Donald Trump for President?

Kinda looking more like the Iron Pyrite Rule.

Stop attacking Ted, Yoda!!!!!

Silence, you! I'm trying to DESTROY someone here.

"Gorilla douche" and "Barf gorilla".....Ive lost the will to live. He sounds like Ned Flanders on a bender. Learn how to insult, lad.

Sorry to distract yall from the distractor, but Ive feeling Mr President Elect is gonna have some gross news leakage, and things may even turn uglier the next year or so..

Also, and this is a serious question, is there a pick for a cabinet Trump has made that was regarded as sound?

That really is a serious question, is there?

When his least controversial pick seems to be the wife of Mitch McConnell, I'd have to say not really. But it's a question I'd like answered myself.

__________________
I may go back to hating you. It was more fun.

Two Twitter accounts I want to promote.

@shannonwoodward (Elsie from Westworld).

@vincentdonofrio (You should know who he is ) Is a proud liberal, and stands up to the Trumpsters in a direct yet jovial way. The guy seems like hes extremely genuine constantly answering questions about acting, schools, and what not.

They arent putting on any image for the public, are very accessible, and educated in what they speak about.

All of those are responses to a previous attack from either Tongo or you, which you would know if you weren't a really bad administrator with a double standard

Right, I forgot about that provision in the Golden Rule where you can say whatever you want if someone criticizes you first.

It's easy to forget that the full quote is actually "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you, unless they're haters or biased."

Long as you realize each and all of those responses are a repeat or direct synonym of an attack by you or one of your members you hold a double standard for. So yea, the Golden Rule says treat others how you'd like to be treated. That being the case, and all of these being a case of you or your guys going at it first, that's why it happens

I notice you didn't reproduce all of the quotes I listed. That's because you realize not all of them were not a "repeat or direct synonym" of what was said to you, right?

Do you seriously not understand the difference between "treat others how you would like to be treated" and "treat people however they're treating you"?

A standard of treating others how you'd like to be treated quickly devolves into treat people however they're treating you when the administrator applies his standards unevenly to his members

At this point I'm operating realizing Yoda doesn't realize Darth Vader saved the universe



No more training do you require. Already know you, that which you need.
Then I am a Jedi.
No. Not yet. One thing remains. Vader. You must confront Vader. Then, only then, a Jedi will you be. And confront him you will.



Or I'm having fun celebrating President Trump, whatevz

In other words, you're admitting all that "Golden Rule" stuff was bunk.

And an even standard is not some mindless 50/50 split that you maintain no matter what: being even-handed means considering how people respond. And yeah, shocker, the side that at least occasionally concedes points ends up arguing less than the one stubbornly refusing to engage meaningfully with anything.

What has the fact that Yoda is an Administrator here got to do with anything? Seriously, i don't get what you mean? Unless something has been happening elsewhere i've only seen him reply to you as a member not a moderator, he hasn't banned you or as far as i'm aware deleted your posts, and he hasn't threatened to ban you either. If anything he's tolerated this nonsense; by that i mean the must be 100 page now repetitive non-argument for much longer than he should have.

Who has he been applying different standards to? Has he been favouring TONGO or Iro or Ash or whoever over you? Him agreeing with what they say over you doesn't mean he is using his position as an administrator to favour them and/or punish you,

I don't think he gets that even handedness does not mean responding to every one the same way: it means holding everyone to the same standard.

So if one side is thoughtful and concedes things, they'll obviously get a different response from one that lashes out defensively, digs in its heels, and denies things for which there is objective proof.

You say that to the person who actually responded more thoughtfully than anyone in this campaign. Link. Link. That is bc you are an administrator who chose to apply a double standard to members, for your reasons

You already said this, and I already replied twice. Here they are again:

Can you link to anyone else you pressed? Guarantee no one offered more words

I thought not.

TERRIBLE Administrator

Can you link to anyone else who stonewalled on every issue? No? Then I guess it's not really comparable, is it?

Why would word count matter? What matters is what they say. And yours don't respond to anything.

I'd say that's a pretty good summary of your behavior, yeah.

You know what a terrible administrator would do? They'd treat respectful disagreement and conciliatory responses exactly the same way they treated ignorant, stubborn ones.

An admin can have whatever political views they like: what makes them good or bad as an admin is whether they enforce the rules fairly. And I challenge you to show me one instance where I've applied the rules differently to you than anyone else.