LuDiNaToR
12-28-10, 09:04 AM
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_tbrP2N-dr8s/TFgxd4OrMfI/AAAAAAAAADs/5pakK5dLtJ8/s1600/Little+Fockers+Movie+Poster.jpg
It has taken 10 years, two little Fockers with wife Pam (Polo) and countless hurdles for Greg to finally get "in" with his tightly wound father-in-law, Jack. After the cash-strapped dad takes a job moonlighting for a drug company, however, Jack's suspicions about his favorite male nurse come roaring back. When Greg and Pam's entire clan-including Pam's lovelorn ex, Kevin (Owen Wilson)-descends for the twins' birthday party, Greg must prove to the skeptical Jack that he's fully capable as the man of the house. But with all the misunderstandings, spying and covert missions, will Greg pass Jack's final test and become the family's next patriarch...or will the circle of trust be broken for good? (imdb)
Well Little Fockers sets up the trilogy with these movies now, we had Meet The Parents, Meet The Fockers, and now Little Fockers but how does this movie match up. Well with a fantastic cast that includes Robert De Niro, Ben Stiller, Owen Wilson, Dustin Hoffman, Jerics Alba and all the other bunch are back aswell it feels abit lost compared to the other two movies, the first 20-25 minutes of the film i was really bored and let down, after that it starts picking up slowely and then it gets a bit funny, but by that time its to late, its the end of the movie. Little Fockers seemed to be alot more sillier than the other two movies in the series, Meet The Parents was a good movie i really enjoyed it, Meet The Fockers wasn't as good but it was still an okay movie, but Little Fockers there's not really a story and the whole movie just doesn't seem to work.
http://www.filmofilia.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Little_fockers_02.jpg-535x355.jpg
Well ok the movie does have some Laugh towards the end that mainely come from Owen Wilson and Dustin Hoffman but as a whole the movie was abit slow and had me abit bored. Little Fockers was yet again another 2010 sequel that can be added to the 2010 list of bad sequels and remakes but oh well bring on 2011..
1.5
It has taken 10 years, two little Fockers with wife Pam (Polo) and countless hurdles for Greg to finally get "in" with his tightly wound father-in-law, Jack. After the cash-strapped dad takes a job moonlighting for a drug company, however, Jack's suspicions about his favorite male nurse come roaring back. When Greg and Pam's entire clan-including Pam's lovelorn ex, Kevin (Owen Wilson)-descends for the twins' birthday party, Greg must prove to the skeptical Jack that he's fully capable as the man of the house. But with all the misunderstandings, spying and covert missions, will Greg pass Jack's final test and become the family's next patriarch...or will the circle of trust be broken for good? (imdb)
Well Little Fockers sets up the trilogy with these movies now, we had Meet The Parents, Meet The Fockers, and now Little Fockers but how does this movie match up. Well with a fantastic cast that includes Robert De Niro, Ben Stiller, Owen Wilson, Dustin Hoffman, Jerics Alba and all the other bunch are back aswell it feels abit lost compared to the other two movies, the first 20-25 minutes of the film i was really bored and let down, after that it starts picking up slowely and then it gets a bit funny, but by that time its to late, its the end of the movie. Little Fockers seemed to be alot more sillier than the other two movies in the series, Meet The Parents was a good movie i really enjoyed it, Meet The Fockers wasn't as good but it was still an okay movie, but Little Fockers there's not really a story and the whole movie just doesn't seem to work.
http://www.filmofilia.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Little_fockers_02.jpg-535x355.jpg
Well ok the movie does have some Laugh towards the end that mainely come from Owen Wilson and Dustin Hoffman but as a whole the movie was abit slow and had me abit bored. Little Fockers was yet again another 2010 sequel that can be added to the 2010 list of bad sequels and remakes but oh well bring on 2011..
1.5