Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...ushpmg00000024
Steve Martin posted this tweet about Carrie Fisher... http://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/...2f00e9d652.png New York Magazine criticized him, and US Weekly. Oh the great outcry against this huge injustice done against womens rights, what she wanted to be remembered for, blah blah blah...... Steve Martin deleted the Tweet. See the difference between Steve Martin and the rest of us.......he actually knew her! http://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/...che=kychonu2tc People today do not have the life experience they think they do to be preaching the rights and wrong of an old mans tweet about a friend who died. This has gotten way worse as social media exploded into the mainstream. People seek approval, and acknowledgement in life, and the internet is a quick-fix which was never available before. Be it here, Facebook, Twitter, or wherever the goal mostly is to get that "Like", Thumbs-up, Retweet, etc.... so if anyone says or does something that could be taken the wrong way, it usually is for the sake of some false sense of heroics. Europeans dont act this way, Aussies dont either. This is an American culture thing which is fueling the "fake news" movement, catering to intellects which dont know the difference between reality tv and reality. You know whats sad, today a show like "All In The Family" couldnt stay on the air. The dumb would be outraged about Archie Bunker saying he promotes racism, and sexism, blah blah blah http://bingeout.com/wp-content/uploa...34-750x400.jpg It was a show about us. People. How we all bitch, do stupid things, have stupid beliefs, and get along with each other regardless. Because we were mature enough then to "get it". Now we arent. Weve gone backwards. I do not like this SJW Idiocracy, and miss the good ol' days. More specifically I miss how people were back then. Just because weve become more judgemental on each other doesnt mean weve evolved in any way. |
Yeah, this is definitely based on some twisted thinking. Not only did he not just call her pretty (which is a perfectly fine thing to say and in no way implies that beauty is everything, or that she did not have other qualities), he specifically contrasted his initial, superficial impressions with the more meaningful things he discovered about her later.
This isn't surprising, however. There are more reasonable forms of political correctness, but the strain based primarily in shaming and purging the less "pure" will inevitably, like an increasingly splintered religious sect, end up attacking even its allies. |
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
Carrie Fisher would have been touched in a good way from Martins tweet, and certainly would have gotten the humor in it. She believed strongly in womens rights, but was able to have a sense of humor too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZ97s396kb0 Ive a feeling she wasnt "politically correct" ;) |
Originally Posted by TONGO (Post 1620749)
It was a show about us. People. How we all bitch, do stupid things, have stupid beliefs, and get along with each other regardless.
It has become a pastime to parse sentences in search of ways to be offended. For some it's a career. Monkey chatter. Mostly meaningless and serves only to belittle those making an issue of it. |
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
Sounds like an innocent compliment to me. People are lame.
|
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
Cinnabon deleted a tweet as well.
“RIP Carrie Fisher, you’ll always have the best buns in the galaxy.” |
Originally Posted by TheUsualSuspect (Post 1620775)
Cinnabon deleted a tweet as well.
“RIP Carrie Fisher, you’ll always have the best buns in the galaxy.” Steve Martin's tweet was kind and respectful. People can be such idiots if they had a problem with what Steve Martin said. |
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
They even attacked Paul Simon (who was married to her) because he called her a "girl" in his tweet and not a "woman".
Luckily, the outrages against the 'politically correct' reactions far outweigh the actual 'politically correct' reactions. |
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
Empty gestures.
|
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
I dont really think anyone is outraged,its just sensationlized-like everything else in the media.
|
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
lol @ the strange rant about All in the Family
|
Originally Posted by TONGO (Post 1620749)
People today do not have the life experience they think they do to be preaching the rights and wrong of an old mans tweet about a friend who died.
This has gotten way worse as social media exploded into the mainstream. People seek approval, and acknowledgement in life, and the internet is a quick-fix which was never available before. Be it here, Facebook, Twitter, or wherever the goal mostly is to get that "Like", Thumbs-up, Retweet, etc.... so if anyone says or does something that could be taken the wrong way, it usually is for the sake of some false sense of heroics.
Europeans dont act this way, Aussies dont either. This is an American culture thing which is fueling the "fake news" movement, catering to intellects which dont know the difference between reality tv and reality.
You know whats sad, today a show like "All In The Family" couldnt stay on the air. The dumb would be outraged about Archie Bunker saying he promotes racism, and sexism, blah blah blah
It was a show about us. People. How we all bitch, do stupid things, have stupid beliefs, and get along with each other regardless. Because we were mature enough then to "get it". Now we arent. Weve gone backwards.
I do not like this SJW Idiocracy, and miss the good ol' days. More specifically I miss how people were back then. Just because weve become more judgemental on each other doesnt mean weve evolved in any way.
|
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
Rather than PC, I call this people being dumb and unable to understand a joke, as always.
|
Allow me to introduce you to an obscure little show called Family Guy.
I agree that the joke this thread was about wasn't offensive at all and people completely overreacted to it but the thread title and subsequent posts are ridiculous; i mean "Ive a feeling she wasnt "politically correct" ;)" as if being 'politically correct' whatever that means is some horrible thing? And all from old white guys who miss the good old days? :sick: This should've been a post in the Chill Club or a Shout with a few responses, the fact that this is a thread with such an insulting title is hilarious. Anyway: Camo/Cosmic 2016 :laugh: |
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
well its easy to miss the "good ol days" when youre a white middle aged man though ;) horrible stuff when you actually have to have some consideration for others
|
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
There's nothing wrong at all with Steve Martin's tweet - it's very well-written and poignantly expressed what he felt and wanted to say. I'm just sorry he also felt the need or was harassed enough to take it down.
|
Just because offense is taken by someone doesn't mean that the other party meant any offense. Consideration and understanding needs to go both ways.
|
About my last post: i think people reminiscing for the good old days is pretty sad personally and it will probably be me some day which depresses me.
The idea that one ridiculous thing is enough to call the whole idea of political correctness out is ridiculous and offensive. Offensive because you are deciding on a few isolated occurrences that are ridiculed by most that people with hard-ships shouldn't be backed up. It's as offensive as claiming that the gun-toting, racist, sexist, christian is a solid representation of American Christians. And it is ridiculous because it is grouping a vast amount of people probably including yourself on some subjects into a 'politically correct' bracket without considering what their individual opinions are. |
Originally Posted by cricket (Post 1620933)
Just because offense is taken by someone doesn't mean that the other party meant any offense. Consideration and understanding needs to go both ways.
|
Originally Posted by Camo (Post 1620936)
The other party doesn't get to decide what is and isn't offensive to the other person, that's the problem. If he genuinely caused offense to that person then it was his problem, i avoid that by not being offensive to people personally.
|
Originally Posted by cricket (Post 1620937)
The people who are offended are not even the person he was talking about. It was a very innocent tweet. Is it better that everyone is ultra-careful about what they say, just because they may offend someone? It was really Martin's problem that some people were bothered by it?
I really don't care as much as i'd imagine you think i do; i just think this is a horrible thread. |
Originally Posted by Camo (Post 1620940)
i just think this is a horrible thread.
Sexy Celebrity & Gatsby President & Vice President of Movie Forums 2017 VOTE for Us and STOP the Bullsh*t. |
It is something that is very common now, and I think a lot of it boils down to a gang mentality on social media. There's so many miserable people out there.
|
By the way, my post in this thread was just about the tweet and people being upset about the tweet. I didn't actually read the original post.
I will say that posts like this make me uncomfortable though.
Originally Posted by Topsy (Post 1620925)
well its easy to miss the "good ol days" when youre a white middle aged man though ;) horrible stuff when you actually have to have some consideration for others
|
Originally Posted by jiraffejustin (Post 1620945)
By the way, my post in this thread was just about the tweet and people being upset about the tweet. I didn't actually read the original post.
I will say that posts like this make me uncomfortable though. It seems counterproductive to refer to someone's race or sex as a way to define them, their feelings, or their actions. It's also lazy. Is it just because he's a white male that he feels that way? Or is it something else? I am sure there are many white males who don't think like him. So why just point out his race or sex and just say that's why he feels that way? |
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
bc someone who is opposed to the idea of PC,and is male and is white,it is most likely...because its a male who is white.
whyyyy? probably because they dont have to deal with the issues why PC is requiered. |
Originally Posted by Topsy (Post 1620949)
bc someone who is opposed to the idea of PC,and is male and is white,it is most likely...because its a male who is white.
whyyyy? probably because they dont have to deal with the issues why PC is requiered. |
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
I don't think a person's race or sex is the reason for anything. People are people, they aren't defined by what they are born as.
|
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
oh none,sexism and rascism dont exist at all.
|
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
It's a privilege thing, really. The implied reason why white males would want things to go back to the "good old days" is to reclaim the sort of power and status that they feel has been lost because they've had to accommodate people who are different to them (non-white, non-male, etc.).
|
Originally Posted by Topsy (Post 1620952)
oh none,sexism and rascism dont exist at all.
|
Originally Posted by Topsy (Post 1620949)
bc someone who is opposed to the idea of PC,and is male and is white,it is most likely...because its a male who is white.
whyyyy? probably because they dont have to deal with the issues why PC is requiered. |
Originally Posted by Iroquois (Post 1620953)
It's a privilege thing, really. The implied reason why white males would want things to go back to the "good old days" is to reclaim the sort of power and status that they feel has been lost because they've had to accommodate people who are different to them (non-white, non-male, etc.).
|
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
Maybe it's because I am a white male, but I am uncomfortable when someone judges someone and assumes they are a certain way because of their race (or gender)
|
Originally Posted by cricket (Post 1620954)
Only white men are racist and sexist? What world are you living in?
|
Originally Posted by cricket (Post 1620954)
Only white men are racist and sexist? What world are you living in?
|
Must be bedtime; I don't even understand the last two posts.
|
Originally Posted by cricket (Post 1620962)
Must be bedtime; I don't even understand the last two posts.
|
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
White dudes suck.
|
Originally Posted by Camo (Post 1620964)
I was saying that some non-whites are racist, and some women are sexist as well but the only people that seem to get personally offended in my experience are white men who are effected by neither. This thread has became more horrible though (somehow) and it was mainly my fault so sorry, haha.
|
Originally Posted by jiraffejustin (Post 1620966)
White dudes suck.
|
Originally Posted by Camo (Post 1620968)
Hey! I'm white!
|
Originally Posted by cricket (Post 1620967)
Ok I got it. It seems to me though, that white men are more likely to get attacked for being politically incorrect, while women and minorities will often get a free pass.
|
Originally Posted by Camo (Post 1620968)
Hey! I'm white!
|
Originally Posted by jiraffejustin (Post 1620970)
Oh... so you are racist then?
|
Originally Posted by Camo (Post 1620973)
Yes.
|
Originally Posted by Camo (Post 1620923)
I agree that the joke this thread was about wasn't offensive at all and people completely overreacted to it but the thread title and subsequent posts are ridiculous; i mean "Ive a feeling she wasnt "politically correct" ;)" as if being 'politically correct' whatever that means is some horrible thing? And all from old white guys who miss the good old days? :sick: This should've been a post in the Chill Club or a Shout with a few responses, the fact that this is a thread with such an insulting title is hilarious. Anyway: Camo/Cosmic 2016 :laugh: |
Originally Posted by TONGO (Post 1620979)
"Old white guys that miss the good old days"? You, Ash, and Iro obviously felt slighted by my thread title.
|
Originally Posted by Camo (Post 1620982)
The majority of your post was about All In The Family not being able to air today which is a show about an old white guy missing the good old days. Was i wrong?
|
|
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
Didn't have to press play; really annoyed i didn't think of that first.
|
Originally Posted by jiraffejustin (Post 1620966)
White dudes suck.
|
Originally Posted by Camo (Post 1620940)
Nah, i'm with you it wasn't offensive at all, i said that already. I was talking about the premise/thread title and following horrible posts equating this incident to the whole idea of political correctness.
I really don't care as much as i'd imagine you think i do; i just think this is a horrible thread. Political correctness has bent to the idiotic, SJW warriors are worthless, period. They just make talk, and wont shut up. The internet is loaded with them. :) |
Originally Posted by Iroquois (Post 1620916)
Allow me to introduce you to an obscure little show called Family Guy.
Originally Posted by Iroquois (Post 1620916)
Yeah, well, look where people who want to go back to the "good" old days have gotten us. Deliberately going backwards doesn't seem like evolution to me.
|
Originally Posted by cricket (Post 1620957)
I think it's just an age thing, at least based on my experiences.
Originally Posted by jiraffejustin (Post 1620958)
Maybe it's because I am a white male, but I am uncomfortable when someone judges someone and assumes they are a certain way because of their race (or gender)
Originally Posted by cricket (Post 1620967)
Ok I got it. It seems to me though, that white men are more likely to get attacked for being politically incorrect, while women and minorities will often get a free pass.
Originally Posted by TONGO (Post 1620979)
"Old white guys that miss the good old days"? You, Ash, and Iro obviously felt slighted by my thread title.
|
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
http://funkycarter.com/wp-content/up...mboday2012.jpg
Oh, and one more thing........... V I C K Y / C R I C K E T 2016 |
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
TONGO / BANNED FROM MOVIE FORUMS 2016
|
Originally Posted by TONGO (Post 1621022)
Hey, if anyone thought Steve Martins post was insulting or degrading in any way about Carrie Fisher, then the thread title applies. If youre offended but agree with the point, then get thick skin. THATs the problem more than if people agree or not, get some thick skin because if you didnt agree with Marttins post then youd probably be one of the complainers.
Political correctness has bent to the idiotic, SJW warriors are worthless, period. They just make talk, and wont shut up. The internet is loaded with them. :) Also, what do you think the W in SJW stands for?
Originally Posted by TONGO (Post 1621026)
Family Guy is a cartoon. All in the Family is more "grounded into reality", I dont know how else to say it to you. Just because theyre both fiction doesnt mean both are impossible, AITF was extremely realistic, and this comparison is weak.
We are de-evolving in the sense where were sensitive for the wrong reasons, and get misled more than what a supposed "age of information" should allow. Just because someone wails theres an injustice done doesnt mean there actually was one. Its like the old west and the ruthless stupid mob now have smartphones.
|
Originally Posted by Iroquois (Post 1621028)
I'd just rather you didn't go down this road. Cant people talk plainly to the masses? Right now, no. The masses would like to believe itself wise beyond its years because theyve the super information highway at their fingertips, but bad judgement isnt something some website can undo. |
Originally Posted by Iroquois (Post 1621041)
Given the context of everything you've posted in this thread (including the fact that it got made in the first place), how am I supposed to take your suggestion to "get thick skin" seriously?
Originally Posted by Iroquois (Post 1621041)
Also, what do you think the W in SJW stands for?
|
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
All this pc crap is getting ridiculous
|
Originally Posted by TONGO (Post 1621042)
No road, it just seemed yall were put off by the point.
Cant people talk plainly to the masses? Right now, no. The masses would like to believe itself wise beyond its years because theyve the super information highway at their fingertips, but bad judgement isnt something some website can undo.
Originally Posted by TONGO (Post 1621043)
Because if we dont get thick skin we start going off on people that dont deserve it. Yes Im complaining about the complainers, but we need to get smarter rather than louder.
The W stands for Wrong. No I'm just kidding, I thought the term was Social Justice Warrior.
|
Originally Posted by Iroquois (Post 1621050)
Well, it is an off-putting point. This was a thing that seemed cut-and-dry - a singular instance of outrage culture overreacting to a decidedly innocuous tweet - and you've turned that into the latest in a long line of debates over PC culture (like we haven't had enough of that from the likes of DAnconia). I might have been willing to agree with your original point, but you've gone and turned it into something bigger than it really needed to be and that's why we're getting stuck into these arguments.
Originally Posted by Iroquois (Post 1621050)
Again, this strikes me as something that cuts both ways, and if you're serious about being smarter rather than louder then something's got to give. I still remember that Halloween costume thread DAnconia started where he quoted articles to further his anti-PC agenda even though those very articles were better at arguing against his point rather than for it - a prime example of louder over smarter. Mindless outrage culture doesn't just come in left-wing SJW form.
Originally Posted by Iroquois (Post 1621050)
Which explains why you wrote "SJW warriors".
|
you seem to really feel bad for this steve martin fella. i have a hunch he's going to be okay.
|
Originally Posted by TONGO (Post 1621064)
First of all, in no way is my point some fluidous babble which was D'anconias thread. Im not talking extremes, but plain common sense in our response to ....well normal life itself. Seriously, Steve Martins tweet even had the possibility to offend people, then the problem is with the people. Not bite into what magazines like New York Magazine or US Weekly consider a slight towards society.
True, but my outrage isnt mindless. Its what too many people consider an outrage which is an outrage. ;)
Nitpicky :rolleyes:
http://static-sailmagazine.s3.amazon...Portlight1.jpg |
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
Have (straight) white males, on average, had a less difficult time than people with another race/gender/sexual orientation throughout modern western history?
Sure. 100% true. Is that a reason to interpret everything they say or do these days as patronizing? No. It's extremely logical that people are angered by the kind of accusations Steve Martin (for instance) has received in this example. That's why I personally think this topic is meaningful. It's a new trend that deserves to be properly discussed and criticized from time to time. Many of you will probably think it's a hackneyed topic (and understandably so), but that's because you've probably never been the victim of it. That last sentence works in both ways. The people who feel offended on one side and the people who are accused of offending on the other side. |
Originally Posted by Frightened Inmate No. 2 (Post 1621068)
you seem to really feel bad for this steve martin fella. i have a hunch he's going to be okay.
|
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
Amazing how if you are white and middle class but agree with PC culture that you are not told your opinion is irrelevant.
I hate being the guy that just continues to point out the hypocrisies in these conversations, but because of those hypocrisies I no longer see any meaningful conversations about these topics. I do agree with Iro that these things should be taken on a case by case basis and not just thrown into a big pot. Maybe the news publications that got on Martin's case about this nonsense should hear that from the SJWs instead of just us irrelevant white males. |
Originally Posted by Iroquois (Post 1620953)
It's a privilege thing, really. The implied reason why white males would want things to go back to the "good old days" is to reclaim the sort of power and status that they feel has been lost because they've had to accommodate people who are different to them (non-white, non-male, etc.).
|
Originally Posted by TONGO (Post 1620979)
"Old white guys that miss the good old days"? You, Ash, and Iro obviously felt slighted by my thread title.
cause it was kinda funny... also, yeah this thread sucks :D |
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
Why does this thread suck? I keep seeing that a lot, but I don't think anyone has explained why it sucks.
|
i was actually gonna put a proper response to this thread, but honestly... this thread topic is kind of a jumbled mess. first it's about Steve Martin having to take down a tweet that SJWs were freakin out about, and then it turned into a 'why can't we just turn back time to when there was a TV show where a racist bigot was the star and it was kind of awful, but, he was extremely lovable and he didn't really mean anything by it, and why do we care so much about those racial slurs anyway?"
i dunno, i just don't think the two topics really have enough in common to be thrown into the same thread. they're very different, and one i actually agree with, but the other i'm like eh... yeah... kinda problematic thinking. i think that's what Iro is taking issue with too, it's like you're saying either we must all agree with both points or else we're "part of the problem", like i guess we're now one of those "rabid SJWs" for it? and, like.... no? |
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
In recent times I've really tried to just ignore all the PC BS because I know that it's just gonna keep on happening and there's nothing I can do about it—but it's just getting worse... and worse... and worse...
Now Steve Martin is merely mourning his dead friend and people are "outraged" by it. Good god. Are these people happy with their lives? Cause I can't see how you can be if you get "offended" by every third word you read or hear. |
I'm pretty sure everyone has misunderstood the "good old days" comment:
Originally Posted by TONGO (Post 1620749)
It was a show about us. People. How we all bitch, do stupid things, have stupid beliefs, and get along with each other regardless.
I don't think TONGO's saying "I wish they would overturn Brown v. Board of Education." I think he's saying people used to be better at disagreeing without being so utterly dismissive towards each other. And given that the response he received to saying this was basically "you're a white male so of course you would think that," it would seem he's got a point. |
Originally Posted by cricket (Post 1620962)
Must be bedtime; I don't even understand the last two posts.
|
Originally Posted by ash_is_the_gal (Post 1621100)
i was actually gonna put a proper response to this thread, but honestly... this thread topic is kind of a jumbled mess. first it's about Steve Martin having to take down a tweet that SJWs were freakin out about, and then it turned into a 'why can't we just turn back time to when there was a TV show where a racist bigot was the star and it was kind of awful, but, he was extremely lovable and he didn't really mean anything by it, and why do we care so much about those racial slurs anyway?"
i dunno, i just don't think the two topics really have enough in common to be thrown into the same thread. they're very different, and one i actually agree with, but the other i'm like eh... yeah... kinda problematic thinking. i think that's what Iro is taking issue with too, it's like you're saying either we must all agree with both points or else we're "part of the problem", like i guess we're now one of those "rabid SJWs" for it? and, like.... no? Heres my opinion, and its an uneducated one ;) I believe we are coming into a generation weened on technology (smartphones & the internet). Informations so available its like a library at our fingertips. The flipside of that coin is sensitivity. Today people know more but can deal with less. The technology is so infatuating we dont have the life experience or thick skin to dealing with problems....or what we perceive as problems. Maybe we will become less sensitive as time passes, and hopefully the next generation will be better than us. |
Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 1621106)
I'm pretty sure everyone has misunderstood the "good old days" comment:
This isn't saying everything that happened in the past is fine: in fact, it's saying the opposite. It's saying it was full of "stupid things" and "stupid beliefs." The "good old" part is the last part: getting along anyway. Not seeing other people's flaws as things that need to be publicly shamed (as if this were the best way to persuade) or buried (as if not having to hear things means they don't exist). I don't think TONGO's saying "I wish they would overturn Brown v. Board of Education." I think he's saying people used to be better at disagreeing without being so utterly dismissive towards each other. And given that the response he received to saying this was basically "you're a white male so of course you would think that," it would seem he's got a point. People today really need to just not freak out over everything that they may not like these days. They need to practice what they preach and "tolerate" opinions that differ from theirs and instead find the stuff we have in common and get along regardless. |
Originally Posted by jiraffejustin (Post 1620966)
White dudes suck.
|
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
I'm pretty sure that's because whiter countries are wealthier. I don't think immigrants are moving to these countries to be near white people, charming company though I am.
|
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
Well then, quality of life might just be determined by how many white folks remain in a given country or neighbourhood. Maybe, it's time to treat this wealth as a resource and not as an enemy. What do you get when the wealthy white folks start leaving a country or neighbourhood?
|
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
It's correlated with whiteness, which isn't the same thing as saying it's "determined" by it.
|
Originally Posted by Movie Max (Post 1621117)
Well then, quality of life might just be determined by how many white folks remain in a given country or neighbourhood.
This is not just exclusive to white people. Like I said in the OP, this is an American thing. You think a European would have been insulted by that tweet? I dont. Compared to the United States theres simply not enough distractions for a European compared to an American. We have so much available to us that we think it means we know more and can deal with more and life simply does not work that way. Kinda like what Robin Williams character said to Will Hunting (Matt Damon) in Good Will Hunting. We might know about alot, but arent experienced in anything. We believe we are though. We have become softer emotionally and know just enough to get us in trouble, in regards to what is and isnt offensive. |
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
Personally, I like the odds a simple correlation offers. For me, there is no need to look for that rare exception to the rule. Looks like PC whining and white shaming are here to punish our wealthy at every opportunity.
|
That's not what that means. Saying something is merely correlated doesn't mean "this is usually true, but there are exceptions." It means that the first thing does not cause the other.
This isn't a PC concept in the slightest: it's a statistical one, and failing to make this distinction leads to all sorts of hilariously nonsensical conclusions. |
Originally Posted by TONGO (Post 1621121)
We might know about alot, but arent experienced in anything. We believe we are though. We have become softer emotionally and know just enough to get us in trouble, in regards to what is and isnt offensive.
Broad generalizations are bad (yes I see the irony in that statement). How can you know what other individuals have experienced, and then decide that whatever it is, it's not the equivalent of something experienced in another country? I would agree with your assessment if you applied it to a relatively small group of loud people (since you said 'we' you can include yourself, but exclude me). |
I'm actually kinda proud of Steve Martin, I think this shows a lot of virtue.
It's possible I'm reading his intentions wrong, but I think he deleted the tweet because it was a proving a distraction from Carrie. I think that says a lot because he'd easily get more people to side with him on this one (other things he's said, not so much, but this one would have been easy). But, he deleted the tweet. It didn't matter that he was right, that most people would think he was right, and that he's mourning a friend; he didn't want to distract from Carrie. I honestly never really thought about Carrie much outside of Star Wars, I'm not going to claim that I was some sort of huge fan. But for some reason it's really bugging me that she's being used as a cudgel in the internet culture wars. Anyway, good on Steve. At least I think so, there might be too much pressure on him to talk about it for him to keep bowing out as gracefully as he's done so far, we'll see. |
Damn, you guys already made all the really good points! I have nothing left to say:p So I have to reiterate:
There's nothing wrong with the title of this thread when taken in the context that it was meant...The magazine and others who complained about Steve Martin's tweet are twits:rolleyes: I do feel sorry for Steve Martin, he's a real person who just had a well known magazine very publicly criticize him for his tweet. I'm sure this very moment he feels frustrated over the situation, I sure would. |
Originally Posted by TONGO
We might know about alot, but arent experienced in anything. We believe we are though. We have become softer emotionally and know just enough to get us in trouble, in regards to what is and isnt offensive.
Originally Posted by Sir Toose (Post 1621127)
I was with you until you started using 'we' as if being an American somehow makes one naive or soft.
Broad generalizations are bad (yes I see the irony in that statement). How can you know what other individuals have experienced, and then decide that whatever it is, it's not the equivalent of something experienced in another country? I would agree with your assessment if you applied it to a relatively small group of loud people (since you said 'we' you can include yourself, but exclude me). |
Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 1621125)
That's not what that means. Saying something is merely correlated doesn't mean "this is usually true, but there are exceptions." It means that the first thing does not cause the other.
This isn't a PC concept in the slightest: it's a statistical one, and failing to make this distinction leads to all sorts of hilariously nonsensical conclusions. |
What I said was short and straightforward, two things that are the polar opposite of "rambling."
But if you want to stick with your "simple correlation," go for it. Just understand that it also leads you to the conclusion that eating more cheese increases your odds of being strangled by your own sheets (not a joke, it's in the link I posted). |
Re: Politically Correct IDIOTS (Steve Martin/Carrie Fisher tweet)
i don't want to be too pc, but movie max is literally making an argument for white supremacy itt.
|
Originally Posted by TONGO (Post 1621121)
Sounding a little bitter there MM, like you hate paying for another races healthcare type bitter. Oh thats right, youre Canadian, I forgot. :rolleyes:
I can't even be mean to you, after the November and December you've had. You have my sympathies. Hope you find better fortunes on the horizon, soon. |
Originally Posted by Sir Toose (Post 1621127)
I was with you until you started using 'we' as if being an American somehow makes one naive or soft.
Broad generalizations are bad (yes I see the irony in that statement). How can you know what other individuals have experienced, and then decide that whatever it is, it's not the equivalent of something experienced in another country? I would agree with your assessment if you applied it to a relatively small group of loud people (since you said 'we' you can include yourself, but exclude me). The "We" is figurative, and not literal. Im trying to be smoother after the 2016 presidential campaign. Its hard when youre outraged or disgusted though, but to be specific Ive always been talking about the Social Justice Warriors. |
Originally Posted by Citizen Rules (Post 1621137)
I can't speak for Tongo, but I bet anything that he used the word we in an attempt not to offend any one group. Call it a kind generalization.
|
regarding the steve martin thing, was the backlash against his tweet even that strong? it seems that many of these things start with a few people overreacting and calling it offensive on twitter and then people who love to complain about "political correctness gone mad" find those tweets and use them as proof, so then pretty soon it gets reported on and everybody knows about it, even though every take at that point is just "i don't see what's so bad about it," and the only people who still care just wanna rant about the SJWs. i think the tweet was obviously well-intentioned but just a bit clumsily-phrased so her intelligence became an afterthought. not a big deal at all, but i'm not convinced many people really cared in the first place. every person i know who is typically sympathetic to social justice causes didn't think it was a big deal. you're judging the social justice movement on its most radical and loony members, which makes every cause look bad.
|
Originally Posted by Frightened Inmate No. 2 (Post 1621143)
i don't want to be too pc, but movie max is literally making an argument for white supremacy itt.
|
Originally Posted by Movie Max (Post 1621145)
I'll be your Buttercup, if you'll be my Prince Humperdinck.:D
I can't even be mean to you, after the November and December you've had. You have my sympathies. Hope you find better fortunes on the horizon, soon. Well come on Max! Youre a Canadian looking-in on the social turmoil which is the U.S., have "we" become a bunch of well intentioned, oversensitive, and easily misled bunch of Ninny's? Yes or No? :) The thread title is raw intentionally. I post to be heard, not to be repped. Though thanks to everyone that did rep the o.p.. It may be my most repped post in like.....ever. |
Originally Posted by Frightened Inmate No. 2 (Post 1621152)
regarding the steve martin thing, was the backlash against his tweet even that strong?
social justice causes didn't think it was a big deal. you're judging the social justice movement on its most radical and loony members, which makes every cause look bad.
|
Originally Posted by Frightened Inmate No. 2 (Post 1621152)
regarding the steve martin thing, was the backlash against his tweet even that strong? it seems that many of these things start with a few people overreacting and calling it offensive on twitter and then people who love to complain about "political correctness gone mad" find those tweets and use them as proof, so then pretty soon it gets reported on and everybody knows about it, even though every take at that point is just "i don't see what's so bad about it," and the only people who still care just wanna rant about the SJWs. i think the tweet was obviously well-intentioned but just a bit clumsily-phrased so her intelligence became an afterthought. not a big deal at all, but i'm not convinced many people really cared in the first place. every person i know who is typically sympathetic to social justice causes didn't think it was a big deal. you're judging the social justice movement on its most radical and loony members, which makes every cause look bad.
|
Originally Posted by Frightened Inmate No. 2 (Post 1621152)
regarding the steve martin thing, was the backlash against his tweet even that strong? it seems that many of these things start with a few people overreacting and calling it offensive on twitter and then people who love to complain about "political correctness gone mad" find those tweets and use them as proof, so then pretty soon it gets reported on and everybody knows about it, even though every take at that point is just "i don't see what's so bad about it," and the only people who still care just wanna rant about the SJWs. i think the tweet was obviously well-intentioned but just a bit clumsily-phrased so her intelligence became an afterthought. not a big deal at all, but i'm not convinced many people really cared in the first place. every person i know who is typically sympathetic to social justice causes didn't think it was a big deal. you're judging the social justice movement on its most radical and loony members, which makes every cause look bad.
Yes its specific groups or types, but theres enough of them to where I say we all got to chill out, and not be so judgemental. Yes Im being judgemental on the judgemental, but what can you do? :shrug: |
All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:07 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright, ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Movie Forums