0
True, in a way, but the main problem is that they will not make a good "Dead zone" as the other one was or as good as the book is, they will make it with a lot of CG, bad acting and bad directing. Just look at what has "The children of the corn" remake looks like now, with all it`s special effects, it`s not worth the name Stephen King. Maybe a little make up for the new release of "Dead zone" or a directors cut would do the trick and make it look "newer". The truth is that since "The stand" every adaptation of Kings book (except "The shawshank redemption" and "Green Mile" which are not low budget films, and contain good direction and cast) was solid, or bad, and the almost pointless and disgusting making of American version of von Triers "Kingdom hospital" ("Riget") is not worth the name or the rep of the great King. Maybe it`s high time for some good, acclaimed director who likes King and his books to make a film based on his book, not a remake. Put the past behind, digging it up and remaking it is not worth the trouble, the money and nerves to make.