Originally Posted by PerfectTurdPodcast (Post 2123965)
Not attacking it. We did like the movie. Not sure if you watched the video but rated it 4 out 5.
The b-movie thing is a topic of discussion that crept up because we look at b-movies. Excalibur was recommended to us. We'd never seen it before so didn't know what to expect. There are elements that are cheezy by today's standards and maybe that's why it was recommended to us? But the same could be said for Terminator and other films that are classic. This all goes back to people holding today’s effects against films from 30-40 years ago without consideration for the time period and the limitations of that time. It’s a erroneous way to critique it, as you must consider the passage of time and the era it was released. |
Maybe it's a generational thing. I've always liked the acting in Excalibur, but I've heard lots of younger viewers criticize Nicol Williamson and Nigel Terry, among others, and those are two Shakespearean veterans. I admit that it's a complex film, but it's basically a sci-fi/fantasy/spectacle (sort of an Earthbound-version of Star Wars) with serious issues involving Man vs. Nature, a major John Boorman theme. Plus it's a pretty good horror flick too. It will just never be a b-movie no matter if somebody thinks it's aged.
|
Originally Posted by mark f (Post 2123971)
Maybe it's a generational thing. I've always liked the acting in Excalibur, but I've heard lots of younger viewers criticize Nicol Williamson and Nigel Terry, among others, and those are two Shakespearean veterans. I admit that it's a complex film, but it's basically a sci-fi/fantasy/spectacle (sort of an Earthbound-version of Star Wars) with serious issues involving Man vs. Nature, a major John Boorman theme. Plus it's a pretty good horror flick too. It will just never be a b-movie no matter if somebody thinks it's aged.
Afterward, we discussed what roles he'd be perfect for if he was still alive today. Seems like he would have been a great Alfred in Batman. |
Re: Excalibur (1981)
As I said, I love Excalibur and I actually touched the b-movie aspect in my review for the Fantasy HoF:
Originally Posted by pahaK (Post 2123003)
I think Excalibur is a somewhat unique movie. It's a combination of Hollywood epic, a fantasy b-movie (like Italian barbarian films) and European artsy fantasy (the first example that comes to mind is a Finnish tv-production Rauta-aika aka The Iron Age from '82). It's weird, it's campy, and it's like no other movie I know.
|
Originally Posted by PerfectTurdPodcast (Post 2123965)
.... Excalibur was recommended to us. We'd never seen it before so didn't know what to expect. There are elements that are cheezy by today's standards and maybe that's why it was recommended to us? But the same could be said for Terminator and other films that are classic.
Oh boy, I don't think you know what a b-movie really is and was. In a nut shell a b-movie was made on a shoe string budget with no intentions of being great. Often they were part of a double feature at a drive-in and usually had a shorter run time and were aimed at teenagers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B_movie |
Originally Posted by Citizen Rules (Post 2124035)
Terminator is cheesy??? Say what:p
Oh boy, I don't think you know what a b-movie really is and was. In a nut shell a b-movie was made on a shoe string budget with no intentions of being great. Often they were part of a double feature at a drive-in and usually had a shorter run time and were aimed at teenagers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B_movie I think the issue here is exactly that. The definition. It seems the term is being used here pejoratively for any film with a big budget that seemingly failed. |
Originally Posted by Citizen Rules (Post 2124035)
Terminator is cheesy??? Say what:p
Oh boy, I don't think you know what a b-movie really is and was. In a nut shell a b-movie was made on a shoe string budget with no intentions of being great. Often they were part of a double feature at a drive-in and usually had a shorter run time and were aimed at teenagers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B_movie |
Originally Posted by Wyldesyde19 (Post 2124037)
Yep. I own a whole book That covers the subject.
I think the issue here is exactly that. The definition. It seems the term is being used here pejoratively for any film with a big budget that seemingly failed.
Originally Posted by MovieGal (Post 2124038)
Best B-movie ever, Mad Max (1979), hands down!!!!
|
Originally Posted by Citizen Rules (Post 2124040)
There you go, a b-movie for sure and one that hit really big too.
Always played after midnight at the drive-in cinema when I was younger (in the early 1980s) |
I always preferred The Road Warrior myself but yes, Mad Max is good
|
Originally Posted by Wyldesyde19 (Post 2123967)
Yeah, for what it’s worth I don’t think you’re attacking it either.
This all goes back to people holding today’s effects against films from 30-40 years ago without consideration for the time period and the limitations of that time. It’s a erroneous way to critique it, as you must consider the passage of time and the era it was released. I liked the movie because it veered closer to dark age grit than they usually do, in spite of the grossly anachronistic sets and costumes. I also loved Nicol Williamson's enigmatic Merlin, who is smart and manipulative, and knows how to guide the violent, shallow warlords. It looks a lot like the "serious" version of Monty Python and the Holy Grail to me. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmInkxbvlCs |
Originally Posted by Wyldesyde19 (Post 2124046)
I always preferred The Road Warrior myself but yes, Mad Max is good
|
Originally Posted by Citizen Rules (Post 2124035)
Terminator is cheesy??? Say what:p
Oh boy, I don't think you know what a b-movie really is and was. In a nut shell a b-movie was made on a shoe string budget with no intentions of being great. Often they were part of a double feature at a drive-in and usually had a shorter run time and were aimed at teenagers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B_movie Yes, I know the definition of b-movies, but when we go to people and say "recommend us a movie to review for our b-movie show" a lot of people will recommend movies that you wouldn't consider a b-movie by that definition. They will recommend movies like Battlefield Earth or Waterworld. To a younger generation, the term "b-movie" has expanded to stuff they think looks cheap, campy, lo-fi in any way. Stuff that is classic and was cool when it came out, but looks dated today they'll consider it a b-movie. So since it was recommended to us, we tried to see it from that perspective and raised the question. That is all. |
All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:07 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright, ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Movie Forums