Isn't that totally backwards? If you think one of them is incorrect, but honestly believes what they're doing is good, that's less cause to despise them than someone who's cynically supporting things whose efficacy they don't believe in just for their own benefit.
So because someone believes that what they're doing is good, they're exempt from criticism? Obviously beliefs are personal, and when you talking about disliking someone for their opinions, you're comparing them to your own, I think it's fair to despise someone
even if they have good intentions.
This really feels less like a moral judgment and more like an ideological contortion based on trying to believe that being a conservative is inherently evil, rather than merely mistaken. If the only two descriptions of your intellectual opponents are "evil, or evil and lying?" then maybe it's time to venture into new communities of thought.
There's a difference between despising someone, and in this case I despise their beliefs, I extremely disagree with what they believe, than believing they are inherently evil, and for the record, I don't think either Trump or Cruz are.
Obviously you can argue that their beliefs are shared by the large amount of people that voted for them, or in Cruz's case, are built upon Republican values, so I should give them some merit or thought instead of dismissing them and being un-open to discussion, which I'm willing to do, but I think there's absolutely nothing wrong with stating an opinion that you despise someone, despite their intentions. I would say it's fair to dislike someone more based on their personal beliefs, rather than how the act in front of others, in fact I'd say this is logic that everyone will have used in their life at some point.