View Full Version : Superb Scenes With Seanc
MovieMeditation
11-21-15, 06:59 PM
Just caught up with this thread. Great small write-ups and a wide variety of films you have been watching, sean. :up:
Jobs, Beasts of No Nation and Bridge of Spies are all highly anticipated by me and I'm glad to see great reviews for the two first. I have seen mixed to positive reactions to Bridge of Spies, but I have a feeling I'll be one of those who will like it a lot. We'll see. Spectre is Bond and has to be watched, but I'm honestly not in a hurry. I loved Casino Royale, but after that I haven't cared much for Bond. Skyfall was not the great film everyone was talking about in my opinion, but fairly good entertainment. Spectre seems even more bloated and disappointingly diving into the tired old Bond formula, instead of being different like Casino Royale.
Star Wars needs a rewatch, I'm not the biggest fan. Kind of love the sequel though, as many do. Return of the Jedi was a mixed bag for me. The End of the Tour sounds very interesting, I will definitely be checking that out! The Wolfpack caught my attention when I first heard about it, but it lost a little when I heard weird stuff about the making of it. Secret in Their Eyes is an unnecessary I will not see. Nope. Mr. Holmes I want to see for McKellen and the look of it, which you praise, but I expect my reaction to be the same. Spy I disliked a lot as well, but I was a little kinder with the rating. I don't disagree much though and I could very well have been giving it the same. I'm not a fan of Feig at all.
Again, good write-ups and good variation of films. Keep it up, sean!
Thanks for checking in MM. Can you tell me what you heard about the making of Wolfpack?
MovieMeditation
11-21-15, 07:09 PM
Thanks for checking in MM. Can you tell me what you heard about the making of Wolfpack?
I heard it was all fake.
Unfortunately that happens way too often with documentaries (that it isn't genuine), which is a shame, because then you tend to believe it when a doc gets called out for it...
I heard it was all fake.
Unfortunately that happens way too often with documentaries (that it isn't genuine), which is a shame, because then you tend to believe it when a doc gets called out for it...
Wow, I'll have to read up on that. It did feel very weird the documentarians had this access. If they made it up they should have made it better. :D
I heard it was all fake.
Link?
MovieMeditation
11-21-15, 08:34 PM
Link?
I would love to provide it, but I read it a long time ago and have no idea when and where exactly.
But I do remember clearly that it was definitely this film and that it was something about the authenticy of it, especially with a focus on the director and her involvement with the making of the film. But I can't remember details and I wish I could find the article again.
Link?
Everything I have read has been about the authenticity of the timeline. I think there is some questions for sure, but it doesn't seem to be anything even near definitive.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/92/True_Story_poster.jpg/220px-True_Story_poster.jpg
3
Very compelling story and pretty well told. However, this is one of those films that leaves me feeling like there is something missing that I can't quite put my finger on. One thing is that Franco left a lot to be desired for me in this film. Maybe it is because of Hill. The more Hill does serious roles the more I like him and he acted Franco off the screen here. The movie is certainly worth your time and I am glad I saw it.
Who cares if they watched Reservoir Dogs before or after they met the director? It's just a modest doc which seems too strange to believe, but since it's about movies and "overcoming adversity", The Wolfpack won Best Documentary at Sundance. I probably think it's "faker" than most people, but there's nothing I can find to substantiate that.
Who cares if they watched Reservoir Dogs before or after they met the director? It's just a modest doc which seems too strange to believe, but since it's about movies and "overcoming adversity", The Wolfpack won Best Documentary at Sundance. I probably think it's "faker" than most people, but there's nothing I can find to substantiate that.
I'm with you. I liked it but it certainly felt like something was missing. I do have to say one of the articles talked about the scene where the mother calls the grandmother. Apparently that footage was taken by the boys and not the documentarians. Shady stuff like that certainly bothers me.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/24/Creed_poster.jpg/220px-Creed_poster.jpg
2.5
I desperately wanted to love this. It was just too clunky for me to ever fully embrace it. The script is pretty poor and most of the boxing didn't work for me. Coogler is trying to do some things visually in these scenes but it never feels as raw as he wants it too. I really like watching Jordan on the screen but it seems like every movie wants him to pull of being the nicest guy in the room and counter that with him being a thug at the same time. It never works for me , he is always the nicest guy in the room and I am fine with that. I just wish the film makers would be too. Especially here, they could have still created the conflict they needed without pretending he is a delinquent. What this movie gets right is Rocky. Stallone still embodies this character. When you walk away feeling Stallone was by far the best actor in a movie you know that you have put him in a comfortable character. He is at home here, and the scenes between him and Jordan are what work for me in the film, with one exception that I won't ruin. Overall a disappointment for me as I was really anticipating this one.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f3/Spotlight_%28film%29_poster.jpg/220px-Spotlight_%28film%29_poster.jpg
4
As good as advertised. This wasn't one of my most anticipated films but after all the buzz I had to see it. The performances and the script are fantastic. I love the procedural nature of the film. Spotlight really moves forward, never lingering too long. I love how the film makes you feel the effect that this scandal had on a whole community without being too melodramatic. It did get me towards the end though. The last few scenes choked me up quite a bit. One of the best of the year for sure.
cricket
12-05-15, 09:42 PM
You go out to the movies a lot?
You go out to the movies a lot?
Yeah, I probably get to about thirty a year. In fact I double featured today. Next one coming up.
Citizen Rules
12-05-15, 09:45 PM
How did Michael Keaton's performance compare to his in Birdman?
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/96/Trumbo_%282015_film%29_poster.jpg/220px-Trumbo_%282015_film%29_poster.jpg
3
Pretty unbalanced film for me that I ended up falling on the positive side of because of Cranston and Goodman. When the movie allows itself to be nuanced it is very good. Too often it is mustache twirling though, especially through the first half when Trumbo is everything we ever have wanted a human to be. While those against him should have had swastikas on their arms. Glad I saw it but a long way from the film I was hoping for.
How did Michael Keaton's performance compare to his in Birdman?
I didn't like him as well here but he is good. Overshadowed by Slattery, Ruffalo, and Schreiber in my opinion. He is never minimized though, everyone is really solid. Expect a lot of supporting nominations for this movie.
Citizen Rules
12-05-15, 10:10 PM
I never heard of Trumbo, but historical biographies are more thing, so I'll have to add it to my Netflix queue and wait for it to be released. Glad you reviewed it.
Gideon58
12-10-15, 11:08 AM
https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSupk6P0dw1uNZPN0ASKH4fr63Z6vz_S-PTxxWJMIdwxVKWfPaNbA
4
Director: Kathryn Bigelow
Cast: Jessica Chastain, Joel Edgerton, Chris Pratt, Jason Clarke
Let's get the tough stuff out of the way right away. I don't feel that Zero Dark Thirty is "pro torture" on any level. Bigelow presents torture as an element of what transpired in the CIA's search for Bin Laden. Our protagonist never appears to be completely comfortable with the process, and while she does receive a name through this process there is no evidence that she would not have received this information otherwise. I also find irony in the fact that all the controversy surrounds the CIA's interrogation technique and not the invasion of a home where people are shot in the back, and where Bin Laden may or may not be.
While I did not love this movie as much as some have, I did enjoy it a lot and feel overall it is a well above average film. The performances are very good across the board. Clarke and Chastain are the standouts. Again I feel that overall the excellence of Chastain's performance is being overstated, she is none the less giving an above average performance. My problem with the film lies entirely in the pacing of the first half. This is a procedural and we are given lots of important information through the first half, but for me it felt a little slow getting there. I enjoy slow and contemplative, if I am getting a lot of character development in the process. Here however I feel the characters, while not uninteresting, are slightly under developed.
The final third of this film is the highlight for me. Watching Chastain's intensity ramp up as she gets closer and closer to her goal was immensely entertaining. When we are introduced to Seal Team Six the intensity steps up another notch as we know we are getting closer to our goal. There are also some nice lighthearted moments as Chastain's character interacts with the Seals. Finally we get our climactic scene and it is the best action that I have seen in a theater since I can remember. Our final shot is well earned, and the best ending to any movie in 2012. Bigelow once again has more than proven herself in a male dominated genre. I look forward to seeing whatever she may do next.
Loved your review of this film...I haven't seen it, but your review made me want to add it to my watchlist.
rauldc14
12-10-15, 11:10 AM
I don't think Spotlight is even showing around here. Which is disappointing because, McAdams.
Gideon58
12-10-15, 11:13 AM
https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR03RWkzZjT3_6WwISAEZNRYRDaO1u-RNJYNIUi-TFKaUNaremb
0.5
2013 Director: Don Scardino
Full disclosure, I'm a Carell fan-boy, otherwise I wouldn't have gone anywhere near this movie. I should have stayed away. This is the type of comedy that has no appeal to my funny bone whatsoever. This film is trying desperately to be Anchorman but falls flat in every way. The first 20 minutes gives us a glimpse into the two main stars childhood. Presumably to give us some insight into the characters motivation, and to help us connect with them. Strike 1 and strike 2. Why would you spend 20 minutes of a comedy setting up your hero to be sympathetic to the audience if in the very next scene you plan on making him an unsympathetic egomaniac, inexplicable. Every single character in this movie except for Olivia Wilde's is played completely over the top. Correct that. Apparently they were told to play the character over the top, and then crank it up another notch.
Of course all of this is forgiveable in a comedy if it does the one thing that everyone expects, make us laugh. As you can probably already tell Wonderstone fails here as well. Two jokes landed for me in an hour and a half. When the name of Carrey's characters television show is revealed and the scene after the credits start rolling. Except for those not even a chuckle. It's the same way as I feel about The Office post Carell (in case your wondering why I'm a fan-boy).
I, too am a big Steve Carell fan but haven't heard anything good about this film and your review seems to back up everything I've heard thus far...I'm still going to try and see it at some point.
Gideon58
12-10-15, 11:14 AM
I enjoy reading your reviews! Your pretty good at it. I am a little disappointed to see Broken City got such a low rating. Not because I have seen it, but because I want to. I will still watch it of course, I just don't expect as much as I did. Also I loved City of God I thought it was amazing!
I'm really enjoying your reviews too...love the way you write.
Gideon58
12-10-15, 11:15 AM
https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTnEuECPxyCtK-Av2Np8nvwerYELwq6K-9QKF1XQHcKB4jLVpbN
4
2009 Director: Duncan Jones
Sam (Rockwell) works for the company that is responsible for producing most of the world's energy. Sounds like a great gig but there is a catch. He work on the moon, what's worse is he is stationed there for the duration of a three year contract with no interaction except for GERTY (Spacey) the computer that aids him in his work. Sam knows three years is too long, he desperately misses his wife and daughter. He has begun to have delusions, he tells GERTY he is worried because he has begun talking to himself. Things turn real bad when he takes a trip on a rover to fix a piece of machinery that has broken down. Sam crashes the rover and it is at this point that things start to become fuzzy not only for Sam but for the viewer.
Everything Moon is it owes to Rockwell. He is always a more than capable actor but outdoes himself in this role. The character he is playing goes through many extreme emotional states during the course of this film. Rockwell not only displays these emotions effectively but he keeps what could be an extreme character grounded enough that we continue to identify with him throughout the entire film. Spacey has a unique voice, one that doesn't always work to his advantage. It works perfectly here, the emoticons on GERTY are quite effective as well. Non-human characters are not an easy thing to pull off in film, but GERTY not only works it adds to the emotion of the film. If Moon has an issue it is in visuals. This was probably a low budget movie so I won't harp on it. I will say that everything inside the station is fine, everything outside the station less than fine.
Moon is a very effective character study. Grounded sci-fi is rare and Moon is better than most that have tried. Even the twists feel less jarring than they do in most movies. A must watch for any film fan.
Loved your review of this film and can't wait to see it, HUGE Sam Rockwell fan.
Gideon58
12-10-15, 11:30 AM
https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRGi8-b_wlwlREntflknQlu2gGRDbHo_g13IKoRWRfI65E6HHtt
4.5
Director: Billy Wilder
Double Indemnity is a skillfully written, engaging film-noir. The film follows insurance salesman Walter Neff who falls for a clients wife when meeting her for the first time. They soon develop a scheme to write an accidental death policy on the husband and stage his murder as an accident. All appears to be going smoothly until the claims manager, Barton Keyes, grows suspicious.
Keyes is played by Edward G. Robinson who in my estimation takes this film from another ho-hum noir to a completely engrossing film. Keyes and Neff's scenes together are by far the best thing in Double Indemnity, leaps and bounds ahead of Neff's scenes with Stanwyck's femme fatale. MacMurray is also doing good work as Neff. He particularly excels in the scenes where he is feeling the pressure of his scheme unraveling. The weak link in my opinion is Stanwyck. She feels like someone who is sleep walking through their role, never allowing us to feel the emotion of her character.
Double Indemnity has made me excited to see more of Wilder's work. It is a very straight forward story elevated by Wilder's touches. His dialogue is brilliant. The twists are smart but well thought out. Allowing us to enjoy the story arc as it fleshes out rather than simply trying to fool us as so many thrillers do. The visual touches in the film bring a coolness as well. I was particularly fond of the way Neff lights his matches with his fingertips. Not only was this a cool touch, but Wilder uses it to convey character's emotions visually rather than verbally on a couple of occasions. Double Indemnity is a true classic.
I love Double Indemnity too, but I totally disagree regarding Barbara Stanwyck...I think it's her best performance and that she was robbed of the Best Actress Oscar that year.
Gideon58
12-10-15, 11:36 AM
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTuyiuFlOgOu_TKooP9gQK5JshXUvf23JvUDC_VsUeFZg9r2faCsg
4.5
Director: Jeff Nichols
Mud is the story of two best friends who happen upon a boat on an island that somehow became stuck in a tree. They plan to attempt to get the boat down and make it their own but discover that someone else already has the same plan. That someone is Mud (McConaughey) who tells the boys he is holding up on the island until he meets his girlfriend. Ellis, our protagonist, is immediately intrigued by Mud's personality and his situation and begins to do favors for him. Every favor leads to another favor and soon Ellis is learning more about Mud and his life than he should. He is also becoming more and more entwined in whatever conflicts Mud is involved in. Ellis's best friend Neckbone is leery of helping Mud from the beginning but is more than willing to support his friend in his decisions.
Ellis (Tye Sheridan) is the heart of this film and carries nearly every scene. Ellis is a complex character. He loves without reservation, he fearlessly confronts any perceived wrongs, and he is 100% committed to those in his life that he connects with. He sees something in Mud that he wants for himself and though Mud is flawed he commits to his cause as if it was his own. Ellis learns many life lessons over the course of the film. We can begin to see his faith in humanity shaken. That the film does not end with us having a concrete feeling of how this character will endue is a testament to Nichols script.
Some may read Mud as a cautionary tale for Ellis. I found him to be a picture of unconditional love. Mud is certainly flawed and would probably find his lot in life improved by cutting certain ties. Ultimately though his life would be hollow without the passion and love he has developed.
Nichols has created a nearly perfect film. There are a couple of characters and one five minute scene that in my opinion keep this from being a perfect film. Other than that the film is flawless. As in Take Shelter Nichols creates an amazing sense of place. We are gladly immersed in the world of the characters. The characters are rich and ambiguous. We feel like we know even the secondary characters who are given limited time. Shannon is particularly memorable as Neckbone's uncle. No scene is wasted, Nichols gives us emotion and context every step of the way. I can't wait to experience Mud again.
Another film I have never even heard of, but your review made me want to see it.
I'm really enjoying your reviews too...love the way you write.
Thanks Gideon. I have slowed way down with full reviews because I just felt myself getting too repetitive. I do enjoy doing a few a year though. Thanks for reading through.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/e5/The_Man_from_U.N.C.L.E._poster.jpg/220px-The_Man_from_U.N.C.L.E._poster.jpg
2
Big dumb fun. Just a little too much emphasis on the dumb for my taste. Not terrible, looks good and has a distinct style. I am just never going to think about it again. I was not a big fan of Cavill either, that didn't help matters.
edarsenal
12-13-15, 02:18 PM
Seen a variety of reviews regarding this movie and being a Guy Ritchie fan I'll still be checking it out at some point and the "big dumb fun" has been consistent and simply reminds me to turn the brain off while viewing.
Thanks sean
Seen several reviews for Mr. Holmes and have it on request at my library -- can't wait to see that one
http://i.imgur.com/cl3TTII.jpg
5
There was no way that I was going to come out of this movie with an unbiased opinion. When you well up at the text crawl the director has to do little more then tell a proper story to make you love their film. That is not hyperbole or a way to overstate my fandom. I literally welled up at the text crawl and at a couple of other moments in The Force Awakens. It should be said from the start that if anyone complains that this movie has too much fan service it is impossible to argue with them. The main reason that it is going to be nearly impossible for fans of this world to come away unsatisfied is fan service. The thing is after waiting twenty years for a sequel to the greatest trilogy ever created, fan service can not only carry a film it was really needed. The way that I reacted to this film emotionally and the way that my crowd reacted audibly are proof that fans were not ready to say goodbye to the characters and world that Lucas created.
Maybe a lot of directors could have taken over this franchise. There has certainly been enough talk about everything the prequels got wrong in comparison to the beloved originals. Abrams deserves credit however, because he listened to that talk and delivered the goods from a visual stand point in The Force Awakens. I am not always the best eye when it comes to CGI versus practical effects. It is easy for even me to see that this film feels stripped down when compared to the flashy sterile feel of the prequels. Abrams knows there is nothing wrong with a little dirt and grime in this universe. We are supposed to be thrust into a galaxy at war. Where the uniforms are worn by combatants and the vehicles have been used. Abrams understands this and rightly traded in the glossy showroom look of Episode I-III for the lived in world of IV-VI. The other noticeable difference is the script. Don't get me wrong this isn't Tarantino dialogue. It is more than serviceable though, especially when compared to the clunky eye-rolling scripts of the prequels. It is not perfect. There are a couple of scenes that would have been on the cutting room floor if I had my way. However, I was constantly engaged with both the old characters and the new. There is plenty of humor and I think it all lands. Again, Abrams really understands what the fans responded to the first time around and gives us more of what we have been craving.
I really think the new characters are well done and will propel this franchise forward. There is a lot to talk about when it comes to the new characters but I am very content to let that talk happen over the next couple of months. This movie definitely needs to be experienced spoiler free especially for fans of the franchise and I would not do anything to put that in jeopardy for anyone who may be reading this. Abrams has done a great job of instilling the characteristics into his new characters that made the old ones so great while also keeping certain information at arms length so we are completely invested in the story as it unfolds both here and in future chapters to come.
The hype is real folks. I have not sat with a crowd that was so into a film since seeing The Avengers. I have not been this excited to make a return visit to the theater for a movie since, well, maybe never. I am certain to go see this at least one more time and probably two. I have never seen my children so engaged on an initial viewing of a film. During the final scene my oldest was repeating a phrase to me over and over again in anticipation of the inevitable. I want to talk about this film with fans who have seen it. So get out and go watch this thing. Star Wars is back and aims to please.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/6/6b/Queen_of_Earth_Poster.jpg/220px-Queen_of_Earth_Poster.jpg
3
This is my second Alex Ross Perry film. He is a director I feel like I should love but so far I am having a lukewarm response to his movies. His dialogue is right up my alley, very sharp and biting. He gets great performances from his actors. Moss's here is probably my favorite female performance of the year at this point. His films have a very pleasing aesthetic, especially here. I love the lake setting and the look of the house. I also like his muted color palette which is very similar here and in Listen Up Phillip. Speaking of aesthetics. I absolutely love the look of the title cards and credits here. It is a small thing, but they are quite unique and really stood out to me. However, something continues to keep me from falling in love with these films. Despite the dialogue being so good the interactions are pretty unrealistic. Everyone says exactly what they are feeling at all times. The responses of others to these interactions are problematic for me as well. Maybe these are the things that are keeping me from totally embracing Alex Ross Perry. It could be the opaque nature of his narratives as well. I like the themes but it is tough to totally grasp everything that is transpiring and that is not always a good thing for me. I am certainly leaning to the positive side with his films but can't help wanting more.
I've seen three of his flms. The two you saw i give 2. In fact, I just finished this one an hour ago. Moss' scene where she cussed out her friend's lover was the best in the movie. His cinematographer and editor are getting better with each movie - I especially liked the slow dissolves and transitions here. The music was like something from a psychological horror film, and in a way it was, but he's still too cutesy in what he's trying to accomplish. He's trying to delineate depression and schizophrenia and show that it can go hand in hand with artistry (the beautiful drawing) but even at 90 minutes, it still feels too underdeveloped.
I've seen three of his flms. The two you saw i give 2. In fact, I just finished this one an hour ago. Moss' scene where she cussed out her friend's lover was the best in the movie. His cinematographer and editor are getting better with each movie - I especially liked the slow dissolves and transitions here. The music was like something from a psychological horror film, and in a way it was, but he's still too cutesy in what he's trying to accomplish. He's trying to delineate depression and schizophrenia and show that it can go hand in hand with artistry (the beautiful drawing) but even at 90 minutes, it still feels too underdeveloped.
I like that scene as well but my favorite was the opening. I really thought I was going to love the movie after that scene. I almost wished they hadn't showed the boyfriend at all in that scene. In fact the more I think about it the more I wish there were no men at all. I don't think I liked any of the stuff with the men. I forgot to mention the score, I don't know if you are saying you liked it, but I did.
No men? Almost like Perry's version of Persona?
No men? Almost like Perry's version of Persona?
I heard it compared to that a couple of times but I wasn't even thinking about that actually. I really didn't like the men though. Especially the neighbor. A couple of those scenes really grated on me. The canoe scene was the worst. I did like the dinner scene, but really I liked her speech which ended up not being about him at all.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/d/d3/Joyfilmposter.jpg/220px-Joyfilmposter.jpg
3
Definitely in the second half of Russell's filmography for me but not nearly as bad as everyone is saying. The writing, music. humor, and performances are all there. Something feels uneven about it though. It has moments where I thought it was going to propel itself into the Russell movies I love but never quite makes that step.
cricket
12-27-15, 09:40 PM
Trailers don't always mean a lot, but Joy's did nothing to make me want to see it.
rauldc14
12-27-15, 09:42 PM
Disappointed that he would make a film like Joy to begin with. I don't plan on seeing it for awhile.
Cole416
12-27-15, 09:46 PM
Not a fan of David O Russell outside of The Fighter so ill pass.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/d/d4/The_Hateful_Eight.jpg/220px-The_Hateful_Eight.jpg
4.5
Oh my! Tarantino is always divisive but this one is really going to split the crowd up I think. It really feels like this is everything Tarantino does dialed up, which is saying something for a guy who is never subtle. The first two hours of the film is just spending time with his dialogue and getting to know the characters. Setting you up to knock you down. Exposition in its most glorious form. This movie was a perfect five for me through the first two hours. Tarantino even uses score in this film and it sounds great. He throws in a couple of great songs as well. Through the last 45 minutes we get violent, blood thirsty, shock them silent Tarantino. Admittedly he loses me a bit here but there is still enough great to keep me in the story. Endings of films usually weigh very heavy for me but Tarantino has enough goodwill with me both as a storyteller and in this film to only knock off a tick on the rating. Tarantino fans are going to love this, sit back and enjoy.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/e5/Tangerine_%28film%29_POSTER.jpg/220px-Tangerine_%28film%29_POSTER.jpg
1
I have heard so much good buzz on this film. I thought we were supposed to be breaking down stereotypes in 2015. Not funny at all and certainly not emotionally engaging. Easily one of my least favorites of the year.
rating_1
I thought we were supposed to be breaking down stereotypes in 2015. Not funny at all and certainly not emotionally engaging. Easily one of my least favorites of the year.
What was it about? What stereotypes?
honeykid
01-02-16, 10:59 AM
I'd like to hear some of your thoughts about it, too. :)
It is about two transgender prostitutes in LA. The whole premise is that one has just got out of prison and found out that her pimp cheated on her while she was away. All the humor comes from the fact that this is a sassy black transgender. We are never laughing at jokes we are laughing at the absurdity of this human being. She is a tornado rolling through all these establishments she knows and asserting her will. I won't say I didn't snicker a few times but it is easy laughs. There is nothing imaginative here. We also have the taxi driver who has a family at home but a transgender prostitute fetish. His big laughs come when a new prostitute doesn't have a penis. Get it? Because she is working the wrong block. It's funny cause he likes dudes that want to be girls.
I won't talk about the end in case someone wants to watch but we meet the pimp who isn't breaking down barriers let me tell you. The taxi driver also gets himself in another "hilarious" situation. The whole thing is just a big mess for me.
Citizen Rules
01-02-16, 12:40 PM
Sounds like my kind of film....NOT.
I'm glad you elaborated on Tangerines as it will spare me from ever watching that.
Daniel M
01-02-16, 01:01 PM
Glad you loved The Hateful Eight Sean :)
cricket
01-02-16, 07:44 PM
Glad you enjoyed The Hateful Eight; I know how much you were looking forward to it.
I liked Tangerine quite a bit but wouldn't disagree with much you said :laugh:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/fa/Mistress_America.jpg/220px-Mistress_America.jpg
4
Every Baumbach movie I see I rate a bit higher than the last. Makes me think I need to go back to Frances Ha. I love his writing and characters. His characters are incredibly self aware but at the same time unable to change their weaknesses, instead just charging through them and hoping others aren't noticing. Even in the areas they are successful they never feel that way and are always looking for something different. They are mostly bad at relationships. The more I see of Baumbach and the more I watch his movies, he feels like this generations Woody Allen. Really great at writing white upper middle class characters in an intelligent and funny way. Really liked this film.
Just found out the other day that Baumbach co-wrote Fantastic Mr Fox; my favourite Wes film and second favourite Animation. The Squid and the Whale is the only other thing i've seen from him which i liked well enough, Jeff Daniels was really great.
Just found out the other day that Baumbach co-wrote Fantastic Mr Fox; my favourite Wes film and second favourite Animation. The Squid and the Whale is the only other thing i've seen from him which i liked well enough, Jeff Daniels was really great.
I always forget The Squid And The Whale is him. I swear I have seen that but judging from the year I don't think I have. I am going to prioritize that and Greenberg.
I always forget The Squid And The Whale is him. I swear I have seen that but judging from the year I don't think I have. I am going to prioritize that and Greenberg.
One of my friends says Greenberg is the worst film he's ever seen, pretty sure his favourite film is Man of Steel or something though so i don't take him seriously on films.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/7a/Infinitely_Polar_Bear_poster.jpg/220px-Infinitely_Polar_Bear_poster.jpg
2.5
Despite all the criticisms warning me away I just love Ruffalo too much to stay away. He is definitely what held it all together for me but I didn't think it was as bad as everyone has said. It may not be a super realistic look at bi-polar disorder but it is a funny and charming character flick. Not great but worth watching.
Citizen Rules
01-05-16, 09:28 PM
That one is on my watch list and towards the top, so one of these days I'll get to it. Glad you at least liked it to some degree.
I'm watching it now - half hour to go.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/b/b6/The_Revenant_2015_film_poster.jpg/220px-The_Revenant_2015_film_poster.jpg
5
This movie blew me away. I was prepared to like this quite a bit. Inarritu is a director I really respond to and Birdman was my second favorite film from last year. I wasn't prepared for how much I loved this though. The cinematography might be the best I have ever experienced. By now everyone has probably heard the stories about how they would only film a certain amount of time each day because of Inarritu's desire to use natural light. I was ill prepared for how magnificent this movie would look because of that decision. The beauty of the landscapes juxtaposed with the harshness of the reality of it for the characters really drive this movie and make it a hell of a theater experience. The way they use fire and water adds a texture to the frames. Inarritu also uses his sweeping camera movements to create a sense of how vast the space is. I am not the greatest at spotting long shots when I am watching a film but the way the camera moves leads me to believe there are quite a few here. I love the camera work. I really can't say enough about it. I know some find Inarritu to be a bit of a show off with the camera but as long as he keeps me glued to the screen I am more than okay with it, in fact I love it.
The camera work isn't the only thing great about this film. The story is very compelling and more than enough to engage for over two hours. It is simple but complex from a character standpoint. Hardy's character ends up being the villain of the story but the truth is he is in a very tight spot when the conflict begins. We are supposed to hate him, and I do, but his motivations at the start are not unsympathetic. Of course DiCaprio is the hero and he is really good. He is doing alot without dialogue, which is unusual for him. It is not my favorite performance of his, but I won't be disappointed if it is the one that finally gets him an Oscar either. I am not the first person to say this, I read it a couple times after my viewing, but I thought of Malick in a handful of scenes in the film. This was a nice reprieve because the last thing to talk about is how brutal this film is. I don't remember having this visceral of a reaction to a theater viewing since Braveheart. There is just something about steel and spears that my body responds too much more than gunshots. Of course there is also the bear attack. It is every bit as intense as advertised. I cringed but never looked away. So brutal yet cinematic at the same time. It is definitely something that will stick with me and may be the scene of the year.
As usual when I like a film this much I don't really feel like I am doing it justice. I am just listing all the things I like. In really hope film fans will experience this in the cinema. In my opinion this is the film that deserved a roadshow. My favorite of the year and one that will be an all time favorite for sure.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/e3/The_Big_Short_teaser_poster.jpg/220px-The_Big_Short_teaser_poster.jpg
3
A very entertaining way to tell a white collar crime story. Poor man's Wolf Of Wall Street, probably but that doesn't make it bad. I wanted it to be funnier and I wanted to like the characters more but what I got was entertaining enough and well done.
cricket
01-09-16, 04:58 PM
That's the most glowing review of The Revenant I have seen on the forum. I almost watched it a couple weeks back, but my wife said she wants to see it so it'll be when on DVD.
honeykid
01-09-16, 05:21 PM
I wanted it to be funnier and I wanted to like the characters more but what I got was entertaining enough and well done.
Why did you want it to be funnier? Looks like the kind of film I'd be disappoint to see as a comedy. Much like Men In Black. I was gutted when I discovered that wasn't a serious film.
Why did you want it to be funnier? Looks like the kind of film I'd be disappoint to see as a comedy. Much like Men In Black. I was gutted when I discovered that wasn't a serious film.
The trailer had a Hustle or Wolf vibe. I love that kind of stuff. Plus Carell, who I think is great. It had its moments of humor. Just didn't wow me. The editing wasn't great for me either.
Man, now I want to see "The Revenant" because it sounds like I will like it, going by your review.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/7c/Irrational_Man_%28film%29_poster.jpg/220px-Irrational_Man_%28film%29_poster.jpg
3
Pretty entertaining. Well written of course, and I love the jazz scores Allen chooses. The score and crime element made this feel a bit like a Leonard adaptation. Much different types of characters than that though. I quite enjoyed it, made me want to watch Match Point again.
Miss Vicky
01-15-16, 11:22 PM
Shame you didn't like it more than that. Funny Face and I had a lot of fun watching that one.
Shame you didn't like it more than that. Funny Face and I had a lot of fun watching that one.
Really picked up the second half. The table setting didn't thrill me as I wasn't in love with the Stone character. Pretty solid though.
55 2015 releases seen, which seems to be about where I end up the last few years. Still a few movies on the agenda, including two best pic noms, but I will have to get to them after the awards. So this is where we land as the year comes to a close. Overall a pretty good year with only a handful of duds and a handful of standouts.
McFarland USA 2.5
Focus 2
Chappie 2
Serena 1.5
Monkey Kingdom 2
Ex-Machina 3.5
Avengers 2 4
Mad Max: Fury Road 3
Jurassic World 2
Inside Out 4.5
Love & Mercy 4
Me And Earl And The Dying Girl 3
While We're Young 3
Minions 1
Jupiter Ascending 1
Ant-Man 3
What We Do In The Shadows 3
Clouds Of Sils Maria 2
Mission Impossible-Rouge Nation 3
Trainwreck 2
Ricki And The Flash 2.5
Aloha 2
Slow West 3
The Water Diviner 2
Black Or White 2
Black Mass 3.5
Everest 3
The Walk 3.5
Sicario 3.5
The Martian 4.5
Steve Jobs 4
Beasts Of No Nation 3.5
Bridge Of Spies 3
Spectre 3.5
The End Of Tour 4
The Wolfpack 3
The Secret In Their Eyes 2.5
Best Of Enemies 3.5
Mr. Holmes 3
Spy 1
True Story 3
Creed 2.5
Spotlight 4
Trumbo 3
The Man From U.N.C.L.E. 2
The Force Awakens 5
Queen Of Earth 3
Joy 3
The Hateful Eight 4.5
Tangerine 1
Mistress America 4
Infinitely Polar Bear 2.5
The Revenant 5
The Big Short 3
Irrational Man 3
Best Of 2015
Pretty good year in film. As usual many of my choices come from the end but there were a couple of movies I really loved from the start of the year this year. No notable omissions. I will say Avengers was hanging on to the top ten for quite a while and just missed out.
Best Scene:
A handful of standout scenes this year but not as many as usual I don't think. The dinner scene in Inside Out almost made the cut. I love the pool scene in Love & Mercy. In the end I couldn't look past the most talked about scene of the year. It was just too impressive from a visual standpoint.
http://i.imgur.com/pRMn0Ps.gif
Thanks to mark for the gif. The Revenant is one of the most visually impressive movies I have ever seen and this scene is the crown jewel.
Best Female Performance:
Elizabeth Moss-Queen Of Earth
http://i.imgur.com/HTxZyn6.jpg
Not a film I loved but I did the love the performance. Emotional, ambiguous, and the best of the year.
Best Male Performance:
Paul Dano-Love & Mercy
http://i.imgur.com/7hz7LdQ.jpg
In a year full of great and fun performances an actor I don't usually care for was the cream of the crop. This performance and film have stayed with me all year long. I love it.
Top 10 Films 2015:
10: Mistress America
http://i.imgur.com/skouvrP.jpg
9: The End Of The Tour
http://i.imgur.com/QP1nVzs.jpg
8: Steve Jobs
http://i.imgur.com/pf7S5Ki.jpg
7: Spotlight
http://i.imgur.com/xHhkg2v.jpg
6: Love & Mercy
http://i.imgur.com/LwFBCIL.jpg
5: The Martian
http://i.imgur.com/a5FeU1n.jpg
4: The Hateful 8
http://i.imgur.com/mnn9QYu.jpg
3: Inside Out
http://i.imgur.com/ZKcuAa9.jpg
2: Star Wars: The Force Awakens
http://i.imgur.com/NO4aq1S.jpg
1: The Revenant
http://i.imgur.com/SdO4YVv.jpg
In a year when my favorite franchise ever had an honest to goodness revival my last theater viewing of the year left the biggest impression. Visually probably the most striking movie I have ever seen. However, it is also has a strong narrative and is quite the visceral experience. I absolutely loved it.
http://i.imgur.com/tQdDEvz.jpg
honeykid
01-16-16, 09:13 PM
If you liked/loved A Man For All Seasons, may I prod you towards the fantastic Wolf Hall.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_Hall_(miniseries)
If you liked/loved A Man For All Seasons, may I prod you towards the fantastic Wolf Hall.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_Hall_(miniseries)
👍👍 added to the netflix que. Thanks HK, looks up my alley.
Thursday Next
01-17-16, 01:30 PM
I found having read and watched Wolf Hall made it harder to believe in Thomas More as a hero in A Man For All Seasons, since he's more of a shady character in Wolf Hall.
Great job Sean for spending another year full of quality reviews and an abundance of films. :)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/e6/Kung_Fu_Panda_3_poster.jpg/220px-Kung_Fu_Panda_3_poster.jpg
1
Thought my first 2016 release was going to be a Coen brothers flick but the midgets wanted some Po in their life. These movies are fun visually but there is really nothing going on for the adults. That's okay, the kids eat it up.
What are your thoughts on the first two KFP films? I found them to be entertaining enough.
What are your thoughts on the first two KFP films? I found them to be entertaining enough.
About the same from what I remember. No humor in it for me which hurts I think.
Optimus
02-01-16, 11:04 AM
I enjoyed the first Kung Fu Panda, but the second kinda sucked.
MovieMeditation
02-01-16, 11:37 AM
I enjoyed the first Kung Fu Panda, but the second kinda sucked.
I need to rewatch the second one, but I remember hating it. The first was fun though.
The Gunslinger45
02-01-16, 02:21 PM
I remember I thought the first Kung Fu Panda was good. Never bothered to watch the sequel though.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/0/01/Hail%2C_Caesar%21_Teaser_poster.jpg/220px-Hail%2C_Caesar%21_Teaser_poster.jpg
3
I think the most disappointing thing for me in this Coen brothers film is that I wanted more of every single character and every single story thread. That has to be a good thing, right? As a series of vignettes I might have loved this film. There are many memorable moments and I had a smile on my face the entire time. The problem is I wanted more of it all and I never got comfortable enough in any of the characters or threads to become totally immersed or to glean any true comedy from it all.
There are so many great actors in this movie and they all do a great job. Brolin's character is the only one we spend a significant amount of time with. He is great as the head of the studio but he is just the conduit to the characters that I want to spend more time with. Clooney, Johannson, Fiennes, and even Hill all have really good scenes but we don't get much of any of them. Just enough to wet the appetite.
For that reason I think this is probably a movie that I will enjoy even more on further viewings. It is good, if you love the Coen brothers it is a must. If their quirk annoys you then you are better off staying away.
Daniel M
02-05-16, 10:05 PM
Your review makes me even more interested. How similar is it to The Big Lebowski would you say?
I thought the guy who played Hobie Doyle was the best in the film. He was my favorite character.
Your review makes me even more interested. How similar is it to The Big Lebowski would you say?
I think Lebowski is much funnier and more sharply written. It is similar in that the plot is irrelevant. It probably reminded me of O'Brother the most. This doesn't have anything nearly as iconic as The Dude I don't think.
I thought the guy who played Hobie Doyle was the best in the film. He was my favorite character.
He was very good. His scene with Fiennes or the group of religious leaders talking about the movie were my favorite scenes in the film.
Another thing I love about the film, and Coens in general, is how they always subvert your expectations.
Another thing I love about the film, and Coens in general, is how they always subvert your expectations.
How did you feel about the submarine scene?
That's exactly what I thought about when I said that.
That's exactly what I thought about when I said that.
Ha, that must have been subconscious. I really didn't notice that. I really wanted to know. One of the only scenes I didn't like at all.
Really? I can kind of understand why, but I liked it.
I love how the briefcase just falls into the water. It makes what we think is this really important object completely meaningless, story-wise.
Really? I can kind of understand why, but I liked it.
I love how the briefcase just falls into the water. It makes what we think is this really important object completely meaningless, story-wise.
Don't know how I missed you responding before. You're right about that though. Tatum was good too. Like most of the characters, I wanted more.
Good review, but I might just skip this one, even though it's a Coen bros movie. Disappointed that they went back to their been-there-done-that story; especially after they gave us No Country and Lweyn Davis
Iroquois
02-16-16, 05:25 AM
It's funny cause he likes dudes that want to be girls.
Dude, how are you going to criticise Tangerine for perpetuating stereotypes and then go ahead and write something like this?
Daniel M
02-16-16, 06:01 AM
Dude, how are you going to criticise Tangerine for perpetuating stereotypes and then go ahead and write something like this?
He's saying that he didn't like the film because he felt they were playing out the stereotypes and we were meant to be laughing because of this, that's not what he thinks is funny. You should read his post again.
Iroquois
02-16-16, 06:28 AM
He's saying that he didn't like the film because he felt they were playing out the stereotypes and we were meant to be laughing because of this, that's not what he thinks is funny. You should read his post again.
I understand that. My point is that, if he does take such issue with the film's treatment of its characters as stereotypes, he could have expressed it without making a reductive statement where he refers to trans women as "dudes who want to be girls". It's that kind of discourse that undermines his more salient criticisms about the film, even if he is trying to play the line off like a joke.
Daniel M
02-16-16, 06:33 AM
I understand that. My point is that, if he does take such issue with the film's treatment of its characters as stereotypes, he could have expressed it without making a reductive statement where he refers to trans women as "dudes who want to be girls". It's that kind of discourse that undermines his more salient criticisms about the film, even if he is trying to play the line off like a joke.
I don't think so. I think he's merely pointing out the kind of joke that the film is wanting to make, saying that they are reducing the characters to this kind of humour despite attempting to me something more. He's pointing out the ultimately the humour comes down to stereotypes and these things that people will laugh at, he's criticising the film for wanting people to think like that. I think you're talking about a non-issue here.
Iroquois
02-16-16, 06:57 AM
I don't think so. I think he's merely pointing out the kind of joke that the film is wanting to make, saying that they are reducing the characters to this kind of humour despite attempting to me something more. He's pointing out the ultimately the humour comes down to stereotypes and these things that people will laugh at, he's criticising the film for wanting people to think like that. I think you're talking about a non-issue here.
I guess this has something to do with the fact that I wasn't aware that Tangerine was supposed to be a straightforward comedy. The scene in question works because it subverts the extremely tiresome "cisgender person sees transgender person's genitals and freaks out" cliché. In the context of the film, we don't know what the deal is with the taxi driver and his connection to the greater plot yet, so when he picks up a woman in an area that the audience knows is full of trans sex workers, viewers are at least half-expecting for the cliché to play out normally. As a result, it's practically a relief when it gets flipped upside-down by making the taxi driver disappointed by the fact that the woman doesn't have a penis. Of course the humour in this case comes down to stereotypes, but at least it doesn't play them out annoyingly straight.
Also, none of this addresses my problem with his choice of words (which was my original point).
Don't think Sean had any bad intent, he was mocking what the filmmakers seemed to be acting like.
Dude, how are you going to criticise Tangerine for perpetuating stereotypes and then go ahead and write something like this?
Yeah, sorry I missed this. My tounge was firmly in cheek. I didn't find it funny but I feel this is why the movie puts it there and thinks it's funny.
Tangerine is interesting because to me it is playing to all kinds of sterotypes, and laughing at them. Yet everyone is treating it as this ground breaking all inclusive film. Baffling to me.
https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTf4SOh8tIKws7oTH0YDTGmJvgt7p4NDuz-wqisuQK5dTDiO1uW
rating_4_5
Director: Jean-Pierre Jeunet
Amelie is born to parents who while caring and intelligent never show her the affection children crave, and shelter her from fear that she has a heart condition. Naturally as soon as Amelie is old enough she wants to venture out into the real world. She feels like an outcast but soon realizes that the people in her life feel like outcasts for one reason or another and she sets out to do the things for them they will not do for themselves to make them happy. Unless you are heartless it will be impossible for you not to find Amelie endearing, and most of us can probably relate to her insecurities in one way or another. As Amelie works through her insecurities and tries to do something to make herself happy, as well as those around her, our fondness for her grows and grows.
The title character is not the only thing that Jeunet does well in Amelie. The supporting characters are well thought out and blend perfectly in Amelie's world. This film is also beautifully shot. There are many breathtaking frames in Amelie. His use of color is also impeccable and adds much to the visual tone of this movie. The casting of Tautou can also not be overstated. She is perfect in this role, I can't imagine another actress playing her as well.
The themes in Amelie are not unique and are presented in a straight forward way. But rarely have I seen them done so well, with such an endearing character, and with the style of this film. Amelie is an endearing feel good film that I will enjoy coming back to again.
Hi, Sean. :) Here I am back to your thread the 2nd time around. hope you don't mind. I loved Amelie, too. It was funny, original, I love Audrey and my fave scene is the one on Monmartre. but, like in so many movies, it's romance that stands out for me. I never got to Paris, but this is maybe the best film if you wanna see it. Le Professionnel is in my heart, but this is partialy a tourist film and a documentary.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-uxeZaM-VM
Hi, Sean. :) Here I am back to your thread the 2nd time around. hope you don't mind. I loved Amelie, too. It was funny, original, I love Audrey and my fave scene is the one on Monmartre. but, like in so many movies, it's romance that stands out for me. I never got to Paris, but this is maybe the best film if you wanna see it. Le Professionnel is in my heart, but this is partialy a tourist film and a documentary.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-uxeZaM-VM
Glad you're reading back through my reviews Beatle. Amelie was great, I need to get to it again.
Glad you're reading back through my reviews Beatle. Amelie was great, I need to get to it again.
Hey man, thanks. Have you seen I finaly congratulated Mark's and your birthday? Sorry if i went overboard with astrology, it seemed like a fun idea. I understand, some folks don't like it. I just thought it would be fun. :)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/46/Deadpool_poster.jpg/220px-Deadpool_poster.jpg
1
I caved and went. I sure wish I hadn't. Everything I thought this movie would be it was. All the humor was lost on me except for one Zamboni joke. Maybe it was because of the marketing or the word of mouth, but all of the swearing and sex felt forced. There was nothing natural or fun about any of it for me. The action was really bad in my opinion. I am not one to spot bad CGI in films, but all the action scenes here looked really poor to me. Except for a couple of cool uses of song this movie was simply not for me.
Citizen Rules
02-26-16, 10:52 PM
A 1 Rating for Deadpool, I'm not surprised. It's not anything I'm interested in, especially after reading "but all of the swearing and sex felt forced". It seems today's mass-marketed, block buster movies all feel the need to go 'bigger and badder' each time. When a movie has to use shock scenes over and over to entertain, Hollywood has lost it's way. But we already knew that.
Iroquois
02-27-16, 04:00 AM
A 1 Rating for Deadpool, I'm not surprised. It's not anything I'm interested in, especially after reading "but all of the swearing and sex felt forced". It seems today's mass-marketed, block buster movies all feel the need to go 'bigger and badder' each time. When a movie has to use shock scenes over and over to entertain, Hollywood has lost it's way. But we already knew that.
Do they? The bulk of mass-marketed blockbusters all try to carry a PG-13 rating or lower so as to avoid alienating significant portions of the movie-going public, so if they are going "bigger and badder" every time then they're being very careful about it. In this regard, Deadpool is an anomaly and not the natural progression of any trend towards being "bigger and badder". It's got a relatively small budget compared to your average superhero movie ($58 million, as opposed to $200 million for the PG-13-rated X-Men: Days of Future Past - badder, but definitely not bigger), so the fact that it proved to be such an instantly colossal record-breaking hit was seriously unprecedented. Unfortunately, this means that it's liable to be imitated to hell and back by profit-minded producers who will try to replicate its more "mature" elements (last I heard, they're planning on making the next Wolverine film R-rated so the trend is already starting to take hold) but with potentially worse results than Deadpool itself.
For the record, I did not think Deadpool was very good in the first place so I'm glad to see I'm not the only one around here who sees through its nonsense.
Citizen Rules
02-27-16, 02:29 PM
It seems like most newer Hollywood movies I've seen are constructed with a PG rating storyline, but they then throw in a few f bombs to earn a PG-13 rating so that their profits go up. PG-13 films seem to make more money than PG films (at least I heard that once), unless the PG film of course is aimed at small children.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/77/The_Look_of_Silence_%282014_film%29.jpg/220px-The_Look_of_Silence_%282014_film%29.jpg
5
I watched The Act Of Killing a couple of years ago along with the rest of the cinephile world. Although I respected it a great deal and could appreciate Oppenheimer's work, it did not grab me on the emotional level that it seemed to so many others. That could be my fault, and I will return to it someday, but in the mean time The Look Of Silence did grab me on that level in every way. It has only been a few hours since I watched it but I think I already consider it the most harrowing film I have ever seen. I think the difference of significance for me is the point of view of the film. This time the point of view is entirely from the brother, Adi, of one of the victims. We sit with Adi as he watches the footage that Oppenheimer has shot of the men who killed his brother. As in the first film they are doing some recreation and seem oblivious to the impact of the genocide they have committed.
Not only do we see Adi watching this footage but we get to go on a journey with him. A journey that very few victims get the opportunity to go on. He gets the opportunity to confront many of the perpetrators of the horrible genocide that took place, and specifically men and family members who were directly responsible for his brother's death. It has to be pointed out that much of the emotional punch in this film comes from the fact that Adi appears to be one of the most humble and forgiving men you will ever see. He never shows anger although we can see the hurt all over his face. He does ask pointed questions when the perpetrators waffle, which they always do, down to a person. It is infinitely frustrating to see these men brag about ridding their country of communism only to then deny culpability once they find out who Adi is.
This isn't just unique to the perpetrators either. The family members also stick up for these men. Sometimes making excuses for them and sometimes outright denying they even knew about the killings. We also see some of them turn on Oppenheimer, which is quite a shift from The Act Of Killing. All along the journey Adi seems to simply want answers that he will never receive. One of the most heart wrenching moments is when he finds out his uncle was a guard for the men that were captured, including Adi's brother. He brings this information to his mother, who had no idea.
Adi's parents are also a significant part of the film. His father is 104 but thinks he is 16. He is unable to care for himself and is being taken care of mostly by Adi's mother. She is quick witted and brings some joy to the screen. When she learns what Adi is doing, she fears for his life. Afraid that if those in power know his intentions that he will meet the same fate as his brother. All these scenes cut me deeply. Each one bringing a weight and emotional impact I was not prepared for.
I won't say I love this film because I think that is doing the impact it has an injustice. I think this is an amazing feat in documentary film making. Oppenheimer's vision was incredible and I am pleased he has brought this story to us in this form. It makes me very excited to see what he has in store next
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/9c/Triple_9_poster.jpg/220px-Triple_9_poster.jpg
3
I have heard a lot of bad about this movie on podcasts. I thought there was plenty more good than bad. I am kind of a sucker for a crime flick, so that is to be expected I guess. The complaints came about the character motivations and plot. I didn't find either of those things to be lacking or unclear. In fact I was really invested through the whole film. I thought the plot was engaging and the characters good. The action is really well done. There are a couple of sequences that are amazing in my opinion. My problems come in the third act, which they tend to do in thrillers for me. It cops out in many ways. When movies do what this movie does in the third act I always feel like they don't have an intelligent way to write a good ending and that frustrates me. Overall, I certainly recommend this to fans of crime films.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/ea/Zootopia.jpg/220px-Zootopia.jpg
2.5
Took my boys to see this on Saturday. Not top tier Disney but it is cute and funny at times. Good voice performances and excellent animation.
Glad you liked "Triple 9", because I liked it a lot. I wasn't bored at all what makes it better than many well acclaimed flicks already.
I think that's the first opinion on Zootopia I've seen that is even approaching negative. The response seems to have been massively positive. I'm really looking forward to seeing it, thought the trailers looked great
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/46/Deadpool_poster.jpg/220px-Deadpool_poster.jpg
rating_1
I caved and went. I sure wish I hadn't. Everything I thought this movie would be it was. All the humor was lost on me except for one Zamboni joke. Maybe it was because of the marketing or the word of mouth, but all of the swearing and sex felt forced. There was nothing natural or fun about any of it for me. The action was really bad in my opinion. I am not one to spot bad CGI in films, but all the action scenes here looked really poor to me. Except for a couple of cool uses of song this movie was simply not for me.
I havent seen the movie, but know of the character in comics. Even in his comic book hes like that, too much. The true funniest superhero of them all is Spider-Man.
http://i.imgur.com/nmmfqlg.jpg
5
My third Jarmusch, and he is becoming a director who's style I respond very positively too. That said, I have a hard time thinking I will love any of his films more than I loved this one. I had never even heard of Dead Man, or Jarmusch for that matter, until arriving on Mofo. This western has everything I look for in a film. It is a simple story littered with interesting characters. The protagonist is on a life changing journey, and that journey has spiritual elements. There is also a large amount of humor, which for me adds so much to the characters and feel of the film.
I say this story is simple, and the narrative itself is very simple. There is however a large amount to be mined from this film thematically. I am not going to even begin to tell you I understand everything that Jarmusch is trying to get across here. I have been thinking about the tobacco thing for over 24 hours now and I am no closer to understanding what in the world it is a metaphor for. I still love that aspect of the film though. Tobacco becomes a running gag and even though I never get the meaning behind it I still enjoy it.
I also don't know exactly what Jarmusch is trying to say about violence in Dead Man. He uses violence here exactly the way I like to see it used. Sparingly, but in jarring and graphic bursts. Blake Leaves a large amount of dead bodies in his wake on his journey. Like I said earlier he is on an obviously spiritual journey, to say it is a journey towards enlightenment would not be a stretch at all. For this reason I kept expecting the violence to eventually end, but if anything it ends up getting worse the farther along the journey he goes. I am not exactly sure what this means to the film thematically, but again I thing it is interesting to chew on and the not understanding never frustrates me the way it does in other films.
I have talked about the spiritual journey of Blake a couple of times. This is the most engaging aspect of the film. His relationship with Nobody is so great to watch. I love these kind of cryptic relationships where the wise man is teaching the protagonist life lessons and he doesn’t even realize it. Nobody is a great character and I was very pleased when he returned after leaving for a moment. The shot of Blake finding him again is also one of the best in the film. I won't say, so as not to ruin it, but I found the mind and eye tricks Jarmusch was playing there very fascinating.
Nobody isn't the only great secondary character in the film. In fact I can't think of a single character that I didn't enjoy. They are all acted very well, are interesting, and many of them are very funny. They all add something fascinating to Blake's journey and I love every single one. Depp as Blake is perfect. This is my favorite performance of his ever, and he is an actor that I have liked pretty well at times in his career.
I probably shouldn't talk about Dead Man without mentioning the score and cinematography. The electric guitar score is awesome. It is never over done and fits the tone of the film perfectly. I guess I should say it shapes the tone of the film perfectly. I also really liked the black and white cinematography. The movie looks amazing and there are some really incredible shots. The stroll through the white trees and the train at the beginning being the most memorable. There is a shot in this film that I hated. It is a quick shot but it sticks out like a sore thumb in a film I otherwise found perfect. It is when Blake falls out of the hotel window. We get a quick wide shot of the night sky and it couldn't look more artificial. It is similar to the helicopter shot in Rear Window. It is quick and doesn't mean much but I won't forget it and wish I could. Other than that I can't speak highly enough about the look of the film.
I am delighted to have a new favorite film to talk about and think about. I expected to like this movie but wasn't prepared for just how much I would love it.
Great review Sean even if I personally kind of hated Dead Man.
Citizen Rules
03-13-16, 11:04 PM
Awesome review Sean, I read it twice. I loved Dean Man and it was one of the first films I reviewed here, albeit mine was a very short review. You cover all the bases and I agree whole heartily with everything you said. I can't image this film without the character Nobody or the actor who played him, that goes for Depp too. I'm a Jim Jarmusch fan and I'm glad to see another convert:p
Great review Sean, I'm always glad when someone finds a new favorite. For some reason, it makes me happy. I haven't see it yet, but I look forward to it.
christine
03-14-16, 10:11 AM
I love Dead Man too. Nice reading your review Sean. It's ages since I watched it and feel the need to again now :)
I'd not heard of The Look of Silence. I'd probably watch that one day. Thanks for the review Sean.
Gideon58
03-14-16, 04:41 PM
https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR03RWkzZjT3_6WwISAEZNRYRDaO1u-RNJYNIUi-TFKaUNaremb
0.5
2013 Director: Don Scardino
Full disclosure, I'm a Carell fan-boy, otherwise I wouldn't have gone anywhere near this movie. I should have stayed away. This is the type of comedy that has no appeal to my funny bone whatsoever. This film is trying desperately to be Anchorman but falls flat in every way. The first 20 minutes gives us a glimpse into the two main stars childhood. Presumably to give us some insight into the characters motivation, and to help us connect with them. Strike 1 and strike 2. Why would you spend 20 minutes of a comedy setting up your hero to be sympathetic to the audience if in the very next scene you plan on making him an unsympathetic egomaniac, inexplicable. Every single character in this movie except for Olivia Wilde's is played completely over the top. Correct that. Apparently they were told to play the character over the top, and then crank it up another notch.
Of course all of this is forgiveable in a comedy if it does the one thing that everyone expects, make us laugh. As you can probably already tell Wonderstone fails here as well. Two jokes landed for me in an hour and a half. When the name of Carrey's characters television show is revealed and the scene after the credits start rolling. Except for those not even a chuckle. It's the same way as I feel about The Office post Carell (in case your wondering why I'm a fan-boy).
I really don't see the correlation between this film and Anchorman.
Daniel M
03-16-16, 11:37 PM
Dead Man is a masterpiece, I'm really glad that you enjoyed it so much Sean, really a great film. It baffles me that people find it boring or whatever, I don't get why it's so polarising.
rauldc14
03-16-16, 11:45 PM
I thought it was boring the first time. I'll be watching it again for the Western HOF
Iroquois
03-17-16, 12:46 AM
Dead Man is a masterpiece, I'm really glad that you enjoyed it so much Sean, really a great film. It baffles me that people find it boring or whatever, I don't get why it's so polarising.
It doesn't baffle me in the slightest. Dead Man is a masterpiece and all, but I wouldn't be surprised that its slow and off-kilter approach to the Western narrative would alienate viewers. Even though it's one of Jarmusch's most accessible films, he's most definitely not for everyone.
honeykid
03-17-16, 11:50 AM
It's a western. I can instantly see why people wouldn't like it.
It's a Movie I can instantly see why people wouldn't like it.
Quoted for Honeykid's truth.
Daniel M
03-17-16, 03:11 PM
It doesn't baffle me in the slightest. Dead Man is a masterpiece and all, but I wouldn't be surprised that its slow and off-kilter approach to the Western narrative would alienate viewers. Even though it's one of Jarmusch's most accessible films, he's most definitely not for everyone.
That's the thing though. I'm aware that some people find films to be slow, dull, and that I don't. But I don't think Dead Man fits into this category of being this, or dreary, or dull. To be it seemed fast moving, full of energy and fun.
Citizen Rules
03-17-16, 03:29 PM
Dead Man's problem is it's black & white. That probably cost it millions in lost box office dollars.
BTW, I love that it's shot in B&W and it's been a favorite of mine since I've first seen it. Then again I've liked the Jarmusch films I've seen.
http://i.imgur.com/DZlJ8nj.jpg
3.5
It is feeling like I am going to be the only person who talks about movies on the internet to like this film. I am quite surprised that this is the case because when I think about the film and what I usually respond to, on paper it seems like it would not be for me. It is a plot heavy, dour film. Character development is not of the utmost importance here. Snyder seems to have an expectation that we already know and understand these characters. It actually seems like an approach that comic book fans have been wanting with their complaints about origin stories but it doesn't seem like it worked for those fans here. We do get the Batman story again, but it is told in what amounts to a cold open. I think it worked wonderfully.
One of the complaints about the film I have read in two or three places is that the motivations of our heroes is thin at best. I feel Snyder handled this very well, and deftly at that. He took by far the biggest complaint about Man Of Steel, the collateral damage, and added it to the beginning of this film so seamlessly that if I wasn't aware of the complaints I would believe that this was the plan all along. We see Bruce Wayne rushing to get to one of his buildings that is part of the damage happening during Man Of Steel's finale. I love the imagery here, of Wayne looking up and seeing the destruction being caused by the fight between Superman and Zod. Which leads me to what I probably like the most about this film and that is the imagery that Snyder uses throughout. In fact I am so impressed by the visuals here that if it wasn't for my couple of gripes this could have well been among the few comic book films that I truly love. Not only does Snyder use the iconic imagery well but the action is all first rate as well. Batman has his normal array of gadgets but, like the origin story aspect, we don't get what feels like reveals of any of his equipment or vehicles. He simply uses them as if they were always there. Although I like the Superman action as well, I feel Batman gets the more memorable scenes. They may be telegraphed, but nothing about comic action gets me more amped than watching Batman come through a wall to surprise an unsuspecting attacker.
As far as the plot goes I was also a big fan of the political aspect of the film. It is simple enough, how would the country react, and what would be the ramifications, if a man who seemingly has the power of a God was suddenly among us? What limitations should we ask him to be beholden to? Would people worship him or think of him as a threat? BVS sets out to answer these questions, and I think does a great job of laying the ground work for them. I think the narrative fits the characters perfectly and it feels like we are headed to a satisfying conclusion because of how well Snyder handles the setup. Unfortunately my biggest problem with the film comes when a turning point completely abandons this plot thread. The moment is not what I am opposed to, in fact I think it is rather good. What I didn't like is that it propels us into a rather ordinary third act instead of the answers I was hoping for. I am holding out hope that Snyder is saving this for future films, time will tell. It certainly brought my rating and enjoyment down a notch here however.
I have also seen several comments around the web that we really don't get enough of Superman vs Batman. The actual fight is short and we basically only get one. Once again, I really enjoyed what we do get. Going into the film I was very interested to see how they would let Batman meet Superman on his level at all. Snyder does a great job here. Superman's weakness is shown early on and the way Batman is able to get access is completely plausible in the reality of the film. This makes the fight itself very memorable and Snyder's direction makes it engaging. I will say the most memorable part of their showdowns for me comes before the actual fight and it involves the Batmobile and Superman's thigh. Pretty good stuff.
In addition to the visuals this film is really good in other technical aspects. I have heard the score mentioned other places and it is indeed great. I took notice of it several times throughout the film and I would definitely say it is my favorite among comic book films. The acting is also very good across the board. I include Eisenberg in this. Most don't seem to be enjoying his Lex Luthor, I thought he was really good. Over the top, yes, but not anymore than other comic villains, and certainly not to an annoying degree for me. I think this character gets just the right amount of screen time and is the proper vehicle to getting our two heroes together at the end. Wonder Woman has also been a point of contention among critics. I certainly wasn't blown away by this character on any level but her presence didn't bother me either. She basically becomes apart of the background of the film until the final act. With the length of the film and the amount of threads being juggled, I feel like this was the perfect place for her at this point. She also gets a pretty cool moment with her lasso. Snyder did just enough here that I will now be willing to check out a stand alone film, something I wouldn't have said previously. I also enjoyed the secondary characters. Alfred and Perry, played by Irons and Fishburne, are very good in the screen time they get. They provide much of the very little comic relief. I don't think the script here is going to be wining any awards, but considering how plot heavy the film is, it is more than sufficent. If it wasn't I don't think the performances would be as solid as they are.
So my major gripe with the film is simply the third act. Third act problems are not new to my viewing experience of any genre however. I think there are many very well conceived films that simply fall apart because the vision lacked a natural ending point. My hope is that Snyder has a strong sense of where he is going moving forward. I think he has laid a very nice foundation despite what almost everyone but me is feeling right now. After Man Of Steel I have a sense he was in a nearly impossible situation. Even in this culture I don't think I have ever seen such backlash for a film before it was even released. I think the fact that DC is setting itself up to compete with Marvel has people wanting it to fail before it has hardly begun. I hope that the competition continues to push both parties to continue to be as creative as possible with characters who are already engrained in our culture.
By no means am I the biggest comic book fan around. I have no nostalgic attachment to the characters. I am not a big blockbuster lover, they are rarely among my favorite ten films of the year. I do however enjoy the experience of an event movie in the theater. I think our technology now has made the tent pole popcorn film more enjoyable than it has ever been. Despite critics feeling otherwise, I don't feel any type of film is creating those experiences better than comic book flicks. That has become especially true now that my children are beginning to get into theses films. DC has a ways to go to catch Marvel who has a huge head start on them and much more backing from the crowds that go see these types of films. I think BVS is a very good start in trying to catch them. My hope is that the crowds that go see this will be more in step with my line of thinking that the internet critics and bloggers that mostly be seeming to really want to take this movie down.
http://i.imgur.com/kYdsnvJ.jpg
Wow Sean. I'm pretty sure that's the most positive reaction so far on here and I certainly wouldn't have expected it to come from you.
I have heard the score mentioned other places and it is indeed great.
Really? Anytime I had seen Zimmer's score singled out it was for great criticism. I'd seen numerous people complaining about how intrusive and overbearing it was.
Wow Sean. I'm pretty sure that's the most positive reaction so far on here and I certainly wouldn't have expected it to come from you.
Really? Anytime I had seen Zimmer's score singled out it was for great criticism. I'd seen numerous people complaining about how intrusive and overbearing it was.
Goes to show you depends on who you read. I think I probably read half a dozen reviews since seeing it. The score was mentioned twice positively. The others not at all. I loved it.
Excellent Dead Man review Sean :up:. Like Citizen said you really covered everything. I loved it too, still haven't watched anything else from Jarmusch yet though, I did see a cameo of his in the show Bored To Death which was hilarious though, i seriously hope this is how he is in real life :D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Al0NhSWtQck
Not been bothered about Batman vs Superman since i heard it was being made. I will probably end up watching it once and enjoying it more than most though since i wasn't expecting much from it. Same reason i didn't hate Man of Steel like most.
Am i missing something with your review in Sean's review thread? haha.
People will start posting reviews in Mark F's Movie Tab next :coleman:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/a4/The_Jungle_Book_%282016%29.jpg/220px-The_Jungle_Book_%282016%29.jpg
2.5
Had to go see this after hearing so many good things. I thought it was fine but far from what everyone was describing it as. There are some fun moments but overall it just didn't have the joy and humor of the original for me. It's a kids flick, and that doesn't have to be a derogatory thing.
Gideon58
05-11-16, 11:24 AM
https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR03RWkzZjT3_6WwISAEZNRYRDaO1u-RNJYNIUi-TFKaUNaremb
0.5
2013 Director: Don Scardino
Full disclosure, I'm a Carell fan-boy, otherwise I wouldn't have gone anywhere near this movie. I should have stayed away. This is the type of comedy that has no appeal to my funny bone whatsoever. This film is trying desperately to be Anchorman but falls flat in every way. The first 20 minutes gives us a glimpse into the two main stars childhood. Presumably to give us some insight into the characters motivation, and to help us connect with them. Strike 1 and strike 2. Why would you spend 20 minutes of a comedy setting up your hero to be sympathetic to the audience if in the very next scene you plan on making him an unsympathetic egomaniac, inexplicable. Every single character in this movie except for Olivia Wilde's is played completely over the top. Correct that. Apparently they were told to play the character over the top, and then crank it up another notch.
Of course all of this is forgiveable in a comedy if it does the one thing that everyone expects, make us laugh. As you can probably already tell Wonderstone fails here as well. Two jokes landed for me in an hour and a half. When the name of Carrey's characters television show is revealed and the scene after the credits start rolling. Except for those not even a chuckle. It's the same way as I feel about The Office post Carell (in case your wondering why I'm a fan-boy).
Wow, you're certainly entitled to your opinion, but you were pretty harsh on this film...being a Carell fanboy as you put it, you couldn't look past a lot of the issues you had with the film? I agree the film has its problems, but I did find it watchable and haven't enjoyed Jim Carrey onscreen so much in years.
Gideon58
05-11-16, 11:26 AM
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTvo762t53lNWuU59O9BHok8O6BFD9wmWZ-m6QE1HbFHH-61lo5
3.5
2012 Director: Craig Zobel
This sounds really interesting, adding it to my watchlist.
Gideon58
05-11-16, 11:35 AM
I liked Bernie. Jack Black does a good job with his tragicomic role, and he and Shirley Maclaine make for a compelling combination.
I also really enjoyed Jack Black's other Linklater film, School of Rock.
My favorite Linklater film, though, is without question Waking Life.
Love School of Rock...for my money, Jack Black's finest hour.
Gideon58
05-26-16, 07:20 PM
The acting is bad, soap opera bad. Some may possibly give Franco or Williams a pass because of the material. However no one will give Kunis a pass when she is transformed into the wicked witch of the west. If you need a reminder of how an over the top stereotypical witch should be played go back and watch a few minutes of Margaret Hamilton's version.
I liked this movie a lot more than you did, but I will agree with you one thing...Mila Kunis...really had a hard time swallowing her as the Wicked Witch...loved Rachel Weicz though.
This sounds really interesting, adding it to my watchlist.
you should,its a movie,for me atleast,thats stays with you for a few days after though...
Gideon58
05-26-16, 07:48 PM
I know that Carell is a much bigger star than he was when the original was released. Brick is not a character that should be getting a lot of screen time though. The character is simply too stupid and doesn't work. Teaming him with Wiig and making that character just as dumb does not help. I can't remember laughing at any of the time spent with these characters at all.
I pretty much said the exact same thing in my review of this film...Brick became too retarded in this film and his scenes with Wiig were a waste of time.
Gideon58
05-26-16, 08:04 PM
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1f/WallStreet2013poster.jpg/220px-WallStreet2013poster.jpg
4
Director: Martin Scorsese
Cast: Leonardo DiCaprio, Jonah Hill, Margot Robbie
Scorsese has created the film with the most debauchery in it that I have ever liked and possibly even love. A solid seventy percent of this film is nothing but men living in filth. It becomes too much and is overwhelming but if that is not the point than I don't know what the point is. It is certainly the feeling I came away with and the reason I think this movie is really good. That does not mean however that it is not relentless. Which has had me contemplating two issues. How re-watchable is this film? Where would I trim the fat? The first question matters to nobody but me. The second is more important in my opinion because there were moments in this movie when I was irritated and a couple when I was rolling my eyes. My most irritating scene involves Quaaludes and a Lamborghini. I have heard many pointing to this as one of the highlights,. I will give DiCaprio credit for the physicality of the scene. Beyond that though I found the scene immensely irritating mostly because it felt so implausible. My biggest eye roll involved the main players and discussion surrounding midgets. These were not the only two instances in the film but for me were the most egregious and took me out of the film the most.
On to the good of which there is an immense amount. Everyone in this movie is great, even the unknowns of which there are a few. DiCaprio shines brighter than the rest though. Maybe because he is given the helm but quite possibly because he is one of the best actors working today. He is non stop energy and mouth as the Wolf, and that is fun to watch. There are a slew of scenes that are standouts but one in particular would be my choice for the best scene I have watched in any movie this year. It involves Kyle Chandler, DiCaprio, and a yacht. At first you are not one hundred percent sure where the scene is going or how it will play out for the characters. It is masterfully constructed and as the tension in the scene builds I felt myself both shifting and smiling at the same time. Fantastic stuff and there are plenty more of that. McConaughey is great in the couple of scenes we get to spend with him. Hill also stands out as the best friend and business partner.
The Wolf Of Wall Street is very memorable film about the dangers of excess and the "American Dream". In fact it is a very good movie about those things but falls just short of being great. In fact I feel I watched a superior movie about those things by David O'Russell just a couple of weeks ago. Many have been comparing American Hustle to a Scorsese film. In my opinion O'Russell out-scorsesed Scorsese this year, even if it was just by a little bit.
You liked this film a lot more than I did, but I sure enjoyed reading your review.
vBulletin® v3.8.0, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.