Iro's Film Diary

→ in
Tools    





28 days...6 hours...42 minutes...12 seconds
I watched the hell out of Broken Arrow when I was a kid.

"Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?"
__________________
"A laugh can be a very powerful thing. Why, sometimes in life, it's the only weapon we have."

Suspect's Reviews



I imagine that "most things" does not include Super Mario Bros.
Had I wanted to see that film, that'd be a nice bonus. But it's not a reason to watch a film.
__________________
5-time MoFo Award winner.



Welcome to the human race...
#134 - Chimes at Midnight
Orson Welles, 1965



In medieval England, a prince who spends his time around a roguish knight and his followers soon becomes caught up in a battle for the throne.

With Chimes at Midnight, Orson Welles plays fast and loose with Shakespeare by creating a film that favours a piecemeal amalgamation of multiple plays rather than a by-the-book adaptation of any particular one. In doing so, he creates a film that does a good job of capturing the spirit of the Bard if not necessarily replicating every exact line. As the heavyset and affably dishonourable Falstaff, Welles delivers a grandstanding performance as he presides over a good cast that run the gamut from thieving low-lifes to stuffy noblemen, all of which are able to deliver many reams of labyrinthine dialogue with aplomb (if not necessarily with the tightest lip-syncing). The deft balancing of tone is reflected in the technique as both camerawork and editing will change pace and fluidity in order to best reflect whatever's happening - bawdy scenes of comedy result in playful shots while dramatic moments demand respectful austerity. Even scenes that mix the two, such as the epic battle sequence that occurs roughly halfway through the film, don't lack for competence in any regard. Though its reputation threatened to make the resulting film underwhelming as a result, I still found a lot to like about a film that could have been dry or dull but instead ended up being a good encapsulation of what is so enjoyable about Shakespeare.

__________________
I really just want you all angry and confused the whole time.
Iro's Top 100 Movies v3.0



Welcome to the human race...
#135 - Fist of Legend
Gordon Chan, 1994



During the Japanese occupation of Shanghai in the 1930s, a Chinese student returns home to get revenge on the people responsible for his master's death.

Though I don't doubt that Jet Li is a very talented martial artist, I tend not to think too much of the films in which he appears. Fist of Legend is no exception in this regard, especially since its tale about rebellious Chinese martial artist Chen Zhen already served as the basis for Bruce Lee's Fist of Fury. Though I know not to compare the two films or their leads, Fist of Legend is still quite underwhelming on its own terms. The main issue is its sheer blandness - while this could be expected given the genre's tendency to downplay plot and character development in favour of its more visceral elements, it becomes an issue when it comes to the action itself (which is arguably constricted on a creative level by the specifics of both story and setting). Li may be a decent performer but there is something strangely boring about watching him move and fight in this film (the same could be said of Gordon Chan's extremely workmanlike direction, which struggles to inject energy into the proceedings). The problem seems to be that there aren't any good set-pieces for the most part - while there are one or two exceptions in the film's third act (the finale alone is worth a look), that's naturally not enough to buoy an entire film and thus results in one extremely tedious excuse for a martial-arts extravaganza.




Originally Posted by Iroquois
Of course you would.
I thought it was funny.

I was most disappointed when they teased Bruce Campbell at the end, but then he wasn't in the sequel.

#135 - Fist of Legend

Oooh... near the top of my watchlist.
__________________
Movie Reviews | Anime Reviews
Top 100 Action Movie Countdown (2015): List | Thread
"Well, at least your intentions behind the UTTERLY DEVASTATING FAULTS IN YOUR LOGIC are good." - Captain Steel



Welcome to the human race...
#136 - The Piano Teacher
Michael Haneke, 2001



A dysfunctional music professor seeks a way to act on her repressed sexual desires.

While I'm still not sure if Michael Haneke is a filmmaker whose work you can ever truly like, The Piano Teacher seems to make a more significant impression than the other Haneke films I've seen (as of writing, this includes the original Funny Games and Amour). The premise about Isabelle Huppert's sado-masochistic piano teacher handling (or creating) a variety of problems ranging from under-performing students to a domineering mother features Haneke's typically dispassionate approach that creates many different types of discomfort as it progresses very slowly and methodically through its increasingly twisted events. The end result is an extremely unsettling piece of work that crafts complicated characters and pits them against one another again and again across numerous scenes that are agonising not just in terms of their content but also because of the sheer length and pacing involved.




Welcome to the human race...
#137 - Captain America: The Winter Soldier
Anthony Russo and Joe Russo, 2014



A super-soldier is forced to go rogue when his organisation is compromised.

I'm not entirely convinced that MCU movies can really hold up to repeat viewings in my eyes - they can be fun little affairs the first time around but the appeal does tend to be undermined by a second watch. Captain America: The Winter Soldier admittedly falls into this category, but the effect isn't significant enough to ruin the film for me. A lot of that is down to its relatively ambitious approach to narrative, opting to forgo campy villains and MacGuffin hunts in favour of a relatively grounded plot involving a supposedly eradicated evil conspiracy forcing the upstanding hero onto the run. Though it does fall into a few familiar holes here and there while also featuring some notably absurd developments, the characters involved have some good interplay and the plot is still kept running smoothly enough to sufficiently override the flaws. The action is executed well enough even as it does lapse into effects-heavy displays of shiny destruction towards the film's close, but what really helps The Winter Soldier weather a second viewing is definitely the layer of charm that builds from a combination of good characters fighting their way through an extended homage to old-school conspiracy thrillers.




Welcome to the human race...
I thought it was funny.

I was most disappointed when they teased Bruce Campbell at the end, but then he wasn't in the sequel
Yeah, 'tis a shame. I kind of feel like it's a film that could actually use a reboot, but I guess now that Deadpool is a thing, there's not much demand for another R-rated superhero movie about a heavily-scarred anti-hero going after the sadistic villains who made him what he is.

Oooh... near the top of my watchlist.
Let me guess - TONGO?



28 days...6 hours...42 minutes...12 seconds
#137 - Captain America: The Winter Soldier
Anthony Russo and Joe Russo, 2014

This poster always made me laugh.

Just what the hell is ScarJo doing? She looks like she's ready to bust a move.



Welcome to the human race...
This poster always made me laugh.

Just what the hell is ScarJo doing? She looks like she's ready to bust a move.
To say nothing of the awkward leg-bending that Evans and SLJ are doing.



This poster always made me laugh.

Just what the hell is ScarJo doing? She looks like she's ready to bust a move.
It's a good look for her I might add.

It reminded me of the Sixties Bond posters, especially Diana Rigg's character on the poster for On Her Majesty's Secret Service. They have the term "surfing" now for awkwardly posed characters on posters or such like, which I think is very funny. They're basically trying to look active even though they're stock still. I can't stand it in some cases but here I think it worked, although not in this particular image.



This poster always made me laugh.

Just what the hell is ScarJo doing? She looks like she's ready to bust a move.
Wait a minute... This isn't the right poster. For one, Captain America has his helmet on.



Wait a minute... This isn't the right poster. For one, Captain America has his helmet on.
Also, doesn't Black Widow usually have guns in her hands? (Hark at me, I haven't even seen the films).



Welcome to the human race...
#138 - Captain America: Civil War
Anthony Russo and Joe Russo, 2016



When the U.S government plans to put a collective of superheroes under their control, one of their number launches his own rebellion in order to protect his friend.

After a dozen feature films and multiple off-shoots in other media, it's easy to get fatigued by the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Though the individual films make a reasonably strong effort to build off of one another while creating new worlds and characters with each successive installment, that's not necessarily a guarantee that each film will hold up on its own merits. Even characters getting not just one but two or three stand-alone outings aren't guaranteed to maintain a consistent level of quality between films. This seems rather true when it comes to Iron Man, whose initial solo venture served as the launching pad for the MCU but whose subsequent movies demonstrated diminishing returns. Conversely, Captain America got something of a rocky start with wartime prequel The First Avenger, yet immediate follow-up The Winter Soldier marked a noticeable improvement and resulted in one of the most solid MCU films yet. Between the extrapolation of that particular pattern and the fact that the film's central conflict sees these well-established heroes square off against one another due to a complex ideological difference, it's understandable to have high expectations for Civil War, but that doesn't necessarily mean that it will live up to those expectations.

Captain America: Civil War begins with the latest Avengers line-up carrying out a mission that, while ultimately successful, results in a significant amount of destruction and even a handful of accidental deaths. When combined with the catastrophic events of previous MCU films, it causes the powers that be to propose that some regulations and direction be imposed on the Avengers. The affected individuals are naturally divided on whether or not such a course is such a good idea, with two figureheads emerging on both sides of the issue; Iron Man (Robert Downey Jr.) feels that the new ruling is a vital necessity, while Captain America (Chris Evans) sees it as a potentially debilitating restriction. As if that wasn't enough trouble for the heroes in question, there is still the matter of a mysterious foreigner (Daniel Brühl) carrying out his own fiendish agenda that ties into the sudden reappearance of the Winter Soldier (Sebastian Stan), who has been in hiding since the events of The Winter Soldier and is struggling to come to terms with his true nature even as it threatens to bring everything crashing down. There are quite a few narrative threads to juggle here as characters old and new enter the fray, yet the film pulls it off reasonably well with nary a dull moment in sight. It even manages to find a new approach to handling the well-worn origin story of a certain costumed crusader while dedicating a significant and well-spent time to developing a genuine interesting new character in Black Panther (Chadwick Boseman). Of course, this does mean that Brühl's actual villain does fall by the wayside a bit but is given enough to work with so as to stand out from your typical megalomaniac supervillain.

A trend I've seen gain some prominence in recent franchise sequels involves narratives that examine the consequences of the heroes' actions, often in a way where certain authority figures decide that the heroes should at the very least be held accountable for the collateral damage caused by their actions and possibly prevented from carrying out their ostensibly well-intentioned missions. Of course, it's pretty much a given with these types of movie that the heroes will be vindicated by the story's end as their actions not only stop the villain but prove the naysayers wrong - this can be a hard thing to pull off effectively without condoning some genuinely questionable or reprehensible actions on the part of the heroes. Civil War has its work cut out in trying to surmount this challenge; as if the title doesn't give away a certain amount of bias as to which side of the issue the film will lean towards, it still has to set up two conflicting approaches to the issue of superhero control and try to give each side's views some decent representation. Though Civil War still isn't able to give the most nuanced take on such material, it certainly gives it a good shot that is not ponderous enough to drag down the film nor is it flimsy enough to really feel like a manufactured excuse to see superheroes fight. It's also remarkable in that this particular narrative concern doesn't get dropped completely as the film proceeds, informing much of the story's action from start to finish.

Of course, if there is one thing that does especially bother me about Civil War, it's the rather haphazard quality of the action itself. The main flaw that keeps the action from being great is a tendency towards the exact kind of frantic, high-speed action camerawork that can't help but feel insincere in its attempts to inject excitement into fights and chases. While not every action scene in the film is dependent on it, its presence is still very unwelcome. Fortunately, the film still has its fair share of good action scenes in spite of this approach. In keeping with the plot's decision to factor in the ramifications of the heroes' actions, there are the odd spots of destruction in populated areas. While this may tie in with the aforementioned camerawork issues, it's good to see that the film gets that out of the way before too long and instead gets to scenes that emphasise combat between characters in genuinely isolated areas. Seeing various heroes come to blows in a number of scenarios is definitely the main selling point here and the film definitely delivers in that regard, capturing the sort of giddy excitement that characterises the MCU at its very best. Having the characters exchange constant banter mid-combat is at once a plus and a minus as the hit-miss ratio of the jokes and one-liners can vary quite wildly from scene to scene, but it definitely provides some much-needed personality when certain parts of a given sequence may start to get a little tiring.

There doesn't seem to be much point in recommending MCU films to anyone who's not already keeping up with each new release, but Captain America: Civil War is up there as one of the franchise's better stand-alone installments and might actually be worth a look on that basis. It serves as a fairly solid response to some of the superhero genre's more tiresome narrative clichés, though it does have a habit of playing into some of the less tiresome ones in the process. It boasts an impressive enough casts of MCU veterans and newcomers that can hold their own against one another in both physical and verbal exchanges, with much of the appeal coming from the colourful interplay between the cast more so than any displays of visceral thrills. Though I can already feel the effect wearing off as I organise my thoughts and type this, I can't deny that this was fun to watch and delivered reasonably well when it came to backing up its hype.




My problem is the believability that bucky and cap could stand equal to iron mans suit power. My feeling is cap won because its a cap movie because clearly iron man can create a suit too go against hulk or a Thor but two boys from Brooklyn is too much.



28 days...6 hours...42 minutes...12 seconds
My problem is the believability that bucky and cap could stand equal to iron mans suit power. My feeling is cap won because its a cap movie because clearly iron man can create a suit too go against hulk or a Thor but two boys from Brooklyn is too much.

Is this a spoiler?



My problem is the believability that bucky and cap could stand equal to iron mans suit power. My feeling is cap won because its a cap movie because clearly iron man can create a suit too go against hulk or a Thor but two boys from Brooklyn is too much.

Is this a spoiler?
No spoiler it my overall opinion by the trailer.