Movie Forums (http://www.movieforums.com/community/index.php)
-   General Movie Discussion (http://www.movieforums.com/community/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Does anyone have a favorite Western? (http://www.movieforums.com/community/showthread.php?t=28640)

stevo3001 06-07-12 12:40 AM

Originally Posted by Arch Stanton (Post 817684)

As for Clementine... COME ON! It's a great, great movie. I'll grant you Mature wins the "World's Least Convincing Consumptive" award hands-down, but that aside there's some tremendous interplay between him and Fonda - and Fonda himself has rarely been better (and that really is saying something); his startlingly original portrayal of Wyatt Earp is a joy to watch as he effortlessly combines toughness, gentleness and quiet humour. The film itself is also one of John Ford's most thoughtful (and optimistic) explorations of the cost and benefit of establishing civilisation. Finally, it is beautifully framed and photographed. An all-round class act.
I love My Darling Clementine too... in fact it's probably my favourite Western of all, although I'd also consider The Searchers, Man of the West and Heaven's Gate.

TylerDurden99 06-07-12 12:48 AM

Re: Does anyone have a favorite Western?
 
Love the following:

Unforgiven
Dances With Wolves
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
The Assassination Of Jesse James By The Coward Robert Ford
The Searchers

dadgumblah 06-07-12 04:04 AM

Hey Rodent, nice one with WWW. :rotfl:Wow, I went to see that with a friend and his family, not expecting much and getting even less. I can't even watch it for kicks and giggles on television. The tv series, while a bit campy, was loads of fun, and the movie version came in the days of "Let's put Will Smith in everything." I like Will but it was a sad mistake to cast him as Jim West. My friend and his brood loved the film, which is his right as a consumer, but I don't talk about the movie with him because I'd have to bite my tongue to keep from spewing hate about it. Okay, maybe I'm exaggerating a bit, but I put this one right down there with Battlefield Earth.

Ahem, back on topic, my favorite Western is The Outlaw Josey Wales. From its grim start, through its action set-pieces (with bits of humor sprinkled throughout), to its unexpected "community" ending, all with great dialogue, this one played against all my expectations of a Western and soon set the standard for what I look for in a Western.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQt5WPQTwN0

One of my favorite scenes above.

TheMightyCelestial 06-07-12 04:22 AM

My top 5 faves:




value
5. Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969)
The first example of the lightning captured in a bottle that is the Newman & Redford combo. I like Newman's character more though in this movie than in the Sting. We get to see more of him as Butch Cassidy & the relationship with his fellow bank robber, Harry Longabaugh. A really unique western that is both lotsa of fun & tragic at the same time.

4. Magnificent 7 (1960)
Y'know, there may be cowboy movies that are better filmed, with stories that are better written, that capture the western history more accurately, that have an impact that is more poignant or even have characters that are more iconic.
But very few other cowboy flicks (those being a couple of them that were made with a dash of spaghetti sauce on 'em) were more bad-ass than this one.

3. High Noon (1977)
Real time in the Old West.
A simple tale of suspense building tension, as a newly wed marshall must make a decision between a new life by flying the Coop, or staying and standing as a "lone star" until the strike of twelve, in a town that has turned its back against him.

2. Unforgiven (1992)
I guess this film could've also been called The Final Chapter Of The Man With No Name, But Now We've Given Him A Name, Punk.
And yeah, I know, I know ..... it's not fashionable for those who study Western films to like this movie. Luckily, for me, I'm one of those who never studied.

1. The Good, The Bad & The Ugly (1966)
At the outset of the first western movies, the cowboy characters had been categorized between two basic types: Those who wore the white hats, & those who wore the black ones.
As time passed though, the hat colors began to blur between who was bad, who was bad, & then to eventually who was just plain ugly.
Though the final film in the "Man With No Name" trilogy, IMO, the best & most definitive one of the three.
It's almost impossible to think of the genre of the spaghetti western, let alone this particular series & not think of the iconic trio of Clint Eastwood, Lee Van Cleef & Eli Wallach.



dadgumblah 06-07-12 04:32 AM

by flying the Coop
Nice touch there, Celestial. :) Great list, too!

Arch Stanton 06-07-12 05:28 AM

Originally Posted by Miss Vicky (Post 817724)
It isn't a great movie. And the fact that Mature plays a very unconvincing consumptive is the least of my problems with the Holliday character. Doc Holliday was a dentist who died of tuberculosis, not a surgeon who was killed in a gunfight. Of the three films I've seen based on Earp, Holliday and the famous gunfight, IMO Tombstone struck the best balance of entertainment and accuracy. I'd take Russell and Kilmer over Fonda and Mature any day and I typically can't stand Val Kilmer.
Ford clearly has about 0% interest in providing an accurate account of the Earps and the gunfight at the OK Corral. He treats it more as a myth which can be adapted to suit his particular themes and concerns. To say it's a bad film because it's not historically accurate completely misses the point of what Ford was trying to do. It's a film, not a drama-documentary.

gandalf26 06-07-12 06:39 AM

1. Unforgiven

2. Tombstone

3. Open Range

4. Good Bad and the Ugly

Miss Vicky 06-07-12 10:52 AM

Originally Posted by Arch Stanton (Post 817751)
Ford clearly has about 0% interest in providing an accurate account of the Earps and the gunfight at the OK Corral. He treats it more as a myth which can be adapted to suit his particular themes and concerns. To say it's a bad film because it's not historically accurate completely misses the point of what Ford was trying to do. It's a film, not a drama-documentary.

I didn't say that the historical inaccuracy made it a bad film. I said the inaccuracy was my biggest problem with the character of Doc Holliday; so don't jump to conclusions or put words in my mouth.

Though I do love how you criticize the Yuma remake for taking too many liberties with its source material yet completely dismiss - and even defend - the same issue when it comes to Clementine.

I disliked My Darling Clementine because it was slow moving, poorly cast, poorly acted, and - yes - blatantly historically inaccurate. The one thing I require of any movie I watch is the ability for me to emotionally connect with the characters on the screen. Clementine failed at that.

Cream 06-07-12 10:55 AM

Re: Does anyone have a favorite Western?
 
Rio Bravo
http://i777.photobucket.com/albums/y...bum/282429.jpg

rockshox 06-07-12 12:57 PM

Re: Does anyone have a favorite Western?
 
Used to love the bud Spencer and Terrance hill films, trinity is my name etc, funny

Arch Stanton 06-08-12 06:00 AM

Originally Posted by Miss Vicky (Post 817778)
I didn't say that the historical inaccuracy made it a bad film. I said the inaccuracy was my biggest problem with the character of Doc Holliday; so don't jump to conclusions or put words in my mouth.
What words did I put in your mouth? Historical inaccuracy was the only substantive point you'd made until then. Stop being so bad-tempered. :p

However, you've made some more points now, so let's take a look:

Originally Posted by Miss Vicky (Post 817778)
I disliked My Darling Clementine because it was slow moving, poorly cast, poorly acted, and - yes - blatantly historically inaccurate. The one thing I require of any movie I watch is the ability for me to emotionally connect with the characters on the screen. Clementine failed at that.
Slow moving. Well, it certainly isn't an all-action western. Nor is it trying to be. But the story moves forward at a fairly brisk pace and the whole thing is only 97 minutes long, so I wouldn't agree there. On the other hand, any film is slow-moving if you don't like it.

Poorly cast. Both the male leads are deliberately cast against type and I think it words a treat. Mature is the wrong physical type for his role (as I've already said), but he turns in a rather fine performance. Fonda is superb as Earp. The two of them work extremely well together. There's nothing much to object to in the casting of the other roles.

Poorly acted. From my comment above you've probably already guessed that I don't agree. Fonda and Mature are excellent, as is Walter Brennan. Linda Darnell is likeable enough as the tart-with-a-heart. Cathy Downs is a bit forgettable as Clem, but not nearly bad enough to derail the movie. If you're honestly saying the acting in Tombstone is better, then... well, words fail me.

Characters you can relate to. Again, I had absolutely no problem relating to the characters in this film. Fonda, in particular, is immensely likeable. Clearly you don't feel the same, but I can't help thinking that's more a statement about you than the film.

Powderfinger 06-08-12 07:48 AM

Originally Posted by rockshox (Post 817805)
Used to love the bud Spencer and Terrance hill films, trinity is my name etc, funny
Me too :)

Miss Vicky 06-08-12 10:58 AM

Originally Posted by Arch Stanton (Post 817973)
What words did I put in your mouth? Historical inaccuracy was the only substantive point you'd made until then. Stop being so bad-tempered. :p
I already answered this question.

Just because inaccuracy was the only point I'd made when you responded does not mean you can twist it to suit your own needs. But, really, all one has to do to see that historical accuracy is not a high priority for me is to look at my favorite movies list. I can and often do overlook some pretty severe inaccuracies when everything else falls into place. It's only when I'm bored with a movie that such things irritate me.

Slow moving. Well, it certainly isn't an all-action western. Nor is it trying to be. But the story moves forward at a fairly brisk pace and the whole thing is only 97 minutes long, so I wouldn't agree there. On the other hand, any film is slow-moving if you don't like it.
I found it slow paced. I was bored. The length of a film has nothing to do with pacing. I've sat through short movies that felt like they took forever and long movies that felt like only a few minutes.

Poorly cast. Both the male leads are deliberately cast against type and I think it words a treat. Mature is the wrong physical type for his role (as I've already said), but he turns in a rather fine performance. Fonda is superb as Earp. The two of them work extremely well together. There's nothing much to object to in the casting of the other roles.
Mature turns in the same performance he did in pretty much every movie I've seen of his. I love Mature because he was so bad and because he had no delusions about his level - or lack - of talent. The only role I ever found him convincing in was After the Fox, where he played a washed up actor. Not exactly a stretch at that point.

If you're honestly saying the acting in Tombstone is better, then... well, words fail me.
You know, I'm beginning to think you just have a problem with modern Westerns. Are there any modern Westerns you do like? Or are you one of those "classics" snobs?

Characters you can relate to. Again, I had absolutely no problem relating to the characters in this film. Fonda, in particular, is immensely likeable. Clearly you don't feel the same, but I can't help thinking that's more a statement about you than the film.
Yeah, well, you know what they say about opinions. :rolleyes:

cinemaafficionado 06-10-12 01:21 AM

I loved Tombstone. I thought that Val Kilmer was the epitomy of Doc Holiday.

Of course, The Good, The Bad and The Ugly and Once Upon A Time In The West are timeless gems and so is The Wild Bunch.
More current ones that I enjoyed were 3:10 To Yuma, The Missing ( 2003 ) and Seraphim Falls.

Arch Stanton 06-10-12 06:10 AM

Originally Posted by Miss Vicky (Post 817995)
You know, I'm beginning to think you just have a problem with modern Westerns. Are there any modern Westerns you do like? Or are you one of those "classics" snobs?
Now who's making unwarranted assumptions? There have been a number of fine westerns made over the last twenty-odd years: Unforgiven, Lone Star and Open Range to name just three. There have also been plenty of perfectly watchable, entertaining, journeyman westerns, for example: Young Guns, The Quick and the Dead, and (yes) Tombstone.

The reason I weighed in on behalf of classic westerns was that they seemed under-represented by the thread. Up to a point that's natural enough - we're all more interested in films of our own era - but the western is a genre with a rich history and modern examples tend to draw on or reference that history even when (or especially when) they're re-writing the rules. So, for example, you can happily watch The Wild Bunch without much knowledge of earlier westerns, but the film itself assumes you know about them; in particular, it assumes you have a decent knowledge of John Ford westerns which are constantly being referenced (btw, Peckinpah's favourite western was My Darling Clementine - but what did he know about the genre?). Without that knowledge you are missing a whole level of meaning.

And, in any case, some of those old westerns are damn fine films.

Mr. Ken V.B Liar 06-10-12 09:06 AM

http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4147/5...554c5b9e_z.jpg

'A Fistful Of Dollars' & just millimetres behind it 'Once Upon A Time In The West'.

'Tombstone' is also a fine western. True story, biopic or not. Just a great western.

Miss Vicky 06-10-12 03:23 PM

Originally Posted by Arch Stanton (Post 818214)
Now who's making unwarranted assumptions?
I asked a question. You listed a lot of old westerns and, until your most recent post, your only mention of more modern westerns was to point out what you don't like.


The reason I weighed in on behalf of classic westerns was that they seemed under-represented by the thread.
They weren't under-represented. The question the OP presented was in regards to favorite westerns - this is a different concept than what is best or even good - and people responded appropriately. Why should they mention classic westerns if their favorite westerns are more modern?

As for me, there are a few older westerns I enjoy, like Fury at Furnace Creek and The Appaloosa, but I don't enjoy them anywhere near as much as those I've already listed.

Arch Stanton 06-10-12 06:28 PM

Originally Posted by Miss Vicky (Post 818265)
As for me, there are a few older westerns I enjoy, like Fury at Furnace Creek and The Appaloosa, but I don't enjoy them anywhere near as much as those I've already listed.
Fair enough. I very much enjoy all the westerns I listed in my original post.

apophis 06-11-12 01:48 PM

Re: Does anyone have a favorite Western?
 
I don't really care much for westerns. Oddly enough, having said that, I have 3 in my favorite movie list, including my two favorite movies of all time.

Unforgiven
The Outlaw Josey Wales
Open range

Arch Stanton 06-12-12 09:10 AM

Originally Posted by Arch Stanton (Post 818214)
There have been a number of fine westerns made over the last twenty-odd years: Unforgiven, Lone Star and Open Range to name just three.
I can now add the 2010 True Grit to that list. Beautifully shot, and great performances from Bridges and Hailee Steinfeld. I'm fond of the 1969 John Wayne version but the Coens have delivered a much more satisfying, coherent film imo. Excellent.


All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:27 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright, ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Movie Forums