers Brad Pitt seems to be on autopilot. And given the CGI fest I have seen from the trailers, this is defiantly going to have CGI gore. I hate CGI gore in a horror movie! Someone hire Tom Savini dammit!
Given the PG-13 rating, there's probably going to be next to no gore anyway.

The Gunslinger45 05-03-13 12:00 PM

Originally Posted by gandalf26 (Post 902019)
Also Marc Forster is the director. He did that pile of **** Bond movie, Quontam of Solace.
Not going to lie I did not see that movie. Not a Daniel Craig Bond fan.

The Gunslinger45 05-03-13 12:03 PM

Originally Posted by Iroquois (Post 902022)
Given the PG-13 rating, there's probably going to be next to no gore anyway.
You have a point. So even if there is any gore, it is going to be CGI. Which only adds to my beef with this film. Why a PG-13 zombie fest? Oh yeah, so they can market it to teens too! Mother ****ers!

Iroquois 05-03-13 12:58 PM

Originally Posted by The Gunslinger45 (Post 902026)
You have a point. So even if there is any gore, it is going to be CGI. Which only adds to my beef with this film. Why a PG-13 zombie fest? Oh yeah, so they can market it to teens too! Mother ****ers!
Considering the nine-figure budget they're apparently working with, it makes sense that they'd appeal to as many demographics as possible in order to make their money back. Granted, Terminator 3 had an R-rating and also had a budget of nearly US$200m but that was built on a well-established property so people were guaranteed to see it.

The Gunslinger45 05-03-13 01:12 PM

Originally Posted by Iroquois (Post 902035)
Considering the nine-figure budget they're apparently working with, it makes sense that they'd appeal to as many demographics as possible in order to make their money back. Granted, Terminator 3 had an R-rating and also had a budget of nearly US$200m but that was built on a well-established property so people were guaranteed to see it.
Agreed. But since this is based off a very popular book which should be the target audience, why not respect them? Scale the budget back and do something on a smaller scale? Have it rated R, practical gore, and have a more simple story. Hell pay homage to the book; have a bunch of different stories from across the globe in little vignettes. That seems to be a better idea then this, as you said, Roland Emmerich cluster ****! Sure then it would not be the summer blockbuster they want, but at least then it would have a much better chance of being a good movie!

Iroquois 05-03-13 01:20 PM

Originally Posted by The Gunslinger45 (Post 902037)
Agreed. But since this is based off a very popular book which should be the target audience, why not respect them? Scale the budget back and do something on a smaller scale? Have it rated R, practical gore, and have a more simple story. Hell pay homage to the book; have a bunch of different stories from across the nation in little vignettes. That seems to be a better idea then this, as you said, Roland Emmerich cluster ****! Sure then it would not be the summer blockbuster they want, but at least then it would have a much better chance of being a good movie!
Presumably because it's not profitable. I can't shake the feeling that the script is more or less totally original but the whole "unfolding zombie pandemic" scenario was made well-known by the book; in theory, this leads the producers to buy up the rights to the book's title because it's easier to deal with fans of the book complaining about an unfaithful adaptation than those same fans saying their movie is a straight rip-off of the book's premise. At least, that's the reasoning that makes sense to me when I come across an adaptation that discards virtually everything about its source save for the title and certain key story elements (e.g. the Dawn of the Dead remake, where the only thing it has in common with the original is that it takes place in a shopping mall).

The Gunslinger45 05-03-13 01:32 PM

Re: World War Z
 
I do see where you are coming from. But if the movie is going to be named World War Z, it should have some connection to the book aside from the name. And as we have agreed, if you are going to tackle zombies, go for the hard R.

Also interesting note: I saw the Dawn of the dead remake before I saw the original; and I still say the original is better, and is one of my favorite movies. Though I will defend the remake as a good movie, and an example of a good remake.

MovieBuffering 05-03-13 01:35 PM

Re: World War Z
 
ahhh not trolling here, but I'm so sick of Zombies. I'm boycotting anything Zombie related. Unless they make a Zombieland sequel, I enjoyed that movie, but haven't seen anything Zombie related since. Studios are just so lazy anymore. I can see the conversations now.

Studio Head 1 - "Let's make a movie about college"
Studio Head 2 - "Well how will we make it profitable for us?"
Studio Head 1 - "Duh, make it Zombie University"
Studio Head 2 - "Yea those idiots will see anything with a Zombie in it"
Studio Head 1 - "Cha-Ching"

Dash 05-09-13 04:40 AM

Re: World War Z
 
Even as someone who is a bit of a closet zombie-ite I'm lacking any particular urge to go and see this film. If it even manages to find its way through the production issues it's still having.

I tend to agree with, MovieBuffering, studios are becoming lazy, and there is a monumental lack of originality. One studio makes a comic book movie...everyone else jumps on the bandwagon. Make a fairytale movie, of course, everyone else follows. And so it goes...

gandalf26 05-09-13 01:11 PM

Re: World War Z
 
Went out and bought the book the other day. Really enjoying it so far. Would propably be a great movie if they followed the style of the book, a series of interviews and flashbacks, a little bit like District 9.

Austruck 05-09-13 02:27 PM

Re: World War Z
 
Dash, and if that's not bad enough, they don't just make one comic book movie... they make remakes. How many Spider-Man movie versions have we seen? Batman? Superman? The Hulk? Do we need remakes of these things? And remakes of remakes?

But at least this is based on a book that was semi-original in its scope. However, none of the trailers give me any hope that it's going to have the same docu-drama feel of the book. :(

MovieBuffering 05-11-13 08:08 AM

Originally Posted by Austruck (Post 903576)
Dash, and if that's not bad enough, they don't just make one comic book movie... they make remakes. How many Spider-Man movie versions have we seen? Batman? Superman? The Hulk? Do we need remakes of these things? And remakes of remakes?

But at least this is based on a book that was semi-original in its scope. However, none of the trailers give me any hope that it's going to have the same docu-drama feel of the book. :(
Ahh I refused to see the new Spidermans. Throwing my money at it means I support this recycled material I literally just saw. Talk about a pointless re-boot. While i'm not against re-booting a comic book movie give it some freaking time. They ruined Batman by trying to money grab after the 80s movies doing the Clooney, Kilmer batmans. They stashed it for a decade and took their time with it and made 3 kick-ass movies.

Let the movies breathe and give sometime for a filmmaker to put a different interpretation on the characters. Like Nolan with Batman.

NECornbread 05-11-13 09:26 PM

Re: World War Z
 
The movie looks like it's going to have very little in common with the novel (which is too bad). Still, I am a big fan of the genre so despite the fact I have sever misgivings about the final project, I will still check it out. Something tells me it's not going to do so hot at the box office.

Dash 05-13-13 12:41 AM

Originally Posted by Austruck (Post 903576)
Dash, and if that's not bad enough, they don't just make one comic book movie... they make remakes. How many Spider-Man movie versions have we seen? Batman? Superman? The Hulk? Do we need remakes of these things? And remakes of remakes?

But at least this is based on a book that was semi-original in its scope. However, none of the trailers give me any hope that it's going to have the same docu-drama feel of the book. :(
So very true, Austruck.

I must own that I have never read the book that the film is based on. I do think I'll be waiting for this one to hit Blu-Ray down the track before I see it.

The Rodent 05-22-13 02:43 PM

Re: World War Z
 
http://www.shocktillyoudrop.com/news...ng-world-war-z

Apparently 3 new TV Spots released within the past 24 hours.

JL4207 05-23-13 03:26 AM

Re: World War Z
 
I love me some zombie movies, so I don't care what criticism the movie is getting, I'm psyched to see World War Z. I don't care if it doesn't follow the book closely, so long as it's enjoyable. Admittedly, I've never read the book, though. But I would like to eventually get around to it. Might wait until after watching the movie, though.

dadgumblah 05-24-13 02:18 AM

I'm looking forward to it, despite my love of the book. It looks pretty good to me from the trailer.

Satans Puppet 06-09-13 04:07 PM

Saw it the other day.

Liked it but it's nothing like the book!

teeter_g 06-10-13 07:05 PM

Re: World War Z
 
I can't wait to see this movie! I am pretty excited about this one, even if it is Brad Pitt.

Dash 06-12-13 06:32 PM

Re: World War Z
 
Off to see World War Z this coming weekend.

Despite reports of the film being far removed from the book I'm still looking forward to it.

thethirstymonkeys 06-16-13 05:52 PM

Re: World War Z
 
I'm just about to read this book for this. Well, I'll probably wait until after I watch the movie. Books are usually way better, so it just makes the movie seem worse. But I definitely look forward to watching WWZ.

n3wt 06-17-13 12:31 PM

Re: World War Z
 
I have started the book as I love 'The Zombie Survival Guide' and this looks great but I have heard its nothing like the book :/ Either way I dont care it has zombies in it.

Nausicaä 06-17-13 06:01 PM

Re: World War Z
 
^ Love that Zombie Survival Guide book. :D

drkwrld 06-17-13 06:36 PM

Re: World War Z
 
I wanna see the movie, will look into buying the book as well. Who's the author?

Nausicaä 06-17-13 07:16 PM

Re: World War Z
 
Max Brooks.

gandalf26 06-17-13 07:22 PM

Re: World War Z
 
The Book is so good that I read twice within a month. I don't recall doing that with books or movies for ages.

rryanhall 06-18-13 08:04 AM

Originally Posted by teeter_g (Post 911849)
I can't wait to see this movie! I am pretty excited about this one, even if it is Brad Pitt.
Here is the same situation :) can't wait the rest days.
Already read book which excited me to watch full.
Surely going to see....

n3wt 06-18-13 09:39 AM

Originally Posted by Nausicaä (Post 913615)
^ Love that Zombie Survival Guide book. :D
Its a great book! :highfive:

yellowjacket1 06-20-13 12:12 PM

Originally Posted by Dash (Post 912318)
Off to see World War Z this coming weekend.

Despite reports of the film being far removed from the book I'm still looking forward to it.
I never read the book so that matters little to me. The trailer actually was impressive. I'm surprised but this may actually be a good film. We'll all know soon.

n3wt 06-25-13 09:38 AM

Re: World War Z
 
World War Z is doing very well in the US this week, I believe its number 2.

Also I read they are planning a sequel to it all ready.

The Gunslinger45 06-25-13 09:53 AM

Re: World War Z
 
I hope there is not a sequel. This movie was awful!

n3wt 06-25-13 10:07 AM

Re: World War Z
 
In related news, The Hollywood Reporter says that Paramount and Brad Pitt will actively turn to developing a sequel after the film's $111.8 million worldwide opening this weekend. The movie earned $66 million domestically and $45.8 million overseas. It was made for $190 million.
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=105784

The Gunslinger45 06-25-13 10:08 AM

Re: World War Z
 
Dammit! Still a sh!tty movie so f**k me seeing the sequel.

n3wt 06-25-13 10:12 AM

Re: World War Z
 
I havent seen it yet so I'll let you know what I think of it :yup:

Bond007 06-25-13 10:23 AM

Originally Posted by n3wt (Post 916420)
World War Z is doing very well in the US this week, I believe its number 2.

Also I read they are planning a sequel to it all ready.
I watched an interview with Brad Pitt and he alluded to, that it has the makings of a trilogy and more.

n3wt 06-25-13 10:54 AM

Originally Posted by Bond007 (Post 916439)
I watched an interview with Brad Pitt and he alluded to, that it has the makings of a trilogy and more.
Cool, I like anything with zombies :D Hope I like this film, The trailers look badass :yup:

josephay 06-27-13 06:57 PM

I think it'll be exciting but zombie stuff is not my thing. I might go see it but I don't expect to love it. I'm more excited to see White House Down.

FatalSyn 07-06-13 10:35 PM

I'm interested in seeing how this movie turns out.

MovieFan31 07-12-13 01:06 PM

Originally Posted by FatalSyn (Post 921221)
I'm interested in seeing how this movie turns out.
Me too, the trailer genuinely frightened me.

WoOdWoRk 07-17-13 04:10 PM

Re: World War Z
 
Havn't seen it yet but with a PG-13 rating and zombies that look like I Am Legend vampires it's probably a disaster.

-IMO great zombie movies can either do slow or fast zombies

Dawn of the Dead remake was a great example of a redone classic done well. That **** was scary

Walking dead zombies also work and are just as scary.

I grew up watching Romero and Fulci zombie movies and where i see it now, Why dont you have the rotting dead be slow and the fresh dead be fast? albeit their legs still intact.


All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:38 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright, ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Movie Forums