Log in

View Full Version : The Theory of Everything


skizzerflake
12-06-14, 01:53 AM
The Theory of Everything

After a few weeks of All-American fare, this week we travelled to England for our movie fare, as well as our second annual physics movie. The Theory of Everything is a biopic about Stephen Hawking, one of the most astonishing intellects of our or any era. We’ve become familiar with him as the most unusual of media stars, with his severe disabilities and his synthesized voice, but most people are scarcely aware of him before his neurological deterioration set in, when he was young and physically active. The movie begins with Hawking as a young college student, amazing his Oxford professors and putting moves on the girl of his dreams. Before long, however, his physical decline begins, and then the shock of finding out that his problems are fatal, with 2 and a half years to live. His girl friend Jane marries him, despite the diagnosis and undertakes a life where she postpones her academic ambitions (she eventually earned a PhD too) to take care of him and raise 3 children. As we know, he has become a star, eventually divorced from his wife (amicably) and remarried for a while, to a member of his nursing staff.

Initially given a short life expectancy, Hawking continues with his physics career, and outlives all predictions. Those familiar with his theories know that he is credited with theorizing “Hawking Radiation”, in which black holes, instead of being dark, are immensely bright, gradually lose matter to neighboring space and eventually shrink. Somewhat less successful and quite possibly well beyond human intellect is his attempt at a theory of everything, which would resolve the theoretical predictability of large scale physics with the inherent random aspect of the physics of subatomic particles. Not only Hawking but other ambitious physicists are still working on this and it has not happened yet. You might get the impression that if anybody ever DID perfect the Theory of Everything, the universe might end, or time might run backward until we return to the Big Bang.

I really enjoyed this movie. It is just so ENGLISH. Not just British, but English. It has Oxford, Cambridge, bland food and alcohol with every meal, gardens, students wearing academic gowns, polite people living in very old houses, funny looking cars and even a visit with the Queen. I’m not familiar with most of the cast, but Eddie Redmayne is unbelievable as Hawking. How this man managed to spend most of the movie in a body made of skin and bones, twisting himself into an un-doable heap of limpness is beyond me. In some parts of the movie, before his famous speech synthesizer, his speech was so slurred that the movie would have benefitted from subtitles, but he manages to convey a lot, even with the minimal facial expressions that Hawking had at that time. His wife Jane, is played well by Felicity Jones, who brings a lot to the role of a long overburdened woman and wife to a growing media star who can literally do nothing for himself but somehow manages to be the father of 3 kids. The remainder of the cast is unfamiliar to me with the exception of Christian McKay, who was so good as Orson Welles in Me and Orson Welles, in a surprisingly small role here as mathematician Roger Penrose. If you like physics or England or a truly fascinating and truly amazing character, this is quite a good movie. It’s low key, mainly about acting and characters. It’s hard to believe, considering his physical condition, that Hawking is not only alive, but mentally in good shape, 50 years after his death sentence. He’s one of the most amazing characters of our time.

4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUayjO_KgsQ

mrtylerdurden
12-23-14, 06:15 PM
http://www.blackfilm.com/read/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/The-Theory-of-Everything-Poster-2.jpg

The Theory of Everything is about Stephen Hawking and his wife Jane. I was hoping for a biopic about Hawking's life and how he came up with his theories and ideas. In some ways I got what I was hoping for, and in some ways I didn't.

From the trailers, I was expecting the film to be almost completely centered on Stephen Hawking, and for the first hour or so it is. But then as we get about halfway through the movie, the attention shifts from him to his wife. This would normally be fine, but this part of the story isn't necessarily as interesting as the first part. The Jane character is really well developed and complicated, but as strange as it may sound, the Stephen Hawking character is not all that well developed. We witness his struggles and feel for him, and we know that he is smart, but we rarely see him make any large decisions that define him as a character. That's not me saying that Stephen Hawking's character is bad in this movie, that's just me saying that he should have had as much development and decisions as his wife Jane.

I also felt that at times the movie was a bit too dramatic. Not the scenes of Stephen struggling with his disease, those were done very well, but some of the romantic stuff in the movie. For a movie about a real person, and a genius at that, it seemed so much like, well, a movie. I know that may not make much sense, but I just felt that a movie about Stephen Hawking should be as realistic as possible, and not like another Hollywood drama.

The movie also skipped around quite a bit. Skipping entire periods of Hawking's life and without a time reference either. We see a character leave, and then maybe 4 minutes later he's back, and we have no idea how long it's been in real time since the character has left. Has it been months? Years? This made the movie very unrealistic and confusing. It seemed like the filmmakers just wanted to skip past a lot of things to get to what THEY wanted. We might see Hawking say that he wants to write a book and then two minutes later we see the book on sale at the bookstore. How long did it take him to write the book? How much did he struggle in writing the book? Oh well, I guess that's not important. I think I've badmouthed the movie enough, because there were things I liked about the movie.

For one, Eddie Redmayne, who plays Stephen Hawking, gives an outstanding performance. You can see that he really committed to this role and he does an amazing job. I'm sure he will at least get a nomination at the Oscars for this role. Felicity Jones is good in this, but I wasn't really blown away by her performance. She still did a good job in this role though. All of the other acting in the film is fine, but there were no performances that really stood out other than the two I just mentioned.

This movie is well shot, but the cinematography never really stood out to me in this film.

The music was fine in the film and fit the movie well, but it wasn't all that original or memorable.

As a whole, I feel that The Theory of Everything is quite flawed, but I'm not going to say that it's a bad movie, because it isn't. There are some truly powerful scenes in this film, and the leading actors give great performances throughout the film. You can really feel Hawking's pain in the film, and seeing his horrible disease take over his body is heartbreaking. And seeing him overcome this disease to become the renowned genius he is today is uplifting, no matter how you look at it. This is not "one of the best movies I've ever seen" but it has some great moments in it and nonetheless delivers one of the most powerful and inspirational stories known to man to the big screen.

3.5
3.8/5