Jurassic World 3 (Jurassic World: Dominion)
 

https://twitter.com/IGN/status/1176744154220650496
They were so preoccupied with whether they could...

Re: Jurassic World 3
 

Haha, I heard about this on Twitter and made a funny comment asking if Ian Malcolm's black daughter was coming back.

There'll be new kids in this one.


Alan Grant had twins with a Maori woman... one is Indian, the other is Chinese.

Re: Jurassic World 3
 

Seriously though... after last year's Jurassic Park: The Lost World... sorry... The Fallen Lost Kingdom Park World: A Jurassic Park Story... crap, sorry my bad, getting the stories mixed up... after last year's Jurassic Park: Fallen Kingdom... the filmmakers have proved themselves as totally incapable of making a new, decent plot with the Jurassic story.


About time we saw a reboot/remake.
A new Jurassic Park, with a scene for scene translation from the book.
18 rated horror, and the premise will make millions, right there.

Re: Jurassic World 3
 

^An odd thing to say considering how the ending of Fallen Kingdom implies that



so to ditch the promise of a post-apocalyptic dinosaur story to go and do yet another story centred around the island (and a direct reboot of the original to boot) seems just as uninspired. You can't just paper that over with an 18 rating.

Eh. My problem with the Jurassic Park/World sequels was that the controlled breeding was always focused on making big, bad military weapons which just doesn't make any sense. At least in the first Jurassic World, the decision was made for their PARK. But auctions and child cloning and military weapon....no. Just no. I would've had the DNA be smuggled and used to make small, cute, fluffy dinosaurs to sell to people as pets. And then have havoc be caused by the eggs of the cute dinosaurs carry the genes of the original dinosaurs, so they have sharp teeth and stuff. It could be like Gremlins. Boom! Two properties to capitalize on mwahahahaha! :devil:

Re: Jurassic World 3
 

they are too old

Re: Jurassic World 3
 

After handing the reins of Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom to J.A. Bayona, Colin Trevorrow returns for the third installment of the Jurassic World franchise, which revealed its official title today as:

Jurassic World: Dominion.

While plot details are under wraps, it was confirmed that not only Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard are returning, but the original Jurassic Park trio of Jeff Goldblum (who appeared in a cameo as Iam in Fallen Kingdom), Laura Dern, and Sam Neill are returning for the new film as well. Jake Johnson, Omar Sy, BD Wong, Justice Smith, Scott Haze and Mamoudou Athie are also in the film with Johnson, Sy, Wong, and Smith returning from the previous films.

Shooting begins tomorrow.

The film is set for release on June 11, 2021

https://www.thewrap.com/jurassic-wor...lin-trevorrow/

Re: Jurassic World 3
 

Do Minion :laugh:

Re: Jurassic World 3
 

Probably the most uninteresting trilogy to come out in the past decade.

The best bits were lifted from the original trilogy too.


I kinda liked Jurassic World. Gave it a good review in my thread.
They managed to capture something nostalgic and it worked as a standalone movie.
I think the fact it became one of the highest grossing movies of all time meant we had to put up with Jurassic World: The Lost World, sorry, Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom.


Not holding much hope for Jurassic World: Do Minions though. I'm half expecting a kid gets trapped on the island, and Owen and Claire get duped by a bathroom salesman and his ex-wife into rescuing the kid.

Re: Jurassic World 3
 

I could almost respect the fact that the back half of Fallen Kingdom takes place inside a massive Gothic-looking mansion, but that's still not enough in and of itself. The real question is how we're supposed to get from a basement full of dinosaurs to quote-unquote "Jurassic World" even though that's probably the only halfway-interesting place for the franchise to go (as implausible as it seems).

Re: Jurassic World 3
 

Jurassic World was enjoyable. (a few silly things but hey). Then Fallen Kingdom was kinda a let down. I wouldn't say it was terrible but definitely disappointing in a few aspects. Help us JWD your our only hope.

Re: Jurassic World 3
 

No interest what so ever.

Dinosaurs roaming the planet again was the only way this franchise could really go that could be interesting. Despite Fallen Kingdom being a huge letdown I'm still hoping this one can bring something but my expectations are pretty low at this point unfortunately.

*cough*Disney's*cough*StarWars*cough*

Re: Jurassic World 3 (Jurassic World: Dominion)
 

I just figured something out...

The raptor "Blue" and Rexy... are the only ones of their respective species to make it to the mainland.

If Dominion is hinting at a world dominated by dinosaurs, or at least a world where they live in the wild along with the other fauna... how are they gonna breed?

Going back to the original book and movie, there's something about the dinosaurs that was mentioned, and then never mentioned again.
Their frog DNA that allowed them to change sex in a single-sex environment.

So... I reckon there'll be a throwback to that.
Asexual breeding in a single-individual environment.

:D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMjQ3hA9mEA

Convoluted plot twists from Reddit.

Re: Jurassic World 3 (Jurassic World: Dominion)
 

The excited one

I actually liked Fallen Kingdom. I appreciated that J.A. Bayona brought his own unique style.

Re: Jurassic World 3 (Jurassic World: Dominion)
 

This is almost too funny.

The movie has a prologue which will be seeing actual dinosaurs 65-70 million years ago... some of it was leaked online a few days ago.
So basically, the start of the movie, we'll be seeing like a historical flashback to prehistoric times, and seeing the dinosaurs for real kinda thing.

Problem is, the footage has been absolutely shredded by palaeontologists because for some reason, the filmmakers have decided to put dinosaurs fighting other dinosaurs, that are from totally different time-periods, and from different continents.
Giganotosaurus is seen fighting a T-Rex... yet they lived 30 million years apart :laugh:

Oh dear.
Not looking good.

Re: Jurassic World 3 (Jurassic World: Dominion)
 

This whole thing makes me think about the talentless movie makers we have today.
I've mentioned before about how the biz is totally talentless, with remakes and reboots, sequels upon sequels.

But, this news about Jurassic World: Dominion... has cemented my disdain for modern movies and their writers.

The late great Michael Crichton... before he wrote Jurassic Park, he studied palaeontology. He studied prehistory.
He also studied genetic sciences.
Now, the science seen in Jurassic Park is outdated by today's standards. That science is old now, and the theories behind how to obtain dinosaur DNA are now proven as impossible.
However at the time, in the late 80s and earl7 1990s, it was a possible theory and it was studied in depth.
Crichton studied and spoke to experts in these fields. He based his novel's science, on real, genuine, science.
---
Today though, the writers of Dominion... just threw together something they thought would look cool on screen.
No research. No studying. Just make it look cool.
---

It brings up something else I've mentioned before about how talentless and hollow the business is these days, and funnily enough, it's Jurassic Park again.
See... Steve "Spaz" Williams, the man who designed and built the digital T-Rex in the original Jurassic Park movie... would sit and watch his work for hours and hours. He would spend days, weeks, rendering and animating the Rex he built. Then, sit and watch the footage.
Then, he'd sit again, for hours upon hours... watching the footage again, but in reverse.
In his own words "You can spot a lot of mistake watching an animal run backwards"
One man, months of painstaking work to get it perfect.
Today though... 14,000 animators with no talent or patience... render it, animate it, cut it, print it, and get it in cinemas as fast as possible.

I do not disagree with but movie makers want to cover the budget of the movie.
They are focused on the promotion of a film, not on research. and it is working for them.

Yeah but the original Crichton book and the 1993 movie between them conjured up over a billion in profits.

The major problem is they churn out garbage, and make some profits... then churn out worse garbage, and make less profits.
Surely it's better to actually put the work in, and make not only their pockets heavier, but also the fans happy.
If the fans are happy, then the next movie will also do well, especially if that too had talent behind it.

This was alright. Kind of rushed. Cutting from someone running towards some stairs to them hurtling down the stairs. Cutting from Alan Grant running towards some tunnel and then he's in the tunnel. It's odd. It's just doing too much. I'd hoped there'd be enough "full circle" stuff that this would be slower, more deliberate, and better-paced, like the first film was, but there's none of that. It had to decide to keep being like the newer films, to keep being like newer blockbuster action films, or to go back to those slow-burn quasi-horror roots from the 1993 film, and it chose the former.

There are a few good ideas/sequences. The one where Claire's crawling on the ground and into the little puddle (though even that should've been much slower, and twice as long) was genuinely tense. The whole "protected by the metal walkway and sitting between the jaws" thing was excellent. But a lot of the excellence of these ideas is given right back by how rushed they are.

But really, I already said it: these should be closer to horror films than action films, or at least they need sequences throughout that fit that description. That's the best combination. When they're overwhelmingly action films, there's little point in them existing.

Re: Jurassic World 3 (Jurassic World: Dominion)
 

I really wanted to like JW3 but I just found it to be a mess. The OG cast had little to nothing to do and just seemed to wander from one place to the next and magically appear when the plot needed them to. Don't get me started on Claire and that plane. This film definitely felt rushed and under developed which is a shame but its unfortunately what Hollywood churns out these days. Care, time, dedication and attention to detail are sorely lacking in todays films.

Re: Jurassic World 3 (Jurassic World: Dominion)
 

It says a lot that this is the first post in this thread since December (especially since the film actually got released back in June). I thought it was atrocious but even I couldn't muster the energy to dig up this thread and post about it.

Re: Jurassic World 3 (Jurassic World: Dominion)
 

Meh... I didn't hate it, but it was too convoluted for the sake of being convoluted. The whole Malta thing seemed like just an excuse to be "world hopping", while the whole locust subplot, and even the return of the OGs, felt unnecessary. There are some nice setpieces and the character of Kayla was great, but overall, it's a bit of a mess.

Re: Jurassic World 3 (Jurassic World: Dominion)
 

Yeah, the entire Malta thing could just be removed entirely. Which is kinda nuts to think about.

I enjoy the first Jurassic World and the three original films to different degrees…

But the last two were awful. Such a shame.