JayDee's Movie Musings

→ in
Tools    





Miss Vicky's Loyal and Willing Slave
Thanks for the appreciation everyone, glad you enjoyed my Aviator review.

Oh and as for people recommending other films of his to watch I've already finished my Scorsese season for the moment. It's just that due to the backlog I have on my reviews they are only just now seeing the light of day.

Do JayDee watches Tarr and I will read whatever you write, no matter the length.
Hmmm.....well that's....an idea.

I'll just go and get a bunch of
ratings ready!

Also, had no idea you had OCD. I guess that helps with writing these awesome reviews.
Yes I do indeed, I've kind of mentioned some of my problems before in my reviews, Pump Up the Volume and Perks of Being a Wallflower for certain, maybe some others as well.



Miss Vicky's Loyal and Willing Slave
Time for the second installment of JayDee Does Marty. Now as the more eagle-eyed of you will notice I make reference at that start of the review to After Hours. After Hours was the second film I watched as part of the season but it didn't inspire a full review, instead a shorter one which will appear further down the line.


mirror
mirror

Year of release
2010

Directed by
Martin Scorsese

Written by
Laeta Kalogridis

Starring
Leonardo DiCaprio
Mark Ruffalo
Ben Kingsley
Michelle Williams
Max Von Sydow
Emily Mortimer

Shutter Island


Plot - In 1954, Federal Marshal Teddy Daniels (DiCaprio) and his new partner Chuck Aule (Ruffalo) travel to Shutter Island to investigate the disappearance of a patient from Ashecliffe Hospital for the criminally insane. The patient's name was Rachel Solando who had been sanctioned at the institute after she drowned her three kids. Teddy is a veteran WWII soldier, traumatized by his experience in the liberation of the Dachau concentration camp and the loss of his beloved wife in a criminal fire. Unable to access the records of employees and patients at Ashecliffe, he feels like his investigation is being obstructed by the facility's management, namely by head psychiatrist Dr. John Cawley (Kinglsey). While on the island Teddy suffers from several migraines and is laid up in bed as a storm engulfs the island, leaving Teddy and Chuck trapped. His interviews with the facility's patients lead him to the island's lighthouse where rumours of dark experiments run rampant. It is there that he will discover the mystery of Shutter Island.

I found Shutter Island to have the opposite appeal of After Hours. Early on and for a good long while I found myself really quite enthralled, but the longer the film went on the more I found my interest beginning to slowly wane away. On a technical level I think the film was made to the absolute highest of standards with the direction, sound and cinematography being stand-outs. Where I had problems was mainly with the story itself. The film is a psychological thriller that feels like it would be very much at home in the 50s or 70s, and I imagine would have thrived there. These days however it just feels a little bit old hat, and I think modern audiences are so trained in searching out twists that any mystery or shock value will be lost. In a way it reminded me of the David Fincher film, The Game. Like that film, Shutter Island sets up a very intriguing premise but just starts to crumble a little under the sheer incredulity of it all.

Where the film really suffered I personally felt was in the script. Too much of it was just too obvious and telegraphed to really have me on the edge of my seat. And I began to find it a slightly frustrating experience with the story taking us and the characters round in circles, with what felt like a lot of repetition. Now that worked in the sense of making the characters feel like they were rats in a maze and keeping them disorientated, but for me it just hurt the momentum and I felt my interest waning on occasion. I just thought that in the end the film was overlong and a touch heavy on dialogue; some scenes really did suffer from being overtalky in attempts to spell everything out. Even with the weaknesses of the story however I felt that Scorsese certainly did his best to retain what mystery there is, creating a very ghostly and spine-tingling tone. While the twist and plotting may have been obvious, he made the unravelling of the mystery interesting enough that it didn't completely fall apart.

And given the subject matter he had to work with, I think that Scorsese does a really quite excellent job. In conjunction with Robert Richardson's cinematography the film's imagery is frequently very striking and haunting. Right from the opening frames you can just tell that you're in for a treat on that front. As the island looms into view out of the thick fog we are instantly presented with this bleak and foreboding spectre. From there Richardson delivers a masterclass in cinematography, building a great sense of dread and paranoia. As one of the characters says, “there's a storm coming.” Where the visuals truly astonish however are in Daniels' flashbacks and dreams, scenes which are just incredible snatches of filmmaking. There is one dream sequence in particular that really wowed me, it seems Daniels hugging his wife as ash falls from the sky all around them, covering everything in their home like a fine dusting of snow. As their embrace continues, his wife herself turns to ash and crumbles through his arms. As well as just being a striking visual, the cinematography here really draws your attention as it is so different from the rest of the film. Whereas everything else is very grim and disquieting, the colours here are so bold and vivid. At that point the film very much evoked memories of the Hitchcock classic Vertigo. And it wasn't the only occasion where I got those feelings.

Film Trivia Snippets - Shutter Island was originally commissioned as a directing vehicle for Wolfgang Petersen. To fit more closely to Petersen's style however, considerable modifications were made to Dennis Lehane's novel in order to create a more action-driven blockbuster. When that fell through another director who was considered was David Fincher. /// When it came to creating the mood for the film, one of the main inspirations for Scorsese were the 1940s zombie movies of Val Lewton. While to give his actors an idea of how the film would look stylistically, Martin Scorsese screened both Out of the Past and Vertigo for the cast and crew. /// Before they settled on Mark Ruffalo, Leonardi DiCaprio and Martin Scorsese also considered both Robert Downey Jr. and Josh Brolin for the role of Chuck Aule. /// The movie's $40.2 million opening weekend take in the United States marked a career best for Scorsese. It went on to gross over $293 million worldwide, making it the highest grossing film of his career. /// Shutter Island was originally scheduled for release on the 2nd of October, 2009 so that it would be in contention for the Oscars. Paramount postponed the film however because their remaining yearly marketing and Oscars campaigning budget could not afford the required $50-60 to promote the film in addition to Up in the Air and The Lovely Bones. /// The traumatic killing of the Nazi guards at Dachau concentration camp that is depicted in the film is a historical event, taking place on 29 April 1945 when the camp was liberated by the US Army.
Quite often I got the sense that Shutter Island was almost Scorsese's homage/tribute to the Master of Suspense. Alongside the use of colour the whole mood is that haunting, claustrophobic tone that Hitchcock often created, while instead of going for a series of cheap jump scares the film is more interested is building a sense of suspense and tension. Even the way it's shot evokes Hitch at points I felt with sweeping and rotating shots, extreme close-ups and its use of lighting. I loved how Scorsese set the scene at the asylum. As the characters enter the imposing facility the camera moves into an almost first-person point of view, placing us firmly in the position of the characters, really making us feel the sense of dread of the place. And then when they make it through the gates all of the inmates faces are so grim and menacing that it sends a chill down the spine. Oh and Ward C! Man that was one creepy, f*cked-up rats maze of a place. Scorsese just makes the whole place so damn eerie.

Another strong element I thought was its sound design. Its score was quite an interesting concoction. In many ways the music was actually quite minimal, heightening the level of realism and refusing to give the viewer any refuge from the awkwardness and claustrophobia of the situation. When the music does kick in however it is very brooding, ominous and overpowering. The union between the two creates a rather unbalanced experience, one that works well with the film's subject.

The highlight of the film for me was another very strong performance from Leonardo DiCaprio, quite the powerhouse as Edward Daniels. Initially starting off as very aggressive, intense and confrontational, as the film progresses we see more to his character, coming across as this damaged, scarred individual racked with guilt. He takes this character that starts off seemingly in complete control, and before long has taken him to the edges of his sanity. While this is certainly DiCaprio's show, the acting in Shutter Island is pretty damn strong throughout the whole ensemble. As his partner, Mark Ruffalo may not have a whole lot to do other than be a side-kick and just give Leo someone to bounce off of, but it's a sign of his ability that despite this he is still able to make an impression as the sardonic Chuck. As Dr. Cawley, the institute's lead psychiatrist and in Daniels' eyes the mastermind behind the whole conspiracy, there's the considerable presence that is Sir Ben Kingsley, bringing a very assured and enigmatic quality to the character. In fairly minor roles I thought that both Michelle Williams and Emily Mortimer both came off strong. I'd like to single out Mortimer in particular. I've got to say that between this, "The Newsroom" and Lars and the Real Girl I am really becoming quite a big fan of Mortimer. And the fact that I find her adorable certainly doesn't hurt. Oh and lastly, can Max von Sydow please make more movies? I know he's in his 80s now I believe and I don't know what his general health is like, but if he is able to I'd love to see him on the screen more. Even in such a minor role he just brings such great gravitas and sense of character to his ghoulish Dr. Naehring. He's someone that you just can't help but pay attention to when he pops up.

Conclusion - I know that there are a number of people who rather love this film but I just didn't quite make it to that level of appreciation. That was largely as a result of what I found to be a fairly underwhelming and predictable narrative. Perhaps my expectations weren't quite right. I was expecting an intelligent psychological thriller, instead it was more of a pulpy, B-movie genre film. And on those terms it was good fun. The shortfalls in the script were certainly made up for by the superlative efforts of Scorsese and Richardson who crafted a beautiful looking filming of great atmosphere and paranoia.

PS - The rating I gave this film came about instantly after I finished watching the film, which was probably a couple of months ago now. Looking at it now I wonder if I was a little harsh on the film, with the disappointing conclusion sabotaging the rest of the film. With some more time now passed I feel it could perhaps be a little higher. And on a future viewing it may well be.



I think you're looking too much at the film in terms of genre and story - which, yes, has very much been done (even as far back as The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari) To me, the strength of the film lies more in its characters and their motivations, but I'm glad you had some appreciation for it.

I personally rate it a
+



Women will be your undoing, Pépé
been a while since seeing Shutter Island and I rather enjoyed the ending. The storyline, for me, felt something that had been done and redone again and the twist really pulled it out of that.
And i fully agree on the cinematic intensity of the film. Truly great stuff.



"Hey Look it's Masterman"
Shutter Island is one of the best horror movies in years, and what's funny is it's not even a horror .
__________________
--I Find Your Lack Of Faith Disturbing.



Miss Vicky's Loyal and Willing Slave
The third installment of JayDee Does Marty.


mirror
mirror

Year of release
2011

Directed by
Martin Scorsese

Written by
John Logan (script)
Brian Selznick (novel)

Starring
Asa Butterfield
Chloe Grace Moretz
Ben Kingsley
Sacha Baron Cohen
Helen McCrory

Hugo


Plot - Paris, 1931. Hugo Cabret (Butterfield) is a young orphan boy living in the walls of the Gare Montparnasse train station. His father was a man with a great knack for fixing clocks and other mechanical devices. When he tragically died in a fire, Hugo was taken in by his uncle Claude who put him to work keeping the train station clocks running. Back when his father was still alive, the two were fascinated by a broken automaton that his father had found abandoned in a museum, attempting to get it back working. Believing that the automaton holds a final message from his father Hugo now continues with these attempts, stealing whatever odds and ends he can get his hands on to aid him. However his thefts bring him to the attention of Papa Georges (Kingsley), a toymaker and shopkeeper in the station, who takes a notebook from Hugo that his father wrote and drew in. In his attempts to get it back, Hugo meets the acquaintance of Georges' god-daughter Isabelle (Moretz) who promises to help him and together they set off on an adventure, one that will hold some surprising discoveries about Papa Georges' past and reveal a startling connection between him and Hugo's automaton.

Following in the footsteps of After Hours this was another film where I really wasn't sure what exactly to expect. Martin Scorsese, king of the gangster film, making what essentially appeared to be a kiddie movie? I had my reservations. Also in the footsteps of After Hours however, Marty once again came along and blew those reservations away. I found Hugo to be an absolute delight, just an immensely charming and magical little film.

At one point in the movie, Chloe Grace Moretz's character says to young Hugo, “Thank you for the movie today....it was a gift.” And that seems to aptly sum up the sentiments that Martin Scorsese is attempting to convey with Hugo. There can be very few people on the planet who can match Marty in terms of passion and knowledge of the history of cinema. And this certainly feels like his love letter to cinema and its early pioneers, led by George Méliès. Some of the moments that he comes up with are just wonderful. The scene in which Hugo introduces Isabelle to the magic of the movies has got to be one of my favourite scenes in quite some time. It's magical stuff, and Moretz's joyous facial expressions are just a delight. It's not the only sublime scene to be found in Hugo. The sequences which see the automaton creak into life, and Méliès' drawings explode forth from their prison likewise put a smile on my face. Detailing the building blocks of cinema's early days also allows Scorsese to recreate some of the most iconic images from that time. The scenes featuring a recreation of an all-glass studio and the sets from Méliès' early productions are heartwarming and marvelous, largely because you can really feel the passion and reverence that Scorsese is putting into these scenes. In addition Scorsese also takes the opportunity to pay homage to some of early cinema's most enduring images; see the moment for example which has Hugo hanging onto the hands of a clockface in a obvious nod to the famous scene where Harold Lloyd dangles from a clockface in Safety Last!

Collaborating again with Robert Richardson, also the cinematographer on Shutter Island and The Aviator, once more proves fruitful for Scorsese who is able to deliver another movie that is just gorgeous to behold. Richardson cloaks the film in golden hues and bright tones and just creates such a sense of warmth that fits perfectly with the story. It's no surprise to discover that Richardson was awarded the Oscar for Best Cinematography at that year's Academy Awards. And some of the shots that Scorsese crafts are once again tremendous. The opening shot in particular is just an absolute treat. Opening on the gears and springs of a clock the image transitions by way of a slow fade to the bustling streets of Paris. The camera then sweeps across the city to its destination of the train station, along its platform, up and into the clockface, behind which we find young Hugo. It is just the first of many beautiful shots.

Film Trivia Snippets – I just mentioned the opening tracking shot of the film there. It was the very first shot designed for the film and it took a whole year to complete. It required 1000 computers to render each frame required for the shot. /// Martin Scorsese and Christopher Lee have been very good friends for a long time but had never worked together before Hugo. When Scorsese asked him about appearing in Hugo Lee's response was “It's about time!” /// This was Martin Scorsese's first film in 12 years not to star Leonardo DiCaprio. The last time that happened was with 1999's Bringing Out the Dead. /// During the early tracking shot that introduces us to the interior of the train station, there are appearances by characters who represent Django Reinhardt, James Joyce and Winston Churchill. /// When it came to how Ben Kingsley would portray the character of George Méliès, he based his characterisation on Martin Scorsese himself. /// The driving force behind the film was Martin Scorsese's young daughter Francesca who presented him a copy of Brian Selznick's book as a birthday gift hoping that he would make a film out of it someday. It was also her suggestion to have the film presented in 3D format. And when it came to how to direct the 3D cinematography Scorsese did so by wearing clip-on 3D lenses over his prescription glasses. /// During the flashbacks we see George Méliès staging his productions with lavishly colored sets and costumes. The real Méliès only used sets, costumes and make-up in grayscale, since coloured elements might turn out the wrong shade of gray on black and white film. Many of the prints were then hand tinted in post-production.
And the clockwork imagery that populates the entire film is extraordinarily charming. Given the intricate nature of the clockwork mechanisms it should perhaps come as no surprise to find Scorsese having such an affinity for its workings. As a director he comes off as such a craftsman that I can see why he'd appreciate the way in which all the gears and springs have to work together in conjuncture for the clock to function, similar to how all the different departments and individuals on a movie production have to come together to produce a finished project. Oh and with all the clockwork on show I imagine this is like a porno to Guillermo del Toro! The Parisian train station where the vast majority of the film is set is a terrifically evocative and richly detailed location; it's quaint, magical and 'oh so French' quality made me think that Amélie Poulain was likely to pop into shot at any moment. It's a realistic setting, but one that is also slightly on the fantastical side. That's on the surface but it's also a great creation behind that exterior, a complex maze of passages and rooms hidden from the public where Hugo lives and works. It sort of reminded me of the scenes in Star Trek with characters in the jefferies tubes, moving within the heart of the starships.

However perhaps the most impressive aspect of Scorsese's efforts is the performance he is able to coax out of young Asa Butterfield in the role of the eponymous Hugo Cabret. Butterfield, just 13 at the time of filming, does a superlative job at the heart of the film, proving to be a very mature and engaging presence. Together Scorsese and Butterfield make sure to pitch the character perfectly, making sure he doesn't fall into the trap of being too cute or too precocious. Oh and he's got to have the bluest eyes I've ever seen. As his partner-in-crime, or partner-in-adventure to be more accurate, Chloe Grace Moretz is also excellent. She just has such a delightful, endearing quality to her that I found it almost impossible to think that she was also the little girl in Kick Ass that was slaughtering everyone and throwing around the 'c word.' Some highly experienced adult actors also impress and bring a great warmth to proceedings, namely Ben Kingsley, Christopher Lee and Helen McRory. Kingsley and McRory also bring great emotion and sadness to their story thread about lost dreams and regrets. In the role of the Station Inspector, Sacha Baron Cohen is probably the closest the film comes to fulfilling its façade as a children's film, delivering a very broad and cartoonish creation that sees Cohen apparently channeling Peter Sellers' Inspector Clouseau. Even here however the character is revealed to have a heart and a gentler side through his bumbling attempts to romance Emily Mortimer's flower girl, Lisette.

Taking its narrative from Brian Selznick's novel “The Invention of Hugo Cabret”, the film has a lovely story at its heart; one that details both a young boy's grief over the loss of his father and his search for a final message from him, and an old man's regrets and longing for past glories. And as the story progresses these two threads are taken and skilfully woven together thanks to a few surprising and uplifting twists in the story. I loved the development of the Papa Georges character, initially building him up as this bitter, cantankerous individual before fleshing him out by exposing the reasons why he's like this and who exactly he is, forcing us to look at him in a different light and now eliciting a great deal of sympathy from the audience. Beyond the characters the film really is about the magic of cinema as I've already mentioned, and about finding and caring for the movies of the past. Scorsese has his own film company, The Film Foundation, who has made it its goal to preserve and restore films of the past, and bring them to the attention of audiences. In his own words he sums it up better than I ever could - “Movies touch our hearts and awaken our vision, and change the way we see things. They take us to other places, they open doors and minds. Movies are the memories of our lifetime, we need to keep them alive.”

Conclusion - The thought of Martin Scorsese making a family friendly kids film might seem odd on the surface but it's one that works out beautifully. As a film Hugo certainly has its flaws, and my mind was telling me it was miles away from being a perfect film. My heart however was telling me that it really wasn't all that far away at all. I just found it to be an utterly enchanting experience that looked just sumptuous, had a touching story and featured some terrific performances. I could be completely wrong but of the handful of Scorsese films I've seen now I get the feeling that this is his most heartfelt, the one that perhaps meant most to him. It's a profound and heartwarming little film.



That's a Scorsese movie? I didn't know that.

So sick of you doing Scorsese movies already.



I don't think there's a chance that JayDee would like [i]The Departed [i], he says he doesn't particularly like gangster films and he's not a fan of Jack Nicholson and his macho performances - and that role is one of his most over the top/crazy



Women will be your undoing, Pépé
Eh...ok? In what sense is your wow to be taken?
in the VERY HIGHEST of regards
I have heard very little about this movie except that it was a love letter to films, but now, reading your review, I have gotten to read a few paragraphs of that letter and was a bit on the speechless side when i was done -- in a VERY GOOD way.

I REALLY need to see this now when before it really didn't matter if i saw it or not



Miss Vicky's Loyal and Willing Slave
Sorry Sexy but we're not done yet


mirror
mirror

Year of release
1983

Directed by
Martin Scorsese

Written by
Paul D. Zimmerman

Starring
Robert De Niro
Jerry Lewis
Sandra Bernhard
Diahnne Abbott
Shelley Hack



The King of Comedy

-

Plot - Rupert Pupkin (De Niro) is a would be comedian who holds aspirations of greatness; aspirations that have reached the level of obsession. And in particular these obsessions have centred upon his comedy idol, talk show host Jerry Langford (Lewis). When he takes advantage of a situation and initiates a meeting with Jerry, he thinks he has made a real connection that will lead to him appearing on the show and becoming the star he so desperately desires to become. When his advances result in him simply being given the run-around, Rupert's attitudes and ideas take a dark turn. Teaming up with his fellow Jerry-obsessed friend Marsha (Bernhard), he concocts a plan to kidnap Jerry Langford and hold him ransom so that he can finally perform his stand-up routine for the show's millions of viewers.

Ah fame, she is a fickle mistress.

And that really is what this film is about. The great strength of The King of Comedy I felt was certainly to be found in its sharp and witty script. I'm not sure exactly how relevant the story was upon its release in 1983, but I can pretty much guarantee that it is more relevant today than it ever has been at any other time. Thirty years ago the film's central idea may have seemed rather ridiculous and far-fetched, these days however, not so much. While no-one has perhaps matched the actions of Rupert Pupkin in terms of their criminality - actually no that's not quite true is it? There was that television reporter in Brazil who was arrested for organising killings to boost the ratings of his TV show which focused on crime in the country. Well apart from a single rare occasion no-one may have matched the actions of Rupert Pupkin in terms of their criminality, however are some of the things we've seen people do in the quest for fame really all that much more distasteful? With all the reality and 'talent' shows that populate TV schedules these days terms such as 'celebrity' and 'TV star' have been completely b*stardised to the point of almost being an insult.

Rupert's ambitions really are a depressingly spot-on metaphor for the way that many would-be celebrities think these days. He doesn't want to tour the comedy club circuit, he doesn't want to hone his skills and work on his routine, he just wants his opportunity handed to him right now, he wants instant gratification. And that is something that is sadly common in this day and age. After all why should you work hard for years and years to become a great singer or comedian or actor when you can simply release a sex tape, embarrass yourself and your family on a 'reality' show or do something incredibly stupid or disgusting and upload it to youtube? Is there a sadder indictment of our current society that a girl was able to get somewhat famous purely because she ate her own tampon? Oh yeah, and as for everyone getting their 15 minutes of fame no matter how untalented they may be? Well these days that 15 minutes sadly seems to be lasting longer and longer. I just saw an ad on TV earlier promoting seasn 8 of Keeping Up With the Kardashians. Season Eight!!!

As well as a commentary on fame and the notion of celebrity, The King of Comedy also succeeds as a study in obsession. His very singular goal in life is to be famous, to have millions of people adore him and know his name. It's no accident on that front that Paul D. Zimmerman's script is full of instances of no-one being able to actually get his name right. In his mind he becomes convinced that the way he is going to achieve this level of fame is by appearing on The Jerry Langford Show, and as such he has actually linked his life and his experiences to Jerry himself. The film highlights the level of obsession that people can have for celebrities and the relationship that they can create between them in their mind. There's a great little scene in the film where Jerry is out walking the streets and an elderly woman recognises him, telling him what a big fan of his she is and asking for his autograph. She is using a payphone at the time and asks him to speak to her nephew on the other end of the line who is in hospital. Jerry refuses as he is in a rush, and in the blink of an eye the woman's attitude completely changes. She viciously snaps at him, telling him that he “should only get cancer! I hope you get cancer!” It's a wonderfully insightful snapshot of both the fleeting nature of celebrity and the expectations that the public have of you. Because they watch and support you, they somehow believe that entitles them to something from you. And that's the case with Rupert and Jerry. As a devout fan of his for years Rupert has imagined this friendship between the two men, and has convinced himself that not only will Jerry help him, but that it's his duty to help him. That incident on the street with the woman did actually happen to Jerry Lewis, and was included at Lewis' suggestion.

Film Trivia Snippets - During the scene where Rupert and Rita gatecrash their way into Jerry Langford's country home, Jerry Lewis got a distressing taste of De Niro's method acting style. Before they started filming, De Niro insulted Lewis with various anti-Semitic remarks which greatly angered him. Lewis had never worked with a method actor before and was shocked and appalled at this, but he was still able to deliver an extremely credible performance. /// During the scene where Robert De Niro and Sandra Bernhard argue out on the streets of New York, three of the individuals who heckle them may seem familiar to you. Credited as “street scum” you have Mick Jones, Joe Strummer and Paul Simonon, members of the British punk rock band, The Clash. Scorsese and De Niro were both huge fans of the band and regularly attended their New York shows. /// As well as making a cameo himself, Martin Scorsese made sure that it was a real family affair. His mother Catherine provides the voice of Rupert Pupkin's mother; his father Charles plays one of bar patrons during the scene where Rupert turns the TV on to show Rita he made it on the show; and his daughter Cathy plays a fan asking for Rupert's autograph during one of his fantasies.
As I've said before on this forum, and indeed quite recently (at the time of writing), I'm not really a fan of Robert De Niro. When it comes to a lot of his most celebrated performances I personally struggle to really warm to or admire them. There's just something about him in those kind of roles that I cannot connect with. That said however I have to admit that I thought he was really quite fantastic in this film as Rupert Pupkin. I know I'll be alone on this but I prefer when he subverts his gruff, macho image in the likes of Meet the Parents, Analyze This, Silver Linings Playbook, Stardust etc. And this performance certainly falls into that category. It's the performance of a real character actor I felt, creating an individual who is amusing and strangely endearing, but at the same time who is sad and rather unsettling. He really is such a pathetic fellow, dedicating his entire life to his delusional fantasies; fantasies that he indulges in down in his mother's basement and that are frequently interrupted by his mother. He has built his own replica of Jerry's set where he acts out these fantasies alongside cardboard cut-outs of Jerry and Liza Minelli. And he also has a entire wall covered in a print of a cheering audience that he likes to perform in front of. In a way he comes across as the ultimate optimist, completely oblivious to Jerry trying to give him the brush off, convincing himself that they are great friends. He is such a celebrity addict that he knows every single one of his fellow autograph hunters by name. Initially he comes across as a fairly harmless and feeble pest to Jerry; it's only at the half-way point when he is rejected by Jerry that he becomes really dangerous. There really is a very obvious link to De Niro's most famous creation, that of Travis Bickle.

Unlike Travis Bickle however I found Rupert Pupkin to be a surprisingly likeable and sympathetic individual, largely because I think we can all identify with the character in a way, no matter how pathetic we may find him. I think we all have these great designs for our life, the majority of which never pan out. And I think we all fantasise about being able to go back and show off to someone in our past about how well we are doing. In Rupert's case we see that in his fantasy about having his Principal telling him about how he and everyone at school was wrong and how Rupert was right. And even though he does eventually turn out to be dangerous, for the large part he seems pretty harmless, even quite pitiful. Even when he has committed his big criminal act he still comes across more often than not as this bumbling, clownish oaf. See the scene for example where he is orchestrating Jerry's phonecall regarding the instructions for getting Rupert on TV; he can't even get that right. We see him clumsily dropping cue cards, putting them in the wrong order, presenting them to Jerry upside down etc; a criminal mastermind he is not. And then in the concluding monologue that he is finally able to present on Jerry's show we perhaps get an insight into just why he has turned out the way he has. While we don't know how much of it is genuine and how much is just for comic reasons, we do get clues of a dark past that included bullying and a tough childhood. And there's one single line that perhaps explains his whole way of thought; “That was the only attention my father ever gave me.” As I said we don't know how much truth there is in this, but perhaps it is a little insight into why he has become so obsessed with fame, why he has become so fixated with getting as many people as possible to pay attention to him and what he has to say.

Film Trivia Snippets - Before Martin Scorsese signed on to the project Milos Forman had been interested in directing. He dropped out of contention however when he was hired to direct One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. When it came to casting the role of Jerry Langford several big names were considered. These included Johnny Carson, Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin, Sammy Davis Jr., Joey Bishop and Orson Welles. Johnny Carson was the only one to actually be offered the role before Jerry Lewis, but he turned it down. /// Martin Scorsese said later that making this film was an "unsettling" experience, in part because of the embarrassing, bitter material of the script. Scorsese said that he and De Niro may not have worked together again for seven years as a result of how emotionally gruelling it was to make this film. He has also said that he thought De Niro's turn as Rupert Pupkin was De Niro's best performance under his direction. /// The original script for the film was actually written by Paul D. Zimmerman all the way back in the late-1960s. At the time of writing it he had Dick Cavett in mind for the role of the talk show host. /// Before Sandra Bernhard was cast in the role of Masha, the part had been offered to Meryl Streep but she turned it down.
That talk earlier of subverting the image that you're most recognised for leads me nicely onto the other stand-out performance in The King of Comedy, that of Jerry Lewis. Now while I don't believe I have ever actually seen one of his films before, I am well aware of his famous, unique and oft-imitated comic styling; all that childish slapstick and shouts of laaadddyyyy!!! Well there's not a single trace of that persona to be found here in his performance as Jerry Langford. The character seems to be completely worn down and embittered by the level of fame that he has achieved, and I wonder just how close to the truth and to the bone his performance was. The other starring performance is delivered by Sandra Bernhard as Masha, Rupert's fellow Jerry obsessive. In general I can't really stand Bernhard but her screeching, neurotic nature works really well for the character. She is entertaining, downright frightening and aggressively sexual all at the same time. Her attempted seduction of a tied-up Jerry is a spectacularly uncomfortable scene. And it wasn't the only occasion I got that feeling. For me there was a definite Curb Your Enthusiasm vibe to proceeding throughout, with many of the film's laughs being generated out of situations of pure discomfort. The scene in which Rupert and Rita invade Jerry's home under the delusion that Jerry has invited them for the weekend is just brutal to watch. As was the first date that Rupert and Rita went on. Throughout the whole date Rupert is just so spectacularly disingenuous; he is basically just practicing the schtick that he plans to one day use on Jerry's chat show, complete with a rousingly fake showbiz laugh.

I'm not going to claim that I'm now an expert on the works of Martin Scorsese just because of this little marathon of late. Based on what I have seen however I'd say that The King of Comedy is the least obviously Scorsese-ish (Scorsese-ian?) of his films. While thematically you can link the story and its characters to his other films, most notably Taxi Driver, his customary visual flair and creativity are pretty much completely absent. In fact it's so simple and plain-looking that you could argue it more closely resembles a television show than a film. Given Rupert Pupkin's obsession with appearing on TV's Jerry Langford Show I wonder if this was a deliberate move on the part of Scorsese, or perhaps I'm looking too deeply into it and giving Marty too much credit.

Then there's the film's ending which sees Rupert realise the fame he has sought with such demented desire, even if it's fame born out of notoriety more than actual talent. This closing sequence does however present the question of whether it is real or not. Throughout the film we saw Rupert indulging in his delusional fantasies about how great his life was going to turn out when he became famous. It's very easy to imagine this as another of those fantasies, that Rupert is sitting in his cell and this is all in his head. If however it's supposed to be genuine then it's Scorsese's withering attack on the cult of celebrity and what we as a society actually respond to. Or perhaps it's both.

Conclusion - The King of Comedy is a razor-sharp satire and black comedy that sets its sights on celebrity adoration, obsession and mental health. With an excellent script and a terrific performance from Robert De Niro at its core, this is a pretty great flick. If I were just honestly assessing this film on its own merits it may too have gotten a straight
rating. The fact that I didn't take to it quite as much as Hugo however made me feel that I should throw a minus in there just to reflect that.